Local Data Search
A total of 254 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Vacant Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 56.8% | Kenedy, TX / 451 |
| 2. | 52.6% | Real, TX / 3,326 |
| 3. | 50.0% | Loving, TX / 85 |
| 4. | 49.5% | Terrell, TX / 1,001 |
| 5. | 47.8% | Menard, TX / 2,232 |
| 6. | 47.4% | Coke, TX / 3,298 |
| 7. | 47.1% | Edwards, TX / 2,023 |
| 8. | 46.6% | Sabine, TX / 10,642 |
| 9. | 46.0% | Trinity, TX / 14,466 |
| 10. | 43.6% | Concho, TX / 4,073 |
| 11. | 42.7% | Kimble, TX / 4,577 |
| 12. | 42.3% | Jeff Davis, TX / 2,319 |
| 13. | 42.0% | Mcmullen, TX / 696 |
| 14. | 40.4% | Llano, TX / 19,115 |
| 15. | 40.3% | Motley, TX / 1,153 |
| 16. | 39.3% | Baylor, TX / 3,706 |
| 17. | 38.6% | Mills, TX / 4,880 |
| 18. | 37.9% | Kinney, TX / 3,574 |
| 19. | 37.3% | Donley, TX / 3,652 |
| 20. | 37.1% | San Augustine, TX / 8,898 |
| 21. | 37.0% | Live Oak, TX / 11,526 |
| 22. | 36.5% | Coleman, TX / 8,817 |
| 23. | 35.9% | Aransas, TX / 23,391 |
| 24. | 35.9% | Dickens, TX / 2,399 |
| 25. | 35.6% | King, TX / 227 |
| 26. | 35.3% | San Saba, TX / 6,037 |
| 27. | 34.9% | Borden, TX / 642 |
| 28. | 34.6% | Hall, TX / 3,337 |
| 29. | 33.8% | Sutton, TX / 4,123 |
| 30. | 33.3% | Mason, TX / 3,978 |
| 31. | 32.7% | Throckmorton, TX / 1,626 |
| 32. | 32.5% | Mitchell, TX / 9,367 |
| 33. | 32.5% | Glasscock, TX / 1,255 |
| 34. | 32.4% | Hamilton, TX / 8,448 |
| 35. | 32.3% | Briscoe, TX / 1,674 |
| 36. | 32.1% | Leon, TX / 16,827 |
| 37. | 31.5% | Houston, TX / 23,512 |
| 38. | 31.5% | Foard, TX / 1,273 |
| 39. | 31.3% | Calhoun, TX / 21,366 |
| 40. | 31.3% | Stonewall, TX / 1,447 |
| 41. | 30.9% | Presidio, TX / 7,678 |
| 42. | 30.6% | Palo Pinto, TX / 28,010 |
| 43. | 30.5% | Duval, TX / 11,821 |
| 44. | 30.2% | Eastland, TX / 18,519 |
| 45. | 29.9% | Zapata, TX / 14,014 |
| 46. | 29.7% | Madison, TX / 13,590 |
| 47. | 29.6% | San Jacinto, TX / 26,482 |
| 48. | 29.3% | Robertson, TX / 16,596 |
| 49. | 29.2% | Matagorda, TX / 36,653 |
| 50. | 29.2% | Jim Hogg, TX / 5,257 |
| 51. | 29.0% | Mcculloch, TX / 8,281 |
| 52. | 28.7% | Burleson, TX / 17,160 |
| 53. | 28.4% | Hudspeth, TX / 3,407 |
| 54. | 28.3% | Haskell, TX / 5,891 |
| 55. | 28.2% | Bosque, TX / 18,114 |
| 56. | 28.1% | Stephens, TX / 9,561 |
| 57. | 28.0% | Cottle, TX / 1,600 |
| 58. | 27.9% | Irion, TX / 1,596 |
| 59. | 27.8% | Hardeman, TX / 4,124 |
| 60. | 27.8% | Red River, TX / 12,795 |
| 61. | 27.7% | Kent, TX / 829 |
| 62. | 27.6% | Newton, TX / 14,372 |
| 63. | 27.3% | Brown, TX / 38,018 |
| 64. | 26.9% | Fisher, TX / 3,963 |
| 65. | 26.9% | Crockett, TX / 3,669 |
| 66. | 26.9% | Franklin, TX / 10,593 |
| 67. | 26.7% | Comanche, TX / 13,875 |
| 68. | 26.6% | La Salle, TX / 6,850 |
| 69. | 26.6% | Sterling, TX / 1,223 |
| 70. | 26.1% | Bandera, TX / 20,477 |
| 71. | 26.0% | Jack, TX / 9,027 |
| 72. | 25.9% | Marion, TX / 10,544 |
| 73. | 25.7% | Falls, TX / 17,756 |
| 74. | 25.5% | Armstrong, TX / 1,820 |
| 75. | 25.4% | Reeves, TX / 13,606 |
| 76. | 25.3% | Refugio, TX / 7,352 |
| 77. | 25.2% | Polk, TX / 45,618 |
| 78. | 25.0% | Runnels, TX / 10,473 |
| 79. | 24.9% | Jones, TX / 20,137 |
| 80. | 24.9% | De Witt, TX / 20,156 |
| 80. | 24.9% | Blanco, TX / 10,425 |
| 82. | 24.8% | Limestone, TX / 23,350 |
| 83. | 24.7% | Crosby, TX / 6,100 |
| 84. | 24.6% | Schleicher, TX / 3,327 |
| 85. | 24.6% | Culberson, TX / 2,386 |
| 86. | 23.9% | Freestone, TX / 19,631 |
| 87. | 23.8% | Fayette, TX / 24,557 |
| 88. | 23.7% | Lavaca, TX / 19,269 |
| 89. | 23.6% | Willacy, TX / 21,983 |
| 90. | 23.4% | Henderson, TX / 78,558 |
| 91. | 23.3% | Wood, TX / 41,927 |
| 91. | 23.3% | Brewster, TX / 9,175 |
| 93. | 23.3% | Colorado, TX / 20,784 |
| 94. | 23.1% | Collingsworth, TX / 3,050 |
| 95. | 23.1% | Garza, TX / 6,295 |
| 96. | 22.9% | Camp, TX / 12,389 |
| 97. | 22.7% | Shackelford, TX / 3,346 |
| 98. | 22.7% | Tyler, TX / 21,638 |
| 99. | 22.6% | Gonzales, TX / 19,773 |
| 100. | 22.5% | Roberts, TX / 992 |
| 101. | 22.5% | Brooks, TX / 7,236 |
| 102. | 22.1% | Knox, TX / 3,713 |
| 103. | 21.7% | Hutchinson, TX / 21,992 |
| 104. | 21.6% | Cochran, TX / 3,087 |
| 105. | 21.2% | Jackson, TX / 14,075 |
| 106. | 21.0% | Dimmit, TX / 10,054 |
| 107. | 20.8% | Delta, TX / 5,240 |
| 108. | 20.6% | Callahan, TX / 13,521 |
| 109. | 20.6% | Upton, TX / 3,300 |
| 110. | 20.5% | Washington, TX / 33,628 |
| 111. | 20.5% | Oldham, TX / 2,048 |
| 111. | 20.5% | Lamb, TX / 13,996 |
| 113. | 20.5% | Montague, TX / 19,737 |
| 114. | 20.3% | Karnes, TX / 14,936 |
| 115. | 20.2% | Burnet, TX / 42,946 |
| 116. | 20.1% | Nolan, TX / 15,104 |
| 117. | 20.0% | Uvalde, TX / 26,434 |
| 118. | 19.9% | Lipscomb, TX / 3,324 |
| 119. | 19.8% | Grimes, TX / 26,564 |
| 120. | 19.8% | Val Verde, TX / 48,578 |
| 121. | 19.6% | Lee, TX / 16,591 |
| 122. | 19.6% | Starr, TX / 60,882 |
| 123. | 19.1% | Anderson, TX / 58,269 |
| 124. | 19.0% | Archer, TX / 8,944 |
| 125. | 18.9% | Rains, TX / 10,976 |
| 126. | 18.9% | Wilbarger, TX / 13,451 |
| 127. | 18.9% | Panola, TX / 23,814 |
| 127. | 18.9% | Coryell, TX / 75,728 |
| 129. | 18.8% | Swisher, TX / 7,816 |
| 130. | 18.8% | Bee, TX / 32,083 |
| 131. | 18.6% | Lynn, TX / 5,886 |
| 132. | 18.6% | Hemphill, TX / 3,863 |
| 133. | 18.5% | Reagan, TX / 3,384 |
| 134. | 18.4% | Cass, TX / 30,324 |
| 135. | 18.3% | Lampasas, TX / 19,837 |
| 136. | 18.3% | Jasper, TX / 35,703 |
| 137. | 18.2% | Childress, TX / 7,047 |
| 138. | 18.1% | Galveston, TX / 292,874 |
| 139. | 18.0% | Castro, TX / 7,984 |
| 140. | 18.0% | Cameron, TX / 405,819 |
| 141. | 18.0% | Hansford, TX / 5,556 |
| 142. | 18.0% | Shelby, TX / 25,602 |
| 143. | 17.9% | Bailey, TX / 7,096 |
| 144. | 17.7% | Dallam, TX / 6,734 |
| 145. | 17.7% | Goliad, TX / 7,223 |
| 146. | 17.5% | Frio, TX / 17,265 |
| 147. | 17.4% | Bell, TX / 310,155 |
| 148. | 17.4% | Austin, TX / 28,372 |
| 149. | 17.1% | Cherokee, TX / 50,690 |
| 150. | 17.1% | Clay, TX / 10,718 |
| 151. | 16.9% | Milam, TX / 24,691 |
| 151. | 16.9% | Walker, TX / 67,447 |
| 153. | 16.8% | Zavala, TX / 11,753 |
| 154. | 16.8% | Morris, TX / 12,914 |
| 155. | 16.7% | Gray, TX / 22,731 |
| 156. | 16.7% | Fannin, TX / 33,867 |
| 157. | 16.6% | Martin, TX / 4,804 |
| 158. | 16.5% | Hood, TX / 51,161 |
| 159. | 16.5% | Harrison, TX / 65,958 |
| 160. | 16.4% | San Patricio, TX / 65,352 |
| 161. | 16.4% | Ward, TX / 10,705 |
| 162. | 16.3% | Young, TX / 18,368 |
| 163. | 16.2% | Dawson, TX / 13,761 |
| 164. | 16.2% | Jim Wells, TX / 41,014 |
| 165. | 16.2% | Sherman, TX / 3,040 |
| 166. | 16.1% | Hunt, TX / 85,955 |
| 167. | 16.1% | Hill, TX / 35,079 |
| 168. | 16.0% | Carson, TX / 6,215 |
| 169. | 15.8% | Terry, TX / 12,561 |
| 170. | 15.7% | Howard, TX / 34,927 |
| 171. | 15.7% | Pecos, TX / 15,510 |
| 172. | 15.7% | Erath, TX / 38,192 |
| 173. | 15.5% | Gillespie, TX / 24,777 |
| 174. | 15.4% | Nacogdoches, TX / 64,647 |
| 175. | 15.1% | Liberty, TX / 75,662 |
| 176. | 15.1% | Caldwell, TX / 38,152 |
| 177. | 15.1% | Van Zandt, TX / 52,507 |
| 178. | 14.8% | Rusk, TX / 53,211 |
| 179. | 14.7% | Wharton, TX / 41,153 |
| 180. | 14.6% | Atascosa, TX / 45,091 |
| 181. | 14.5% | Waller, TX / 42,894 |
| 182. | 14.4% | Lamar, TX / 49,740 |
| 183. | 14.2% | Hockley, TX / 22,988 |
| 184. | 14.1% | Hidalgo, TX / 774,820 |
| 185. | 14.0% | Kerr, TX / 49,469 |
| 186. | 13.9% | Wise, TX / 59,351 |
| 187. | 13.8% | Kleberg, TX / 31,925 |
| 188. | 13.8% | Navarro, TX / 47,739 |
| 189. | 13.8% | Gaines, TX / 17,572 |
| 190. | 13.7% | Medina, TX / 46,009 |
| 191. | 13.7% | Floyd, TX / 6,439 |
| 192. | 13.6% | Hale, TX / 36,153 |
| 192. | 13.6% | Moore, TX / 21,765 |
| 194. | 13.5% | Wichita, TX / 131,019 |
| 195. | 13.4% | Angelina, TX / 86,550 |
| 196. | 13.3% | Grayson, TX / 120,641 |
| 197. | 13.3% | Wheeler, TX / 5,414 |
| 198. | 13.2% | Nueces, TX / 340,568 |
| 199. | 13.1% | Parmer, TX / 10,172 |
| 200. | 13.1% | Comal, TX / 108,985 |
| 201. | 12.6% | Cooke, TX / 38,427 |
| 202. | 12.5% | Bastrop, TX / 74,023 |
| 203. | 12.4% | Yoakum, TX / 7,918 |
| 204. | 12.3% | Scurry, TX / 16,855 |
| 205. | 12.1% | Bowie, TX / 92,460 |
| 206. | 12.0% | Hartley, TX / 6,015 |
| 207. | 12.0% | Orange, TX / 82,306 |
| 208. | 12.0% | Winkler, TX / 7,137 |
| 209. | 11.7% | Harris, TX / 4,101,752 |
| 210. | 11.7% | Maverick, TX / 54,107 |
| 211. | 11.7% | Mclennan, TX / 234,626 |
| 212. | 11.7% | Upshur, TX / 39,386 |
| 213. | 11.7% | Hopkins, TX / 35,088 |
| 214. | 11.6% | Somervell, TX / 8,444 |
| 215. | 11.5% | Chambers, TX / 34,562 |
| 216. | 11.4% | Deaf Smith, TX / 19,275 |
| 217. | 11.4% | Taylor, TX / 131,425 |
| 218. | 11.3% | Jefferson, TX / 251,627 |
| 219. | 11.3% | Titus, TX / 32,045 |
| 220. | 11.2% | Brazos, TX / 194,087 |
| 221. | 11.1% | Andrews, TX / 15,006 |
| 222. | 10.8% | Brazoria, TX / 313,813 |
| 223. | 10.6% | Potter, TX / 121,099 |
| 224. | 10.3% | Smith, TX / 209,691 |
| 225. | 10.2% | Tom Green, TX / 110,434 |
| 226. | 10.0% | Dallas, TX / 2,379,214 |
| 227. | 9.9% | Montgomery, TX / 458,339 |
| 228. | 9.8% | Parker, TX / 116,820 |
| 229. | 9.7% | Victoria, TX / 87,188 |
| 230. | 9.7% | Bexar, TX / 1,719,902 |
| 231. | 9.6% | Kendall, TX / 33,745 |
| 232. | 9.4% | Hardin, TX / 54,497 |
| 233. | 9.3% | Lubbock, TX / 278,339 |
| 234. | 9.2% | Guadalupe, TX / 131,945 |
| 234. | 9.2% | Gregg, TX / 121,451 |
| 236. | 9.1% | Kaufman, TX / 103,385 |
| 237. | 8.9% | Webb, TX / 250,320 |
| 237. | 8.9% | Hays, TX / 158,464 |
| 239. | 8.7% | Wilson, TX / 42,999 |
| 240. | 8.7% | Johnson, TX / 151,174 |
| 241. | 8.7% | Tarrant, TX / 1,814,667 |
| 242. | 8.2% | Travis, TX / 1,034,842 |
| 243. | 8.1% | Randall, TX / 121,090 |
| 244. | 8.1% | Midland, TX / 138,472 |
| 245. | 7.8% | Ector, TX / 138,193 |
| 246. | 7.8% | Ochiltree, TX / 10,314 |
| 247. | 7.4% | Ellis, TX / 149,712 |
| 248. | 7.1% | Denton, TX / 667,934 |
| 249. | 6.9% | El Paso, TX / 801,115 |
| 250. | 6.5% | Rockwall, TX / 78,749 |
| 251. | 6.5% | Williamson, TX / 426,296 |
| 252. | 6.1% | Collin, TX / 788,580 |
| 253. | 6.0% | Fort Bend, TX / 587,666 |
| 254. | 5.1% | Crane, TX / 4,359 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Vacant Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Vacant Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.