Chapman Intermediate School
6500 Putnam Ford Dr Woodstock GA, 30189, Cherokee County Phone: 770-926-6424 Ranking:  (321 out of 1,747, top 18%)*Type: Regular School Status: Closed Grade: Grade 5 to Grade 6 School District: Cherokee County School District Title I Eligible School: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 50 | 62 | 69 | 72 | 75 | 76 | ||||||
| Total Students: | NA | NA | 921 | 1,125 | 1,218 | 1,205 | 1,158 | 1,200 | ||||||
| Grade 5: | NA | NA | 385 | 41.8% | 558 | 49.6% | 592 | 48.6% | 625 | 51.9% | 572 | 49.4% | 610 | 50.8% |
| Grade 6: | NA | NA | 536 | 58.2% | 567 | 50.4% | 626 | 51.4% | 580 | 48.1% | 586 | 50.6% | 590 | 49.2% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | NA | NA | 467 | 50.7% | 579 | 51.5% | 631 | 51.8% | 644 | 53.4% | 580 | 50.1% | 594 | 49.5% |
| Female: | NA | NA | 454 | 49.3% | 546 | 48.5% | 587 | 48.2% | 561 | 46.6% | 544 | 47.0% | 579 | 48.3% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | NA | NA | 4 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.5% |
| Asian: | NA | NA | 19 | 2.1% | 25 | 2.2% | 23 | 1.9% | 20 | 1.7% | 18 | 1.6% | 16 | 1.3% |
| Hispanic: | NA | NA | 127 | 13.8% | 164 | 14.6% | 161 | 13.2% | 132 | 11.0% | 120 | 10.4% | 117 | 9.8% |
| Black: | NA | NA | 58 | 6.3% | 72 | 6.4% | 80 | 6.6% | 82 | 6.8% | 85 | 7.3% | 85 | 7.1% |
| White: | NA | NA | 680 | 73.8% | 833 | 74.0% | 918 | 75.4% | 925 | 76.8% | 904 | 78.1% | 953 | 79.4% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | NA | NA | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | NA | NA | 32 | 3.5% | 27 | 2.4% | 32 | 2.6% | 39 | 3.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 245 | 26.6% | 303 | 26.9% | 339 | 27.8% | 262 | 21.7% | 204 | 17.6% | 183 | 15.3% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 51 | 5.5% | 64 | 5.7% | 56 | 4.6% | 79 | 6.6% | 68 | 5.9% | 72 | 6.0% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 18.38 | 18.20 | 17.73 | 16.76 | 15.40 | 15.90 | ||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| CRCT | ||||||
| 2006 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 91.6% | 85% |
| 2007 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 93.2% | 87.6% |
| 2008 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 93.1% | 89.9% |
| 2009 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 95.1% | 91.3% |
| 2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.1% | 92% |
| 2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 96.3% | 93% |
| 2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 96.7% | 95% |
| 2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 94.2% |
| 2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 92.6% | 88% |
| 2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93.4% | 88.1% |
| 2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 80.9% | 71.7% |
| 2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 87.5% | 79.2% |
| 2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.7% | 82% |
| 2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 92.4% | 86.6% |
| 2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 87.7% | 84% |
| 2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.0% | 92.9% | 89.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 89.7% | 81% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | 85.5% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 93% | 87.2% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.6% | 87.8% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 96% | 94.6% | 90% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 95.8% | 90.5% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 96.2% | 91% |
| 2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 96.7% | 92.9% |
| 2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.8% | 95.4% | 89% |
| 2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 82.1% | 66.8% |
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 83.7% | 71.3% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 84.9% | 76% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 86.3% | 77% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 86.8% | 76.6% |
| 2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 86.4% | 78% |
| 2013 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 85.4% | 79.6% |
| 2006 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.5% | 91% |
| 2007 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 93.3% | 88.4% |
| 2008 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 90% | 92.5% | 89% |
| 2009 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 82.3% | 71.2% |
| 2010 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 80.1% | 72% |
| 2011 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 83.7% | 71.3% |
| 2012 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 85% | 77% |
| 2013 | Social Studies | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 84.4% | 80.5% |
| 2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 92.2% | 84% |
| 2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.8% | 86.3% |
| 2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 92.3% | 87.4% |
| 2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 94.8% | 90.5% |
| 2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 96.3% | 92% |
| 2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.8% | 96.5% | 91.2% |
| 2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 96.7% | 92% |
| 2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 96.4% | 92.4% |
| 2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 72.3% | 62% |
| 2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 79.3% | 64.5% |
| 2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 82.3% | 69.3% |
| 2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 87.1% | 74.9% |
| 2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 88.2% | 75% |
| 2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 89.3% | 76.5% |
| 2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 88.5% | 80% |
| 2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 91.1% | 82.7% |
| 2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 93.9% | 86% |
| 2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95% | 95.1% | 89.3% |
| 2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 95.6% | 91.4% |
| 2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.1% | 89.9% |
| 2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 96.8% | 91% |
| 2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 99% | 97.9% | 93.9% |
| 2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 98.6% | 96% |
| 2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 99.6% | 98.7% | 96.0% |
| 2006 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 79.8% | 61% |
| 2007 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 78.8% | 59.5% |
| 2008 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 79.7% | 66.1% |
| 2009 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 82.5% | 68.5% |
| 2010 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 85.5% | 70% |
| 2011 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 85% | 70.9% |
| 2012 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 85.1% | 73% |
| 2013 | Science | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 86.3% | 74.0% |
| 2006 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 93% | 93.2% | 85% |
| 2007 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.4% | 83.1% |
| 2010 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78.9% | 64% |
| 2011 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 83.3% | 71.6% |
| 2012 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 84.7% | 73% |
| 2013 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 83.7% | 77.5% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Chapman Intermediate School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.