Rochester Metro Area Historical House Occupancy Status Data
ACS 2010-2014 data
| | Rochester Area | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 88,911, see rank, 100% | 2,364,149 | 132,741,033 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 82,643, 92.95%, see rank | 89.48% | 87.55% |
| Owner Occupied | 63,062, 70.93%, see rank | 64.51% | 56.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 19,581, 22.02%, see rank | 24.96% | 31.21% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 6,268, 7.05%, see rank | 10.52% | 12.45% |
| For Rent | 1,382, 1.55%, see rank | 1.22% | 2.34% |
| For Sale Only | 812, 0.91%, see rank | 0.96% | 1.20% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 747, 0.84%, see rank | 0.68% | 0.92% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 1,389, 1.56%, see rank | 5.29% | 3.97% |
| For Migrant Workers | 30, 0.03%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,908, 2.15%, see rank | 2.36% | 4.00% |
US Census 2010 data
| | Rochester Area | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 78,439, see rank, 100% | 2,347,201 | 131,704,730 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 73,362, 93.53%, see rank | 88.92% | 88.62% |
| Owner Occupied | 56,191, 71.64%, see rank | 64.92% | 57.69% |
| Renter Occupied | 17,171, 21.89%, see rank | 24.00% | 30.93% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,077, 6.47%, see rank | 11.08% | 11.38% |
| For Rent | 1,433, 1.83%, see rank | 2.05% | 3.14% |
| For Sale Only | 1,136, 1.45%, see rank | 1.31% | 1.44% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 305, 0.39%, see rank | 0.40% | 0.48% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 970, 1.24%, see rank | 5.56% | 3.53% |
| For Migrant Workers | 76, 0.10%, see rank | 0.01% | 0.02% |
| Other Vacant | 1,157, 1.48%, see rank | 1.74% | 2.77% |
ACS 2008-2012 data
| | Rochester Area | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 78,479, see rank, 100% | 2,347,928 | 131,642,457 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 73,044, 93.07%, see rank | 89.52% | 87.53% |
| Owner Occupied | 56,448, 71.93%, see rank | 65.36% | 57.34% |
| Renter Occupied | 16,596, 21.15%, see rank | 24.16% | 30.19% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,435, 6.93%, see rank | 10.48% | 12.47% |
| For Rent | 1,548, 1.97%, see rank | 1.35% | 2.50% |
| For Sale Only | 903, 1.15%, see rank | 1.13% | 1.38% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 447, 0.57%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.91% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 790, 1.01%, see rank | 5.04% | 3.81% |
| For Migrant Workers | 44, 0.06%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,703, 2.17%, see rank | 2.29% | 3.84% |
ACS 2006-2010 data
| | Rochester Area | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 77,533, see rank, 100% | 2,327,948 | 130,038,080 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 72,166, 93.08%, see rank | 89.60% | 87.85% |
| Owner Occupied | 56,479, 72.85%, see rank | 66.50% | 58.51% |
| Renter Occupied | 15,687, 20.23%, see rank | 23.10% | 29.33% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,367, 6.92%, see rank | 10.40% | 12.15% |
| For Rent | 1,641, 2.12%, see rank | 1.56% | 2.53% |
| For Sale Only | 1,162, 1.50%, see rank | 1.22% | 1.45% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 474, 0.61%, see rank | 0.66% | 0.95% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 700, 0.90%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.60% |
| For Migrant Workers | 33, 0.04%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,357, 1.75%, see rank | 2.09% | 3.59% |
ACS 2005-2009 data
| | Rochester Area | Minnesota | U.S. |
| Total Housing Units | 76,965, see rank, 100% | 2,301,307 | 127,699,712 |
| Occupied Housing Units | 71,390, 92.76%, see rank | 89.60% | 88.18% |
| Owner Occupied | 56,270, 73.11%, see rank | 67.07% | 58.98% |
| Renter Occupied | 15,120, 19.65%, see rank | 22.53% | 29.20% |
| Vacant Housing Units | 5,575, 7.24%, see rank | 10.40% | 11.82% |
| For Rent | 1,720, 2.23%, see rank | 1.66% | 2.52% |
| For Sale Only | 1,298, 1.69%, see rank | 1.16% | 1.39% |
| Rented or Sold, Not Occupied | 504, 0.65%, see rank | 0.72% | 0.99% |
| For Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use | 751, 0.98%, see rank | 4.85% | 3.45% |
| For Migrant Workers | 35, 0.05%, see rank | 0.02% | 0.03% |
| Other Vacant | 1,267, 1.65%, see rank | 1.99% | 3.44% |
* ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.
