Brandon School District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Brandon School District | Michigan | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,431, see rank, 100% | 4,532,719 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 6,013, 93.50%, see rank | 84.45% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,488, 85.34%, see rank | 60.41% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 525, 8.16%, see rank | 24.04% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 418, 6.50%, see rank | 15.55% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 45, 0.70%, see rank | 1.84% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 143, 2.22%, see rank | 1.40% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 27, 0.42%, see rank | 1.04% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 99, 1.54%, see rank | 6.26% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 104, 1.62%, see rank | 4.96% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Brandon School District | Michigan | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,451, see rank, 100% | 4,532,233 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 5,976, 92.64%, see rank | 85.44% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,482, 84.98%, see rank | 61.63% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 494, 7.66%, see rank | 23.81% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 475, 7.36%, see rank | 14.56% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 69, 1.07%, see rank | 3.13% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 171, 2.65%, see rank | 1.70% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 31, 0.48%, see rank | 0.54% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 104, 1.61%, see rank | 5.80% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 100, 1.55%, see rank | 3.34% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Brandon School District | Michigan | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,364, see rank, 100% | 4,531,958 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 5,923, 93.07%, see rank | 84.27% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,438, 85.45%, see rank | 61.35% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 485, 7.62%, see rank | 22.92% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 441, 6.93%, see rank | 15.73% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 51, 0.80%, see rank | 2.16% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 146, 2.29%, see rank | 1.80% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.04% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 121, 1.90%, see rank | 6.12% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 123, 1.93%, see rank | 4.57% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Brandon School District | Michigan | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,423, see rank, 100% | 4,529,680 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 5,941, 92.50%, see rank | 84.86% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,540, 86.25%, see rank | 62.97% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 401, 6.24%, see rank | 21.89% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 482, 7.50%, see rank | 15.14% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 38, 0.59%, see rank | 2.34% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 176, 2.74%, see rank | 2.02% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.05% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 218, 3.39%, see rank | 5.89% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 50, 0.78%, see rank | 3.80% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Brandon School District | Michigan | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 6,444, see rank, 100% | 4,522,600 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 5,956, 92.43%, see rank | 85.35% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 5,581, 86.61%, see rank | 63.68% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 375, 5.82%, see rank | 21.67% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 488, 7.57%, see rank | 14.65% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 9, 0.14%, see rank | 2.36% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 225, 3.49%, see rank | 2.04% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.05% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 209, 3.24%, see rank | 5.76% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 45, 0.70%, see rank | 3.41% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
