Bristol No. 1 School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Bristol No. 1 School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,895, see rank, 100% | 2,635,602 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,860, 98.15%, see rank | 87.01% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,543, 81.42%, see rank | 58.88% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 317, 16.73%, see rank | 28.13% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 35, 1.85%, see rank | 12.99% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.55% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 16, 0.84%, see rank | 1.14% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.58% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 19, 1.00%, see rank | 7.02% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.67% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Bristol No. 1 School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 2,016, see rank, 100% | 2,624,358 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,871, 92.81%, see rank | 86.87% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,569, 77.83%, see rank | 59.12% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 302, 14.98%, see rank | 27.75% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 145, 7.19%, see rank | 13.13% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 25, 1.24%, see rank | 2.41% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 48, 2.38%, see rank | 1.30% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 9, 0.45%, see rank | 0.36% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 38, 1.88%, see rank | 7.36% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 25, 1.24%, see rank | 1.69% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Bristol No. 1 School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,715, see rank, 100% | 2,620,401 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,696, 98.89%, see rank | 87.25% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,460, 85.13%, see rank | 59.85% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 236, 13.76%, see rank | 27.40% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 19, 1.11%, see rank | 12.75% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.66% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 19, 1.11%, see rank | 1.18% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.59% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 6.66% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.64% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Bristol No. 1 School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,780, see rank, 100% | 2,593,073 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,663, 93.43%, see rank | 87.72% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,340, 75.28%, see rank | 60.96% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 323, 18.15%, see rank | 26.76% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 117, 6.57%, see rank | 12.28% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 35, 1.97%, see rank | 1.82% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.12% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.78% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 6.25% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 82, 4.61%, see rank | 2.30% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Bristol No. 1 School District | Wisconsin | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,986, see rank, 100% | 2,549,915 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,758, 88.52%, see rank | 88.10% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,387, 69.84%, see rank | 61.54% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 371, 18.68%, see rank | 26.56% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 228, 11.48%, see rank | 11.90% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 102, 5.14%, see rank | 1.85% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.04% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.88% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 6.01% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 126, 6.34%, see rank | 2.11% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
