Onalaska School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Onalaska School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,663, see rank, 100% | 2,635,602 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 7,267, 94.83%, see rank | 87.01% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 4,725, 61.66%, see rank | 58.88% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 2,542, 33.17%, see rank | 28.13% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 396, 5.17%, see rank | 12.99% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 169, 2.21%, see rank | 1.55% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 82, 1.07%, see rank | 1.14% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 33, 0.43%, see rank | 0.58% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 7.02% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 112, 1.46%, see rank | 2.67% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Onalaska School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,522, see rank, 100% | 2,624,358 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 7,253, 96.42%, see rank | 86.87% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 4,773, 63.45%, see rank | 59.12% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 2,480, 32.97%, see rank | 27.75% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 269, 3.58%, see rank | 13.13% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 86, 1.14%, see rank | 2.41% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 64, 0.85%, see rank | 1.30% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 20, 0.27%, see rank | 0.36% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 42, 0.56%, see rank | 7.36% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 57, 0.76%, see rank | 1.69% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Onalaska School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,426, see rank, 100% | 2,620,401 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 7,137, 96.11%, see rank | 87.25% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 4,669, 62.87%, see rank | 59.85% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 2,468, 33.23%, see rank | 27.40% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 289, 3.89%, see rank | 12.75% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 52, 0.70%, see rank | 1.66% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 132, 1.78%, see rank | 1.18% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 64, 0.86%, see rank | 0.59% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 6.66% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 41, 0.55%, see rank | 2.64% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Onalaska School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,367, see rank, 100% | 2,593,073 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 7,021, 95.30%, see rank | 87.72% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 4,725, 64.14%, see rank | 60.96% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 2,296, 31.17%, see rank | 26.76% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 346, 4.70%, see rank | 12.28% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 124, 1.68%, see rank | 1.82% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 69, 0.94%, see rank | 1.12% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 70, 0.95%, see rank | 0.78% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 47, 0.64%, see rank | 6.25% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 36, 0.49%, see rank | 2.30% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Onalaska School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,329, see rank, 100% | 2,549,915 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,882, 93.90%, see rank | 88.10% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 4,886, 66.67%, see rank | 61.54% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,996, 27.23%, see rank | 26.56% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 447, 6.10%, see rank | 11.90% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 112, 1.53%, see rank | 1.85% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 160, 2.18%, see rank | 1.04% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 71, 0.97%, see rank | 0.88% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 58, 0.79%, see rank | 6.01% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 46, 0.63%, see rank | 2.11% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
