USA.com / Alabama / Enterprise, Ozark Area / Public Schools / Carver Magnet School For Math Sci And Technology
Carver Magnet School For Math Sci And Technology
1001 Webb Rd
Dothan AL, 36303, Houston County
Phone: 334-794-1440
Ranking: 
(13 out of 1,064, top 1%)*
(13 out of 1,064, top 1%)*Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 6 to Grade 8
School District: Dothan City School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 24 | 28 | 27 | 25 | 24 | 30 | 31 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 565 | 572 | 488 | 431 | 453 | 571 | 617 | |||||||
| Grade 6: | 173 | 30.6% | 227 | 39.7% | 197 | 40.4% | 126 | 29.2% | 163 | 36.0% | 196 | 34.3% | 194 | 31.4% |
| Grade 7: | 211 | 37.3% | 202 | 35.3% | 140 | 28.7% | 157 | 36.4% | 154 | 34.0% | 188 | 32.9% | 230 | 37.3% |
| Grade 8: | 181 | 32.0% | 143 | 25.0% | 151 | 30.9% | 148 | 34.3% | 136 | 30.0% | 187 | 32.7% | 193 | 31.3% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 270 | 47.8% | 272 | 47.6% | 245 | 50.2% | 209 | 48.5% | 209 | 46.1% | 249 | 43.6% | 289 | 46.8% |
| Female: | 295 | 52.2% | 300 | 52.4% | 243 | 49.8% | 222 | 51.5% | 236 | 52.1% | 314 | 55.0% | 324 | 52.5% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Asian: | 20 | 3.5% | 15 | 2.6% | 15 | 3.1% | 10 | 2.3% | 13 | 2.9% | 11 | 1.9% | 11 | 1.8% |
| Hispanic: | 20 | 3.5% | 21 | 3.7% | 16 | 3.3% | 9 | 2.1% | 6 | 1.3% | 9 | 1.6% | 9 | 1.5% |
| Black: | 187 | 33.1% | 200 | 35.0% | 152 | 31.1% | 131 | 30.4% | 123 | 27.2% | 147 | 25.7% | 159 | 25.8% |
| White: | 334 | 59.1% | 332 | 58.0% | 303 | 62.1% | 279 | 64.7% | 308 | 68.0% | 404 | 70.8% | 438 | 71.0% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 2 | 0.4% | 2 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 150 | 26.5% | 190 | 33.2% | 144 | 29.5% | 93 | 21.6% | 80 | 17.7% | 103 | 18.0% | 112 | 18.2% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 47 | 8.3% | 53 | 9.3% | 41 | 8.4% | 28 | 6.5% | 33 | 7.3% | 44 | 7.7% | 43 | 7.0% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 23.54 | 20.25 | 17.91 | 17.07 | 18.88 | 19.00 | 19.90 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| ADAW | ||||||
| 2005 | Grammar and Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.2% | 40.4% | 41% |
| 2006 | Grammar and Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 45.7% | 45.4% |
| 2008 | Grammar and Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.59% | 58.12% | 46.94% |
| 2009 | Grammar and Usage | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.33% | 60.46% | 56.16% |
| 2005 | Holistic Composition | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.7% | 63.5% | 63% |
| 2006 | Holistic Composition | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 66.6% | 60% |
| 2008 | Holistic Composition | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.43% | 72.69% | 65.27% |
| 2009 | Holistic Composition | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.06% | 73.45% | 65.55% |
| 2005 | Sentence Formation | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 41.4% | 48.9% |
| 2006 | Sentence Formation | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 52.5% | 55.1% |
| 2008 | Sentence Formation | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.73% | 61.61% | 56.69% |
| 2009 | Sentence Formation | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.07% | 68.79% | 62.72% |
| 2005 | Writing Mechanics | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 53.2% | 48.9% |
| 2006 | Writing Mechanics | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 55% | 51.2% |
| 2008 | Writing Mechanics | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.77% | 71.17% | 58.32% |
| 2009 | Writing Mechanics | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.12% | 72.22% | 60.06% |
| ARMT | ||||||
| 2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 61.4% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 70.2% | 74.7% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.63% | 69.47% | 73.46% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 92.43% | 67.83% | 71.9% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 89.12% | 71.01% | 74.92% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.38% | 75.37% | 76.94% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 74.24% | 77.64% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.41% | 80.55% | 77.16% |
| 2005 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98% | 79.1% | 81.6% |
| 2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 81.5% | 83% |
| 2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.76% | 86.63% | 84.87% |
| 2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.38% | 83.81% | 86.61% |
| 2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 99.48% | 86.83% | 86.2% |
| 2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.76% | 85.53% | 86.13% |
| 2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.47% | 88.19% |
| 2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 98.96% | 92.59% | 88.35% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 45.6% | 56.9% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 56.3% | 59.1% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.57% | 52.45% | 59.82% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 55.02% | 61.26% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 78.16% | 62.19% | 65.79% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 72.37% | 68.76% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 98.65% | 78.11% | 70.36% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % met std | 98.5% | 79.26% | 72.5% |
| 2005 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 72.5% | 75.1% |
| 2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.2% | 74.3% | 74.3% |
| 2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.67% | 77.37% | 77% |
| 2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 99.49% | 79.27% | 79.13% |
| 2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 98.85% | 82.09% | 81.28% |
| 2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 99.3% | 85.35% | 83.02% |
| 2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 99.32% | 87.08% | 84.9% |
| 2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 89.14% | 86.25% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 51.1% | 63% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 69.2% | 67.6% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 86.34% | 59.34% | 66.3% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.79% | 67.72% | 68.13% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.28% | 76.49% | 73.77% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.72% | 84.66% | 78.62% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.97% | 85.98% | 77.01% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 83.58% | 78.62% |
| 2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.1% | 65.1% | 69.5% |
| 2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 72.9% | 71.7% |
| 2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 72.48% | 71.94% |
| 2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 99.46% | 77.17% | 73.87% |
| 2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 97.34% | 76.72% | 74.89% |
| 2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.21% | 75.43% | 73.51% |
| 2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 98.65% | 80.37% | 76.95% |
| 2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 100% | 79% | 79.33% |
| ASA | ||||||
| 2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.95% | 57.4% | 60.51% |
| 2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.51% | 67.59% | 70.34% |
| 2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 97.82% | 62.81% | 68.79% |
| 2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.87% | 59.17% | 68.5% |
| 2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 68.37% | 75.67% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Carver Magnet School For Math Sci And Technology was rated 5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.