Sikeston School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Sikeston School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 9,287, see rank, 100% | 2,723,417 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,402, 90.47%, see rank | 86.70% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,084, 54.74%, see rank | 58.91% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,318, 35.73%, see rank | 27.79% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 885, 9.53%, see rank | 13.30% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 220, 2.37%, see rank | 2.21% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 254, 2.74%, see rank | 1.40% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 61, 0.66%, see rank | 3.29% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 350, 3.77%, see rank | 5.57% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Sikeston School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 9,234, see rank, 100% | 2,712,729 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,511, 92.17%, see rank | 87.57% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,236, 56.70%, see rank | 60.22% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,275, 35.47%, see rank | 27.35% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 723, 7.83%, see rank | 12.43% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 221, 2.39%, see rank | 3.43% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 146, 1.58%, see rank | 1.63% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 48, 0.52%, see rank | 0.57% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 37, 0.40%, see rank | 2.96% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 271, 2.93%, see rank | 3.83% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Sikeston School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 9,181, see rank, 100% | 2,710,506 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,374, 91.21%, see rank | 87.00% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,088, 55.42%, see rank | 60.00% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,286, 35.79%, see rank | 27.00% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 807, 8.79%, see rank | 13.00% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 291, 3.17%, see rank | 2.33% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 121, 1.32%, see rank | 1.54% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 62, 0.68%, see rank | 3.11% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 333, 3.63%, see rank | 5.20% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Sikeston School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 9,314, see rank, 100% | 2,687,610 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,562, 91.93%, see rank | 87.44% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,333, 57.26%, see rank | 61.21% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,229, 34.67%, see rank | 26.23% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 752, 8.07%, see rank | 12.56% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 302, 3.24%, see rank | 2.36% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 41, 0.44%, see rank | 1.57% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 9, 0.10%, see rank | 0.83% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 84, 0.90%, see rank | 2.91% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 316, 3.39%, see rank | 4.88% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Sikeston School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 9,843, see rank, 100% | 2,648,248 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,973, 91.16%, see rank | 87.69% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,706, 57.97%, see rank | 61.66% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 3,267, 33.19%, see rank | 26.02% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 870, 8.84%, see rank | 12.31% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 382, 3.88%, see rank | 2.44% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 73, 0.74%, see rank | 1.55% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 10, 0.10%, see rank | 0.86% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 52, 0.53%, see rank | 2.74% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 353, 3.59%, see rank | 4.70% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
