Cedar Unified District Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Cedar Unified District | Arizona | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 2,945, see rank, 100% | 2,874,548 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 2,042, 69.34%, see rank | 83.05% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,509, 51.24%, see rank | 52.64% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 533, 18.10%, see rank | 30.40% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 903, 30.66%, see rank | 16.95% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 33, 1.12%, see rank | 3.14% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.82% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 5, 0.17%, see rank | 1.16% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 622, 21.12%, see rank | 7.36% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 243, 8.25%, see rank | 3.44% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Cedar Unified District | Arizona | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 2,856, see rank, 100% | 2,844,526 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 2,137, 74.82%, see rank | 83.70% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,615, 56.55%, see rank | 55.25% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 522, 18.28%, see rank | 28.45% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 719, 25.18%, see rank | 16.30% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 41, 1.44%, see rank | 4.24% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 6, 0.21%, see rank | 2.26% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 10, 0.35%, see rank | 0.56% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 405, 14.18%, see rank | 6.48% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 257, 9.00%, see rank | 2.73% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Cedar Unified District | Arizona | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 2,942, see rank, 100% | 2,841,432 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 2,105, 71.55%, see rank | 82.96% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,545, 52.52%, see rank | 54.36% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 560, 19.03%, see rank | 28.59% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 837, 28.45%, see rank | 17.04% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 33, 1.12%, see rank | 3.44% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.10% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 16, 0.54%, see rank | 1.14% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 591, 20.09%, see rank | 6.79% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 197, 6.70%, see rank | 3.54% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Cedar Unified District | Arizona | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 3,042, see rank, 100% | 2,776,037 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 2,435, 80.05%, see rank | 83.81% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,682, 55.29%, see rank | 56.50% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 753, 24.75%, see rank | 27.30% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 607, 19.95%, see rank | 16.19% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 37, 1.22%, see rank | 3.16% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 2.21% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 11, 0.36%, see rank | 1.27% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 421, 13.84%, see rank | 6.28% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 138, 4.54%, see rank | 3.24% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Cedar Unified District | Arizona | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 3,005, see rank, 100% | 2,657,551 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 2,403, 79.97%, see rank | 84.60% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 1,738, 57.84%, see rank | 57.77% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 665, 22.13%, see rank | 26.82% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 602, 20.03%, see rank | 15.40% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 17, 0.57%, see rank | 3.01% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 1.94% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 11, 0.37%, see rank | 1.37% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 440, 14.64%, see rank | 6.04% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 0, 0.00%, see rank | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 134, 4.46%, see rank | 3.01% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
