USA.com / Vermont / Rutland County / Rutland, VT / Population and Races / Historical Marital Status Data
Rutland, VT Historical Marital Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
Total population: 16,217
| Rutland, VT | % | Vermont | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 13,650 | see rank | 525,036 | 252,974,135 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 6,203 | 100%, see rank | 256,277 | 123,281,364 |
| Never Married | 2,186 | 35.24%, see rank | 34.07% | 35.77% |
| Married | 3,006 | 48.46%, see rank | 52.46% | 52.04% |
| Widowed | 189 | 3.05%, see rank | 2.36% | 2.57% |
| Divorced | 822 | 13.25%, see rank | 11.11% | 9.62% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 7,447 | 100%, see rank | 268,759 | 129,692,771 |
| Never Married | 2,076 | 27.88%, see rank | 27.87% | 29.48% |
| Married | 3,078 | 41.33%, see rank | 50.61% | 49.19% |
| Widowed | 886 | 11.90%, see rank | 8.49% | 9.16% |
| Divorced | 1,407 | 18.89%, see rank | 13.02% | 12.16% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
Total population: 16,478
| Rutland, VT | % | Vermont | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 13,663 | see rank | 521,944 | 248,042,237 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 6,141 | 100%, see rank | 254,907 | 120,789,875 |
| Never Married | 2,149 | 34.99%, see rank | 33.40% | 35.08% |
| Married | 2,991 | 48.71%, see rank | 53.35% | 52.93% |
| Widowed | 161 | 2.62%, see rank | 2.30% | 2.53% |
| Divorced | 840 | 13.68%, see rank | 10.94% | 9.46% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 7,522 | 100%, see rank | 267,037 | 127,252,362 |
| Never Married | 2,170 | 28.85%, see rank | 27.24% | 28.74% |
| Married | 2,928 | 38.93%, see rank | 51.04% | 49.95% |
| Widowed | 1,075 | 14.29%, see rank | 8.76% | 9.34% |
| Divorced | 1,349 | 17.93%, see rank | 12.95% | 11.97% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
Total population: 16,739
| Rutland, VT | % | Vermont | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 13,825 | see rank | 518,129 | 243,073,468 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 6,335 | 100%, see rank | 252,945 | 118,264,295 |
| Never Married | 2,322 | 36.65%, see rank | 32.97% | 34.21% |
| Married | 2,965 | 46.80%, see rank | 53.97% | 54.02% |
| Widowed | 125 | 1.97%, see rank | 2.42% | 2.52% |
| Divorced | 923 | 14.57%, see rank | 10.64% | 9.25% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 7,490 | 100%, see rank | 265,184 | 124,809,173 |
| Never Married | 2,107 | 28.13%, see rank | 26.45% | 27.93% |
| Married | 2,831 | 37.80%, see rank | 51.39% | 50.85% |
| Widowed | 1,110 | 14.82%, see rank | 8.86% | 9.55% |
| Divorced | 1,442 | 19.25%, see rank | 13.29% | 11.66% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
Total population: 16,770
| Rutland, VT | % | Vermont | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 13,845 | see rank | 515,802 | 240,146,935 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 6,279 | 100%, see rank | 251,259 | 117,166,601 |
| Never Married | 2,216 | 35.29%, see rank | 33.44% | 34.13% |
| Married | 2,834 | 45.13%, see rank | 53.34% | 54.15% |
| Widowed | 159 | 2.53%, see rank | 2.44% | 2.53% |
| Divorced | 1,070 | 17.04%, see rank | 10.77% | 9.19% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 7,566 | 100%, see rank | 264,543 | 122,980,334 |
| Never Married | 2,098 | 27.73%, see rank | 26.93% | 27.67% |
| Married | 2,863 | 37.84%, see rank | 50.43% | 50.88% |
| Widowed | 1,140 | 15.07%, see rank | 9.21% | 9.85% |
| Divorced | 1,465 | 19.36%, see rank | 13.43% | 11.60% |
US Census 2000 data
Total population: 17,292
| Rutland, VT | % | Vermont | U.S. | |
| 15 Years and Over Total | 14,019 | see rank | 488,281 | 221,148,671 |
| Males, 15 Years and Over | 6,463 | 100%, see rank | 236,517 | 107,027,405 |
| Never Married | 2,123 | 32.85%, see rank | 29.72% | 30.26% |
| Married | 3,219 | 49.81%, see rank | 58.30% | 58.58% |
| Widowed | 282 | 4.36%, see rank | 2.41% | 2.52% |
| Divorced | 839 | 12.98%, see rank | 9.57% | 8.65% |
| Females, 15 Years and Over | 7,556 | 100%, see rank | 251,764 | 114,121,266 |
| Never Married | 1,946 | 25.75%, see rank | 23.88% | 24.13% |
| Married | 3,248 | 42.99%, see rank | 54.64% | 54.60% |
| Widowed | 1,183 | 15.66%, see rank | 9.98% | 10.49% |
| Divorced | 1,179 | 15.60%, see rank | 11.49% | 10.78% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.