New Ulm Public School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | New Ulm Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 8,617, see rank, 100% | 2,364,149 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,175, 94.87%, see rank | 89.48% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 6,381, 74.05%, see rank | 64.51% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,794, 20.82%, see rank | 24.96% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 442, 5.13%, see rank | 10.52% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 78, 0.91%, see rank | 1.22% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 105, 1.22%, see rank | 0.96% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 24, 0.28%, see rank | 0.68% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 17, 0.20%, see rank | 5.29% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 218, 2.53%, see rank | 2.36% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | New Ulm Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 8,456, see rank, 100% | 2,347,201 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,033, 95.00%, see rank | 88.92% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 6,342, 75.00%, see rank | 64.92% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,691, 20.00%, see rank | 24.00% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 423, 5.00%, see rank | 11.08% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 146, 1.73%, see rank | 2.05% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 70, 0.83%, see rank | 1.31% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 29, 0.34%, see rank | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 44, 0.52%, see rank | 5.56% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 134, 1.58%, see rank | 1.74% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | New Ulm Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 8,524, see rank, 100% | 2,347,928 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,159, 95.72%, see rank | 89.52% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 6,431, 75.45%, see rank | 65.36% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,728, 20.27%, see rank | 24.16% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 365, 4.28%, see rank | 10.48% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 48, 0.56%, see rank | 1.35% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 95, 1.11%, see rank | 1.13% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 45, 0.53%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 20, 0.23%, see rank | 5.04% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 157, 1.84%, see rank | 2.29% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | New Ulm Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 8,561, see rank, 100% | 2,327,948 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,114, 94.78%, see rank | 89.60% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 6,448, 75.32%, see rank | 66.50% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,666, 19.46%, see rank | 23.10% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 447, 5.22%, see rank | 10.40% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 106, 1.24%, see rank | 1.56% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 103, 1.20%, see rank | 1.22% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 49, 0.57%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 23, 0.27%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 166, 1.94%, see rank | 2.09% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | New Ulm Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 8,607, see rank, 100% | 2,301,307 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 8,221, 95.52%, see rank | 89.60% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 6,495, 75.46%, see rank | 67.07% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 1,726, 20.05%, see rank | 22.53% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 386, 4.48%, see rank | 10.40% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 124, 1.44%, see rank | 1.66% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 103, 1.20%, see rank | 1.16% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 53, 0.62%, see rank | 0.72% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 11, 0.13%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 95, 1.10%, see rank | 1.99% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
