2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 30 | 34 | 28 | 29 | 28 | 29 | 23 | |||||||
Total Students: | 442 | 454 | 504 | 517 | 597 | 484 | 511 | |||||||
Grade 4: | 225 | 50.9% | 218 | 48.0% | 227 | 45.0% | 270 | 52.2% | 119 | 19.9% | 240 | 49.6% | 243 | 47.6% |
Grade 5: | 212 | 48.0% | 225 | 49.6% | 270 | 53.6% | 243 | 47.0% | 247 | 41.4% | 244 | 50.4% | 268 | 52.4% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 225 | 50.9% | 241 | 53.1% | 266 | 52.8% | 276 | 53.4% | 296 | 49.6% | 232 | 47.9% | 259 | 50.7% |
Female: | 217 | 49.1% | 213 | 46.9% | 238 | 47.2% | 241 | 46.6% | 279 | 46.7% | 234 | 48.3% | 222 | 43.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% |
Asian: | 3 | 0.7% | 7 | 1.5% | 9 | 1.8% | 8 | 1.5% | 7 | 1.2% | 6 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.4% |
Hispanic: | 89 | 20.1% | 85 | 18.7% | 92 | 18.3% | 79 | 15.3% | 75 | 12.6% | 54 | 11.2% | 50 | 9.8% |
Black: | 2 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% |
White: | 345 | 78.1% | 357 | 78.6% | 398 | 79.0% | 418 | 80.9% | 499 | 83.6% | 411 | 84.9% | 429 | 84.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 3 | 0.7% | 5 | 1.1% | 2 | 0.4% | 10 | 1.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 189 | 42.8% | 151 | 33.3% | 77 | 15.3% | 138 | 26.7% | 120 | 20.1% | 89 | 18.4% | 75 | 14.7% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 16 | 3.6% | 57 | 12.6% | 112 | 22.2% | 22 | 4.3% | 29 | 4.9% | 26 | 5.4% | 19 | 3.7% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 14.73 | 13.44 | 18.00 | 17.83 | 21.32 | 17.00 | 22.20 |
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
ISAT | ||||||
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 90.1% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 87.8% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 92.3% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.0% | 88.2% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 91.1% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 91.0% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 93.0% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.0% | 63.4% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 79.7% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 75.1% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 80.8% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 79.1% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 77.2% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76.3% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 82.0% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 67.4% | N/A |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 74.9% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.2% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.9% | 80.0% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.8% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.1% | 87.4% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 87.8% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 83.1% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 82.4% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 82.3% | N/A |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 86.1% | N/A |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 88.3% | N/A |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 76.7% | N/A |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 77.0% | N/A |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.1% | N/A |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 84.3% | N/A |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 89.9% | N/A |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | N/A |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.6% | N/A |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 86.8% | N/A |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 88.8% | N/A |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 87.7% | N/A |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 67.3% | N/A |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 67.7% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 66.3% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.0% | 68.7% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 73.6% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.7% | 74.7% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 75.8% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 82.4% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.5% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 82.6% | N/A |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 82.5% | N/A |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 67.2% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Chauncey H Duker School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.