USA.com / Texas / Dallas County / Hutchins, TX / 75141 / Public Schools / A Maceo Smith New Technology High School
A Maceo Smith New Technology High School
3030 Stag Rd Dallas TX, 75241, Dallas County Phone: 214-932-7600 Ranking: ![]() Type: Regular Other School Status: Currently Operational Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 11 School District: Dallas Independent School District Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA Magnet: NA Charter: NA Shared-Time School: NA |
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 28 | 22 | NA | NA | 66 | 70 | 72 | 76 | ||||||
Total Students: | 351 | 262 | NA | NA | 816 | 879 | 952 | 1,089 | ||||||
Grade 9: | 132 | 37.6% | 145 | 55.3% | NA | NA | 195 | 23.9% | 276 | 31.4% | 332 | 34.9% | 405 | 37.2% |
Grade 10: | 119 | 33.9% | 117 | 44.7% | NA | NA | 231 | 28.3% | 232 | 26.4% | 246 | 25.8% | 255 | 23.4% |
Grade 11: | 100 | 28.5% | NA | NA | NA | NA | 185 | 22.7% | 188 | 21.4% | 188 | 19.7% | 219 | 20.1% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 181 | 51.6% | 140 | 53.4% | NA | NA | 411 | 50.4% | 433 | 49.3% | 470 | 49.4% | 535 | 49.1% |
Female: | 170 | 48.4% | 122 | 46.6% | NA | NA | 405 | 49.6% | 438 | 49.8% | 474 | 49.8% | 550 | 50.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.6% | 4 | 1.5% | NA | NA | 7 | 0.9% | 2 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 2 | 0.6% | 3 | 1.1% | NA | NA | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
Hispanic: | 225 | 64.1% | 161 | 61.5% | NA | NA | 196 | 24.0% | 183 | 20.8% | 163 | 17.1% | 171 | 15.7% |
Black: | 103 | 29.3% | 76 | 29.0% | NA | NA | 602 | 73.8% | 682 | 77.6% | 773 | 81.2% | 906 | 83.2% |
White: | 13 | 3.7% | 15 | 5.7% | NA | NA | 9 | 1.1% | 12 | 1.4% | 13 | 1.4% | 11 | 1.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.8% | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 5 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.4% | NA | NA | 1 | 0.1% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 276 | 78.6% | 180 | 68.7% | NA | NA | 685 | 83.9% | 683 | 77.7% | 726 | 76.3% | 844 | 77.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 20 | 5.7% | 33 | 12.6% | NA | NA | 18 | 2.2% | 34 | 3.9% | 46 | 4.8% | 66 | 6.1% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.54 | 11.91 | NA | NA | 12.32 | 12.49 | 13.20 | 14.30 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
STAAR EOC | ||||||
2012 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 88% | 75% | 83% |
2013 | Algebra I | End of course | % met std | 87% | 68% | 78% |
2013 | Algebra II | End of course | % met std | 100% | 96% | 97% |
2012 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 99% | 83% | 87% |
2013 | Biology | End of course | % met std | 99% | 81% | 85% |
2013 | Chemistry | End of course | % met std | 96% | 80% | 84% |
2012 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 84% | 56% | 68% |
2013 | English I Reading | End of course | % met std | 89% | 54% | 65% |
2012 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 67% | 43% | 55% |
2013 | English I Writing | End of course | % met std | 76% | 37% | 48% |
2013 | English II Reading | End of course | % met std | 89% | 72% | 78% |
2013 | English II Writing | End of course | % met std | 67% | 43% | 52% |
2012 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 95% | 95% | 98% |
2013 | Geometry | End of course | % met std | 91% | 80% | 86% |
2012 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 95% | 76% | 81% |
2013 | World Geography | End of course | % met std | 99% | 70% | 75% |
2013 | World History | End of course | % met std | 94% | 65% | 70% |
TAKS | ||||||
2004 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 33% | 49% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 27% | 45% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 33% | 49% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 51% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 24% | 51% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 32% | 56% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 44% | 68% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 10th Grade | % met std | 39% | 64% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 56% | 69% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 60% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 76% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 77% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 80% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 83% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 87% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 43% | 49% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 25% | 38% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 20% | 42% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 28% | 42% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 32% | 50% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 26% | 52% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 38% | 65% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 45% | 66% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79% | 83% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 78% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 78% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 81% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 72% | 86% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 88% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 92% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83% | 92% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 75% | 78% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 69% | 72% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 71% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 53% | 72% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 66% | 74% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 64% | 77% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 74% | 86% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 11th Grade | % met std | 71% | 87% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 70% | 84% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 79% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88% | 85% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 86% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 81% | 90% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 91% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 84% | 92% | N/A |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73% | 77% | N/A |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 75% | 75% | N/A |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 69% | 68% | N/A |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 49% | 68% | N/A |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73% | 75% | N/A |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60% | 82% | N/A |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85% | 88% | N/A |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 73% | 88% | N/A |
2004 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 98% | 96% | N/A |
2005 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 93% | N/A |
2006 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 93% | N/A |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93% | N/A |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94% | 95% | N/A |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 97% | N/A |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 98% | N/A |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95% | 98% | N/A |
2004 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 30% | 42% | N/A |
2005 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 16% | 35% | N/A |
2006 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 23% | 37% | N/A |
2007 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 18% | 41% | N/A |
2008 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 22% | 45% | N/A |
2009 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 29% | 56% | N/A |
2010 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 43% | 60% | N/A |
2011 | Mathematics | 9th Grade | % met std | 44% | 60% | N/A |
2004 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 72% | 72% | N/A |
2005 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 64% | 67% | N/A |
2006 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 75% | 77% | N/A |
2007 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 71% | 75% | N/A |
2008 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 67% | 76% | N/A |
2009 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 72% | 83% | N/A |
2010 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 85% | 87% | N/A |
2011 | Reading | 9th Grade | % met std | 78% | 83% | N/A |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
Teacher's Experience and Compensation
2007 | |
Teachers with Bachelor Degree: | 59.2% |
Teachers with Master or PhD Degree: | 35.2% |
Mean Number of Years of Teaching: | 12.0 years |
Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | 40.8% |
Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | 59.2% |
Mean Base Salary: | $50,949.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 5 Years of Experience of Less: | $43,431.0 |
Mean Base Salary of Teachers with 6 Years of Experience or More: | $56,140.0 |
* A Maceo Smith New Technology High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.