Tukwila School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Tukwila School District | Washington | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,367, see rank, 100% | 2,921,364 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,960, 94.48%, see rank | 90.55% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 2,489, 33.79%, see rank | 56.77% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 4,471, 60.69%, see rank | 33.78% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 407, 5.52%, see rank | 9.45% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 112, 1.52%, see rank | 1.80% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 41, 0.56%, see rank | 1.09% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 118, 1.60%, see rank | 0.74% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 76, 1.03%, see rank | 3.19% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 60, 0.81%, see rank | 2.59% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Tukwila School District | Washington | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,353, see rank, 100% | 2,885,677 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,817, 92.71%, see rank | 90.80% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 2,740, 37.26%, see rank | 58.01% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 4,077, 55.45%, see rank | 32.79% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 536, 7.29%, see rank | 9.20% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 316, 4.30%, see rank | 2.50% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 69, 0.94%, see rank | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 30, 0.41%, see rank | 0.43% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 20, 0.27%, see rank | 3.12% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.05% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 101, 1.37%, see rank | 1.68% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Tukwila School District | Washington | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,448, see rank, 100% | 2,884,186 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,957, 93.41%, see rank | 90.84% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 2,521, 33.85%, see rank | 57.95% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 4,436, 59.56%, see rank | 32.89% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 491, 6.59%, see rank | 9.16% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 233, 3.13%, see rank | 1.89% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 16, 0.21%, see rank | 1.26% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 89, 1.19%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 32, 0.43%, see rank | 3.05% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 121, 1.62%, see rank | 2.29% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Tukwila School District | Washington | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 7,309, see rank, 100% | 2,829,352 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,787, 92.86%, see rank | 91.09% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 2,722, 37.24%, see rank | 59.00% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 4,065, 55.62%, see rank | 32.09% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 522, 7.14%, see rank | 8.91% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 277, 3.79%, see rank | 1.85% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 25, 0.34%, see rank | 1.28% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 104, 1.42%, see rank | 0.71% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.93% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 116, 1.59%, see rank | 2.12% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Tukwila School District | Washington | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,978, see rank, 100% | 2,745,170 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,253, 89.61%, see rank | 91.52% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 2,603, 37.30%, see rank | 59.80% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,650, 52.31%, see rank | 31.72% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 725, 10.39%, see rank | 8.48% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 284, 4.07%, see rank | 1.86% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 38, 0.54%, see rank | 1.14% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 251, 3.60%, see rank | 0.76% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.72% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 152, 2.18%, see rank | 1.98% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
