King City R-I School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | King City R-I School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 944, see rank, 100% | 2,723,417 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 773, 81.89%, see rank | 86.70% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 583, 61.76%, see rank | 58.91% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 190, 20.13%, see rank | 27.79% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 171, 18.11%, see rank | 13.30% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 19, 2.01%, see rank | 2.21% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 9, 0.95%, see rank | 1.40% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 2, 0.21%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 3.29% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 141, 14.94%, see rank | 5.57% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | King City R-I School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 878, see rank, 100% | 2,712,729 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 755, 85.99%, see rank | 87.57% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 557, 63.44%, see rank | 60.22% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 198, 22.55%, see rank | 27.35% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 123, 14.01%, see rank | 12.43% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 16, 1.82%, see rank | 3.43% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 4, 0.46%, see rank | 1.63% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 17, 1.94%, see rank | 0.57% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 16, 1.82%, see rank | 2.96% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 70, 7.97%, see rank | 3.83% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | King City R-I School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 882, see rank, 100% | 2,710,506 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 761, 86.28%, see rank | 87.00% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 569, 64.51%, see rank | 60.00% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 192, 21.77%, see rank | 27.00% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 121, 13.72%, see rank | 13.00% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 18, 2.04%, see rank | 2.33% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 9, 1.02%, see rank | 1.54% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 2, 0.23%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 3.11% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 92, 10.43%, see rank | 5.20% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | King City R-I School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 884, see rank, 100% | 2,687,610 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 746, 84.39%, see rank | 87.44% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 572, 64.71%, see rank | 61.21% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 174, 19.68%, see rank | 26.23% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 138, 15.61%, see rank | 12.56% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 8, 0.90%, see rank | 2.36% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 24, 2.71%, see rank | 1.57% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 14, 1.58%, see rank | 0.83% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.91% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 92, 10.41%, see rank | 4.88% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | King City R-I School District | Missouri | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 856, see rank, 100% | 2,648,248 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 736, 85.98%, see rank | 87.69% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 544, 63.55%, see rank | 61.66% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 192, 22.43%, see rank | 26.02% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 120, 14.02%, see rank | 12.31% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 8, 0.93%, see rank | 2.44% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 17, 1.99%, see rank | 1.55% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 15, 1.75%, see rank | 0.86% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.74% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 80, 9.35%, see rank | 4.70% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
