Bowsher High School
2200 Arlington Ave
Toledo OH, 43614, Lucas County
Phone: 419-671-2000
Ranking: (603 out of 821, bottom 27%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Toledo City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 73 | 66 | 78 | 84 | 87 | 82 | 87 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,186 | 1,204 | 1,322 | 1,441 | 1,297 | 1,371 | 1,348 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 392 | 33.1% | 378 | 31.4% | 351 | 26.6% | 466 | 32.3% | 425 | 32.8% | 464 | 33.8% | 429 | 31.8% |
Grade 10: | 271 | 22.8% | 257 | 21.3% | 349 | 26.4% | 328 | 22.8% | 302 | 23.3% | 328 | 23.9% | 346 | 25.7% |
Grade 11: | 256 | 21.6% | 255 | 21.2% | 305 | 23.1% | 323 | 22.4% | 288 | 22.2% | 314 | 22.9% | 272 | 20.2% |
Grade 12: | 267 | 22.5% | 314 | 26.1% | 317 | 24.0% | 324 | 22.5% | 282 | 21.7% | 265 | 19.3% | 301 | 22.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 628 | 53.0% | 620 | 51.5% | 681 | 51.5% | 718 | 49.8% | 630 | 48.6% | 665 | 48.5% | 656 | 48.7% |
Female: | 558 | 47.0% | 584 | 48.5% | 641 | 48.5% | 723 | 50.2% | 626 | 48.3% | 670 | 48.9% | 663 | 49.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.4% | 7 | 0.6% | 11 | 0.8% | 7 | 0.5% | 10 | 0.8% | 11 | 0.8% | 16 | 1.2% |
Hispanic: | 89 | 7.5% | 95 | 7.9% | 96 | 7.3% | 96 | 6.7% | 76 | 5.9% | 87 | 6.3% | 86 | 6.4% |
Black: | 473 | 39.9% | 465 | 38.6% | 534 | 40.4% | 606 | 42.1% | 458 | 35.3% | 483 | 35.2% | 415 | 30.8% |
White: | 543 | 45.8% | 577 | 47.9% | 631 | 47.7% | 682 | 47.3% | 718 | 55.4% | 762 | 55.6% | 805 | 59.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 76 | 6.4% | 60 | 5.0% | 49 | 3.7% | 49 | 3.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 608 | 51.3% | 603 | 50.1% | 677 | 51.2% | NA | NA | 370 | 28.5% | 384 | 28.0% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 56 | 4.7% | 48 | 4.0% | 58 | 4.4% | NA | NA | 42 | 3.2% | 44 | 3.2% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.25 | 18.24 | 16.95 | 17.15 | 14.91 | 16.70 | 15.50 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 48.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 70.3% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 63.4% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.8% | 64.9% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.7% | 64% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.5% | 69.7% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.6% | 70.8% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.9% | 69.9% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 69.6% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.9% | 69.7% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.6% | 63.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 90.6% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 80.4% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 78.6% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 76.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 77.9% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 72.2% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 78.7% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 73.7% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.0% | 79.0% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 52.9% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.1% | 50.3% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 54.2% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 55.6% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 60.6% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 59.7% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 63.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 60.8% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 61.0% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 67.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 64.6% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 63.7% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 66.9% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 72.3% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 71.4% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 67.3% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.3% | 66.1% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 64.7% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 82.7% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 79.1% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 85.2% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 81.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 88.7% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 79.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 84.7% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 81.6% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 76.9% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 80.8% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 79.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 81.3% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 83.5% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 82.3% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 80.1% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 82.2% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 88.3% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 88.7% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 87.5% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 88.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.2% | 87.6% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 85.1% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.0% | 89.6% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 70.9% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 69.8% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 71.5% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 76.2% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.6% | 75.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 73.9% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 76.4% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 80.5% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.1% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 81.5% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 84% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 82.4% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 77.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 83.0% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 89.2% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 90.5% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 88.6% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 90.5% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 90.5% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 88.1% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 90.1% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Bowsher High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.