Cedar Springs Middle School
4873 16 Mile Rd Ne
Cedar Springs MI, 49319, Kent County
Phone: 616-696-9100
Ranking: 
(772 out of 2,213, top 35%)*
(772 out of 2,213, top 35%)*Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 7 to Grade 8
School District: Cedar Springs Public Schools
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 29 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 27 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 507 | 499 | 486 | 462 | 501 | 509 | 525 | |||||||
| Grade 7: | 245 | 48.3% | 241 | 48.3% | 249 | 51.2% | 230 | 49.8% | 236 | 47.1% | 252 | 49.5% | 261 | 49.7% |
| Grade 8: | 251 | 49.5% | 252 | 50.5% | 237 | 48.8% | 232 | 50.2% | 265 | 52.9% | 257 | 50.5% | 264 | 50.3% |
| Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 241 | 47.5% | 250 | 50.1% | 251 | 51.6% | 241 | 52.2% | 242 | 48.3% | 239 | 47.0% | 255 | 48.6% |
| Female: | 266 | 52.5% | 249 | 49.9% | 235 | 48.4% | 221 | 47.8% | 249 | 49.7% | 261 | 51.3% | 266 | 50.7% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 4 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.8% | 7 | 1.5% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 6 | 1.1% |
| Asian: | 2 | 0.4% | 4 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.8% |
| Hispanic: | 17 | 3.4% | 18 | 3.6% | 21 | 4.3% | 16 | 3.5% | 11 | 2.2% | 18 | 3.5% | 15 | 2.9% |
| Black: | 7 | 1.4% | 9 | 1.8% | 8 | 1.6% | 6 | 1.3% | 8 | 1.6% | 11 | 2.2% | 6 | 1.1% |
| White: | 458 | 90.3% | 451 | 90.4% | 440 | 90.5% | 429 | 92.9% | 475 | 94.8% | 474 | 93.1% | 494 | 94.1% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 19 | 3.7% | 14 | 2.8% | 11 | 2.3% | 3 | 0.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 189 | 37.3% | 191 | 38.3% | 194 | 39.9% | 158 | 34.2% | 168 | 33.5% | 144 | 28.3% | 130 | 24.8% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 62 | 12.2% | 61 | 12.2% | 38 | 7.8% | 41 | 8.9% | 51 | 10.2% | 42 | 8.3% | 50 | 9.5% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.41 | 19.80 | 20.40 | 19.53 | 20.02 | 20.40 | 19.60 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| MEAP | ||||||
| 2006 | Listening | 7th Grade | % met std | 55% | 55% | 50% |
| 2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 69.2% | 59.6% |
| 2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 72.8% | 64.3% |
| 2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 81.8% | 72.7% |
| 2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 82.6% |
| 2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 82.2% |
| 2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 84.6% |
| 2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 37.3% | 37.3% | 37.2% |
| 2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 35.1% | 35.1% | 38.4% |
| 2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 75.8% |
| 2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.5% | 79.7% |
| 2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 74.3% | 72.5% |
| 2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 79.6% |
| 2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 88.8% | 82% |
| 2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 83.9% | 79% |
| 2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 64.6% | 64.6% | 59.7% |
| 2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.1% | 66.1% | 62% |
| 2006 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.3% | 74.3% | 66.7% |
| 2007 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 67.1% | 67.1% | 65.4% |
| 2008 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 76.6% |
| 2009 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 77.9% |
| 2011 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 47.8% | 47.8% | 47.8% |
| 2012 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 50.6% | 50.6% | 47.3% |
| 2013 | Writing | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 61.9% | 51.7% |
| 2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 70.5% | 63.2% |
| 2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 75.5% | 68.1% |
| 2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 81.2% | 71.6% |
| 2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 74.5% |
| 2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.6% | 71.6% | 70.3% |
| 2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 78% |
| 2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 20.9% | 20.9% | 29.4% |
| 2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 23.8% | 23.8% | 32.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.7% | 72.9% |
| 2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 75.6% |
| 2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 82.3% | 77.1% |
| 2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 78% | 75.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 83.4% |
| 2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 81.9% |
| 2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 69.8% | 60.5% |
| 2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 69.3% | 65.7% |
| 2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 76.8% |
| 2007 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 87.9% | 74.9% |
| 2008 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 91.2% | 79.2% |
| 2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 76.3% |
| 2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.5% | 83.5% | 75.9% |
| 2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 78.1% |
| 2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 19.1% | 19.1% | 16.5% |
| 2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 16.7% | 16.7% | 15.9% |
| 2006 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.7% | 64.7% |
| 2007 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.8% | 66.8% |
| 2008 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 70.4% | 69.8% |
| 2009 | Writing | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 77.8% | 74.2% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Cedar Springs Middle School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.