Pittsburg School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Pittsburg School District | New Hampshire | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,758, see rank, 100% | 617,286 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 452, 25.71%, see rank | 84.17% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 361, 20.53%, see rank | 59.80% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 91, 5.18%, see rank | 24.37% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 1,306, 74.29%, see rank | 15.83% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 18, 1.02%, see rank | 1.29% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 11, 0.63%, see rank | 0.87% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 15, 0.85%, see rank | 0.60% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,220, 69.40%, see rank | 10.52% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 42, 2.39%, see rank | 2.55% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Pittsburg School District | New Hampshire | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,748, see rank, 100% | 614,754 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 414, 23.68%, see rank | 84.42% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 349, 19.97%, see rank | 59.91% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 65, 3.72%, see rank | 24.51% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 1,334, 76.32%, see rank | 15.58% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 23, 1.32%, see rank | 2.16% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 16, 0.92%, see rank | 1.22% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 4, 0.23%, see rank | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,276, 73.00%, see rank | 10.40% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.00% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 15, 0.86%, see rank | 1.44% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Pittsburg School District | New Hampshire | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,603, see rank, 100% | 613,995 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 498, 31.07%, see rank | 84.18% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 428, 26.70%, see rank | 60.59% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 70, 4.37%, see rank | 23.59% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 1,105, 68.93%, see rank | 15.82% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 24, 1.50%, see rank | 1.41% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 10, 0.62%, see rank | 1.00% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.60% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,044, 65.13%, see rank | 10.45% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 27, 1.68%, see rank | 2.36% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Pittsburg School District | New Hampshire | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,473, see rank, 100% | 607,758 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 465, 31.57%, see rank | 84.54% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 419, 28.45%, see rank | 61.41% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 46, 3.12%, see rank | 23.13% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 1,008, 68.43%, see rank | 15.46% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 10, 0.68%, see rank | 1.39% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 12, 0.81%, see rank | 1.14% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.64% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 960, 65.17%, see rank | 10.16% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 26, 1.77%, see rank | 2.12% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Pittsburg School District | New Hampshire | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,338, see rank, 100% | 592,898 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 398, 29.75%, see rank | 84.70% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 358, 26.76%, see rank | 61.84% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 40, 2.99%, see rank | 22.86% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 940, 70.25%, see rank | 15.30% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 12, 0.90%, see rank | 1.45% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.09% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 899, 67.19%, see rank | 10.11% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 29, 2.17%, see rank | 1.99% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
