Badger Public School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Badger Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 576, see rank, 100% | 2,364,149 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 497, 86.28%, see rank | 89.48% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 403, 69.97%, see rank | 64.51% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 94, 16.32%, see rank | 24.96% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 79, 13.72%, see rank | 10.52% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 10, 1.74%, see rank | 1.22% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.96% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.68% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 13, 2.26%, see rank | 5.29% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 56, 9.72%, see rank | 2.36% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Badger Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 556, see rank, 100% | 2,347,201 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 469, 84.35%, see rank | 88.92% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 396, 71.22%, see rank | 64.92% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 73, 13.13%, see rank | 24.00% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 87, 15.65%, see rank | 11.08% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 11, 1.98%, see rank | 2.05% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 24, 4.32%, see rank | 1.31% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 2, 0.36%, see rank | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 15, 2.70%, see rank | 5.56% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 35, 6.29%, see rank | 1.74% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Badger Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 574, see rank, 100% | 2,347,928 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 495, 86.24%, see rank | 89.52% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 411, 71.60%, see rank | 65.36% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 84, 14.63%, see rank | 24.16% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 79, 13.76%, see rank | 10.48% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 15, 2.61%, see rank | 1.35% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 10, 1.74%, see rank | 1.13% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 8, 1.39%, see rank | 5.04% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 46, 8.01%, see rank | 2.29% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Badger Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 565, see rank, 100% | 2,327,948 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 468, 82.83%, see rank | 89.60% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 388, 68.67%, see rank | 66.50% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 80, 14.16%, see rank | 23.10% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 97, 17.17%, see rank | 10.40% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 20, 3.54%, see rank | 1.56% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 10, 1.77%, see rank | 1.22% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 8, 1.42%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 59, 10.44%, see rank | 2.09% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Badger Public School District | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 559, see rank, 100% | 2,301,307 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 482, 86.23%, see rank | 89.60% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 400, 71.56%, see rank | 67.07% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 82, 14.67%, see rank | 22.53% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 77, 13.77%, see rank | 10.40% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 21, 3.76%, see rank | 1.66% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 11, 1.97%, see rank | 1.16% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.72% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 7, 1.25%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 38, 6.80%, see rank | 1.99% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
