Bedford High School
481 Northfield Rd
Bedford OH, 44146, Cuyahoga County
Phone: 440-786-3522
Ranking: (673 out of 821, bottom 18%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Bedford City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 67 | 67 | 68 | 72 | 76 | 89 | 90 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,115 | 1,177 | 1,151 | 1,214 | 1,252 | 1,319 | 1,370 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 281 | 25.2% | 332 | 28.2% | 280 | 24.3% | 337 | 27.8% | 350 | 28.0% | 374 | 28.4% | 387 | 28.2% |
Grade 10: | 306 | 27.4% | 281 | 23.9% | 303 | 26.3% | 302 | 24.9% | 299 | 23.9% | 318 | 24.1% | 337 | 24.6% |
Grade 11: | 243 | 21.8% | 278 | 23.6% | 282 | 24.5% | 276 | 22.7% | 301 | 24.0% | 302 | 22.9% | 335 | 24.5% |
Grade 12: | 285 | 25.6% | 286 | 24.3% | 286 | 24.8% | 299 | 24.6% | 302 | 24.1% | 324 | 24.6% | 311 | 22.7% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 550 | 49.3% | 575 | 48.9% | 578 | 50.2% | 610 | 50.2% | 615 | 49.1% | 655 | 49.7% | 652 | 47.6% |
Female: | 565 | 50.7% | 602 | 51.1% | 573 | 49.8% | 604 | 49.8% | 560 | 44.7% | 594 | 45.0% | 649 | 47.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.5% | 3 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 3 | 0.2% | 5 | 0.4% |
Hispanic: | 17 | 1.5% | 16 | 1.4% | 15 | 1.3% | 13 | 1.1% | 14 | 1.1% | 17 | 1.3% | 19 | 1.4% |
Black: | 919 | 82.4% | 964 | 81.9% | 947 | 82.3% | 984 | 81.1% | 995 | 79.5% | 1,038 | 78.7% | 1,050 | 76.6% |
White: | 126 | 11.3% | 146 | 12.4% | 135 | 11.7% | 157 | 12.9% | 171 | 13.7% | 198 | 15.0% | 230 | 16.8% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 46 | 4.1% | 44 | 3.7% | 47 | 4.1% | 56 | 4.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 549 | 49.2% | 568 | 48.3% | 541 | 47.0% | 539 | 44.4% | 541 | 43.2% | 478 | 36.2% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 108 | 9.7% | 115 | 9.8% | 125 | 10.9% | 116 | 9.6% | 124 | 9.9% | 126 | 9.6% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.55 | 17.47 | 17.00 | 16.86 | 16.47 | 14.80 | 15.20 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 50.5% | 50.5% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.5% | 64.5% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.3% | 66.3% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 60.8% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 61.6% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 61.9% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.1% | 69.1% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.4% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.3% | 76.1% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.4% | 80.4% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 69.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 91.7% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.5% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 78.4% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.8% | 79.8% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 74.6% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.1% | 80.1% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 80.4% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 86.2% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 52.5% | 52.5% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 54% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 51.7% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.1% | 60.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.4% | 53.4% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.1% | 54.1% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.2% | 53.2% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.5% | 59.6% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 66.5% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 72.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 72.3% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 60.6% | 60.6% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.5% | 67.5% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.6% | 71.6% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 72.4% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 66.5% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 74.7% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.1% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 83.9% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86% | 85.8% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.9% | 79.9% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 80.3% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 89.2% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 85.0% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 82.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 77.5% | 77.5% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 78.2% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 80.2% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 86.8% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.1% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.5% | 92.5% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.7% | 70.7% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 70.6% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.8% | 73.8% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 74.9% | 74.9% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 69.5% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 79.2% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 80.1% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.3% | 80.3% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.9% | 79.9% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 83.4% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 80.9% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 82.9% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 85.3% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 90.3% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.4% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Bedford High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.