New Plymouth School District 372 Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | New Plymouth School District 372 | Idaho | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,970, see rank, 100% | 675,421 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,781, 90.41%, see rank | 86.65% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,359, 68.98%, see rank | 59.96% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 422, 21.42%, see rank | 26.69% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 189, 9.59%, see rank | 13.35% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.70% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 36, 1.83%, see rank | 1.36% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.97% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 29, 1.47%, see rank | 6.67% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.10% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 124, 6.29%, see rank | 2.54% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | New Plymouth School District 372 | Idaho | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,733, see rank, 100% | 667,796 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,628, 93.94%, see rank | 86.76% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,252, 72.24%, see rank | 60.63% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 376, 21.70%, see rank | 26.13% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 105, 6.06%, see rank | 13.24% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 19, 1.10%, see rank | 2.45% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 27, 1.56%, see rank | 1.92% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 5, 0.29%, see rank | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 17, 0.98%, see rank | 6.24% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 5, 0.29%, see rank | 0.09% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 32, 1.85%, see rank | 2.06% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | New Plymouth School District 372 | Idaho | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,896, see rank, 100% | 666,718 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,744, 91.98%, see rank | 86.64% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,444, 76.16%, see rank | 60.72% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 300, 15.82%, see rank | 25.92% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 152, 8.02%, see rank | 13.36% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.00% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 32, 1.69%, see rank | 1.57% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.81% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 25, 1.32%, see rank | 6.26% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.11% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 95, 5.01%, see rank | 2.61% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | New Plymouth School District 372 | Idaho | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,734, see rank, 100% | 652,323 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,537, 88.64%, see rank | 87.42% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,240, 71.51%, see rank | 62.06% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 297, 17.13%, see rank | 25.36% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 197, 11.36%, see rank | 12.58% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.94% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 71, 4.09%, see rank | 1.63% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.85% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 50, 2.88%, see rank | 5.60% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.17% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 76, 4.38%, see rank | 2.39% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | New Plymouth School District 372 | Idaho | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 1,724, see rank, 100% | 626,901 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 1,516, 87.94%, see rank | 88.17% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,253, 72.68%, see rank | 62.82% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 263, 15.26%, see rank | 25.35% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 208, 12.06%, see rank | 11.83% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 32, 1.86%, see rank | 1.77% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 68, 3.94%, see rank | 1.42% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.86% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 47, 2.73%, see rank | 5.27% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 61, 3.54%, see rank | 2.34% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
