Local Data Search
A total of 250 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Public College Enrollment Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 100.0% | Dickens, TX / 2,399 |
| 1. | 100.0% | King, TX / 227 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Runnels, TX / 10,473 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Mcmullen, TX / 696 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Borden, TX / 642 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Sherman, TX / 3,040 |
| 1. | 100.0% | San Saba, TX / 6,037 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Sabine, TX / 10,642 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Brooks, TX / 7,236 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Sterling, TX / 1,223 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Kenedy, TX / 451 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Irion, TX / 1,596 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Ward, TX / 10,705 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Jeff Davis, TX / 2,319 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Glasscock, TX / 1,255 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Jim Hogg, TX / 5,257 |
| 1. | 100.0% | Motley, TX / 1,153 |
| 18. | 99.1% | Reeves, TX / 13,606 |
| 19. | 98.9% | Somervell, TX / 8,444 |
| 20. | 98.4% | Robertson, TX / 16,596 |
| 21. | 98.1% | Bailey, TX / 7,096 |
| 22. | 98.1% | Delta, TX / 5,240 |
| 23. | 97.9% | Hamilton, TX / 8,448 |
| 24. | 97.8% | Madison, TX / 13,590 |
| 25. | 97.3% | Sutton, TX / 4,123 |
| 26. | 97.2% | Brazos, TX / 194,087 |
| 27. | 97.0% | Goliad, TX / 7,223 |
| 28. | 96.9% | Nacogdoches, TX / 64,647 |
| 29. | 96.7% | Walker, TX / 67,447 |
| 30. | 96.6% | Calhoun, TX / 21,366 |
| 31. | 96.6% | Marion, TX / 10,544 |
| 31. | 96.6% | Hays, TX / 158,464 |
| 33. | 96.6% | Castro, TX / 7,984 |
| 34. | 96.6% | Archer, TX / 8,944 |
| 35. | 96.1% | Crane, TX / 4,359 |
| 36. | 96.0% | Yoakum, TX / 7,918 |
| 37. | 96.0% | Swisher, TX / 7,816 |
| 38. | 95.8% | Bosque, TX / 18,114 |
| 39. | 95.6% | Freestone, TX / 19,631 |
| 40. | 95.2% | Menard, TX / 2,232 |
| 41. | 94.7% | Dallam, TX / 6,734 |
| 42. | 94.6% | Blanco, TX / 10,425 |
| 43. | 94.5% | Kleberg, TX / 31,925 |
| 44. | 94.4% | Zapata, TX / 14,014 |
| 45. | 94.3% | Bandera, TX / 20,477 |
| 46. | 94.3% | Randall, TX / 121,090 |
| 47. | 94.0% | Cochran, TX / 3,087 |
| 48. | 94.0% | Refugio, TX / 7,352 |
| 49. | 93.9% | Mason, TX / 3,978 |
| 50. | 93.9% | Stephens, TX / 9,561 |
| 50. | 93.9% | Smith, TX / 209,691 |
| 52. | 93.8% | Terry, TX / 12,561 |
| 53. | 93.7% | Zavala, TX / 11,753 |
| 53. | 93.7% | Shelby, TX / 25,602 |
| 55. | 93.7% | Cass, TX / 30,324 |
| 56. | 93.7% | Baylor, TX / 3,706 |
| 57. | 93.7% | Camp, TX / 12,389 |
| 58. | 93.5% | Wise, TX / 59,351 |
| 59. | 93.5% | Edwards, TX / 2,023 |
| 60. | 93.3% | Erath, TX / 38,192 |
| 61. | 93.2% | Webb, TX / 250,320 |
| 62. | 93.1% | Mitchell, TX / 9,367 |
| 63. | 93.1% | Hartley, TX / 6,015 |
| 64. | 93.1% | Cameron, TX / 405,819 |
| 64. | 93.1% | Grimes, TX / 26,564 |
| 66. | 93.1% | Live Oak, TX / 11,526 |
| 67. | 93.0% | Navarro, TX / 47,739 |
| 68. | 93.0% | Midland, TX / 138,472 |
| 69. | 92.9% | Jefferson, TX / 251,627 |
| 70. | 92.8% | Washington, TX / 33,628 |
| 71. | 92.6% | Chambers, TX / 34,562 |
| 72. | 92.5% | Franklin, TX / 10,593 |
| 73. | 92.5% | Anderson, TX / 58,269 |
| 74. | 92.4% | Coke, TX / 3,298 |
| 75. | 92.3% | Hockley, TX / 22,988 |
| 76. | 92.2% | Clay, TX / 10,718 |
| 77. | 92.2% | Pecos, TX / 15,510 |
| 78. | 92.2% | Haskell, TX / 5,891 |
| 79. | 92.2% | Comanche, TX / 13,875 |
| 79. | 92.2% | Victoria, TX / 87,188 |
| 81. | 92.1% | Maverick, TX / 54,107 |
| 82. | 92.1% | Orange, TX / 82,306 |
| 83. | 92.1% | Ector, TX / 138,193 |
| 84. | 92.0% | Willacy, TX / 21,983 |
| 84. | 92.0% | Lipscomb, TX / 3,324 |
| 86. | 92.0% | Houston, TX / 23,512 |
| 86. | 92.0% | Lamb, TX / 13,996 |
| 88. | 91.9% | Kinney, TX / 3,574 |
| 89. | 91.9% | Galveston, TX / 292,874 |
| 90. | 91.9% | Denton, TX / 667,934 |
| 91. | 91.8% | Nueces, TX / 340,568 |
| 92. | 91.7% | Titus, TX / 32,045 |
| 93. | 91.7% | Morris, TX / 12,914 |
| 94. | 91.6% | Falls, TX / 17,756 |
| 95. | 91.4% | Hunt, TX / 85,955 |
| 95. | 91.4% | Wharton, TX / 41,153 |
| 97. | 91.1% | Caldwell, TX / 38,152 |
| 97. | 91.1% | Brewster, TX / 9,175 |
| 99. | 91.0% | Gray, TX / 22,731 |
| 100. | 90.9% | Cooke, TX / 38,427 |
| 101. | 90.7% | Tyler, TX / 21,638 |
| 102. | 90.6% | Uvalde, TX / 26,434 |
| 102. | 90.6% | Wichita, TX / 131,019 |
| 104. | 90.6% | Limestone, TX / 23,350 |
| 105. | 90.6% | Angelina, TX / 86,550 |
| 106. | 90.4% | Wheeler, TX / 5,414 |
| 107. | 90.4% | Jack, TX / 9,027 |
| 107. | 90.4% | Carson, TX / 6,215 |
| 107. | 90.4% | Lubbock, TX / 278,339 |
| 110. | 90.3% | Real, TX / 3,326 |
| 111. | 90.2% | Palo Pinto, TX / 28,010 |
| 112. | 89.9% | Karnes, TX / 14,936 |
| 112. | 89.9% | Hopkins, TX / 35,088 |
| 114. | 89.9% | Duval, TX / 11,821 |
| 115. | 89.8% | Fayette, TX / 24,557 |
| 116. | 89.8% | Jim Wells, TX / 41,014 |
| 117. | 89.8% | Hidalgo, TX / 774,820 |
| 118. | 89.6% | Tom Green, TX / 110,434 |
| 119. | 89.5% | Rusk, TX / 53,211 |
| 120. | 89.4% | Lampasas, TX / 19,837 |
| 121. | 89.4% | Leon, TX / 16,827 |
| 122. | 89.3% | Bowie, TX / 92,460 |
| 123. | 89.3% | Fisher, TX / 3,963 |
| 124. | 89.2% | El Paso, TX / 801,115 |
| 125. | 89.1% | Starr, TX / 60,882 |
| 126. | 89.1% | Lamar, TX / 49,740 |
| 127. | 89.0% | Fannin, TX / 33,867 |
| 128. | 88.9% | Kent, TX / 829 |
| 129. | 88.8% | Hardin, TX / 54,497 |
| 130. | 88.8% | Garza, TX / 6,295 |
| 131. | 88.8% | Montgomery, TX / 458,339 |
| 132. | 88.7% | Montague, TX / 19,737 |
| 133. | 88.7% | Potter, TX / 121,099 |
| 134. | 88.4% | Scurry, TX / 16,855 |
| 135. | 87.9% | Henderson, TX / 78,558 |
| 136. | 87.9% | Concho, TX / 4,073 |
| 137. | 87.9% | Liberty, TX / 75,662 |
| 138. | 87.8% | Young, TX / 18,368 |
| 139. | 87.6% | Trinity, TX / 14,466 |
| 140. | 87.6% | Brazoria, TX / 313,813 |
| 141. | 87.4% | Moore, TX / 21,765 |
| 142. | 87.4% | Collin, TX / 788,580 |
| 143. | 87.0% | Deaf Smith, TX / 19,275 |
| 144. | 87.0% | Travis, TX / 1,034,842 |
| 145. | 86.9% | Mcculloch, TX / 8,281 |
| 146. | 86.9% | San Patricio, TX / 65,352 |
| 147. | 86.8% | Upshur, TX / 39,386 |
| 148. | 86.6% | Howard, TX / 34,927 |
| 149. | 86.5% | Colorado, TX / 20,784 |
| 150. | 86.2% | Val Verde, TX / 48,578 |
| 151. | 86.2% | Panola, TX / 23,814 |
| 152. | 86.0% | De Witt, TX / 20,156 |
| 153. | 85.6% | Martin, TX / 4,804 |
| 154. | 85.6% | Nolan, TX / 15,104 |
| 155. | 85.5% | Harris, TX / 4,101,752 |
| 156. | 85.5% | Hood, TX / 51,161 |
| 157. | 85.4% | Red River, TX / 12,795 |
| 158. | 85.4% | Lynn, TX / 5,886 |
| 159. | 84.8% | Wilson, TX / 42,999 |
| 160. | 84.5% | Hansford, TX / 5,556 |
| 161. | 84.4% | Andrews, TX / 15,006 |
| 162. | 83.9% | Coryell, TX / 75,728 |
| 163. | 83.9% | Parker, TX / 116,820 |
| 164. | 83.7% | Hutchinson, TX / 21,992 |
| 165. | 83.6% | Milam, TX / 24,691 |
| 166. | 83.5% | Hall, TX / 3,337 |
| 167. | 83.4% | Kaufman, TX / 103,385 |
| 168. | 83.3% | Wilbarger, TX / 13,451 |
| 169. | 83.3% | Coleman, TX / 8,817 |
| 170. | 83.2% | Childress, TX / 7,047 |
| 171. | 83.1% | Rockwall, TX / 78,749 |
| 172. | 82.8% | Williamson, TX / 426,296 |
| 173. | 82.8% | Presidio, TX / 7,678 |
| 174. | 82.1% | Gonzales, TX / 19,773 |
| 175. | 82.1% | Hudspeth, TX / 3,407 |
| 176. | 82.1% | Bee, TX / 32,083 |
| 177. | 81.6% | Ochiltree, TX / 10,314 |
| 178. | 81.3% | Lavaca, TX / 19,269 |
| 179. | 81.2% | Fort Bend, TX / 587,666 |
| 180. | 80.8% | Johnson, TX / 151,174 |
| 181. | 80.8% | Comal, TX / 108,985 |
| 182. | 80.6% | Llano, TX / 19,115 |
| 183. | 80.5% | Medina, TX / 46,009 |
| 184. | 80.4% | Collingsworth, TX / 3,050 |
| 185. | 79.8% | Schleicher, TX / 3,327 |
| 186. | 79.5% | Eastland, TX / 18,519 |
| 187. | 79.4% | Atascosa, TX / 45,091 |
| 188. | 79.3% | Bell, TX / 310,155 |
| 189. | 79.3% | Van Zandt, TX / 52,507 |
| 190. | 79.3% | Bexar, TX / 1,719,902 |
| 191. | 79.3% | Upton, TX / 3,300 |
| 192. | 79.2% | Hill, TX / 35,079 |
| 193. | 79.2% | Tarrant, TX / 1,814,667 |
| 194. | 79.1% | Dallas, TX / 2,379,214 |
| 195. | 78.9% | Ellis, TX / 149,712 |
| 196. | 78.9% | Polk, TX / 45,618 |
| 197. | 78.8% | Armstrong, TX / 1,820 |
| 198. | 78.6% | Oldham, TX / 2,048 |
| 198. | 78.6% | Hemphill, TX / 3,863 |
| 200. | 78.4% | Matagorda, TX / 36,653 |
| 201. | 78.3% | Parmer, TX / 10,172 |
| 202. | 78.1% | Burnet, TX / 42,946 |
| 203. | 77.6% | Aransas, TX / 23,391 |
| 204. | 77.2% | Donley, TX / 3,652 |
| 205. | 77.2% | Cottle, TX / 1,600 |
| 206. | 76.6% | Burleson, TX / 17,160 |
| 207. | 76.5% | Bastrop, TX / 74,023 |
| 208. | 76.3% | Knox, TX / 3,713 |
| 209. | 75.8% | Gregg, TX / 121,451 |
| 210. | 75.8% | Cherokee, TX / 50,690 |
| 211. | 75.5% | Frio, TX / 17,265 |
| 212. | 74.6% | Newton, TX / 14,372 |
| 213. | 74.4% | Culberson, TX / 2,386 |
| 214. | 74.3% | Jackson, TX / 14,075 |
| 215. | 73.6% | Grayson, TX / 120,641 |
| 216. | 73.6% | Dawson, TX / 13,761 |
| 217. | 73.5% | Floyd, TX / 6,439 |
| 218. | 73.3% | Crosby, TX / 6,100 |
| 219. | 73.2% | Austin, TX / 28,372 |
| 220. | 72.7% | Kendall, TX / 33,745 |
| 221. | 72.6% | Dimmit, TX / 10,054 |
| 222. | 72.5% | Rains, TX / 10,976 |
| 223. | 72.4% | Guadalupe, TX / 131,945 |
| 224. | 72.3% | Jasper, TX / 35,703 |
| 225. | 71.4% | Lee, TX / 16,591 |
| 226. | 71.0% | Winkler, TX / 7,137 |
| 227. | 70.1% | Gillespie, TX / 24,777 |
| 228. | 69.7% | Wood, TX / 41,927 |
| 229. | 66.7% | Jones, TX / 20,137 |
| 230. | 66.1% | Waller, TX / 42,894 |
| 231. | 64.6% | Harrison, TX / 65,958 |
| 232. | 64.3% | San Jacinto, TX / 26,482 |
| 233. | 63.9% | Crockett, TX / 3,669 |
| 234. | 63.3% | Hardeman, TX / 4,124 |
| 235. | 62.6% | Kerr, TX / 49,469 |
| 236. | 60.0% | Throckmorton, TX / 1,626 |
| 237. | 58.7% | La Salle, TX / 6,850 |
| 238. | 57.1% | Briscoe, TX / 1,674 |
| 239. | 55.5% | Gaines, TX / 17,572 |
| 240. | 54.6% | Reagan, TX / 3,384 |
| 241. | 54.4% | Hale, TX / 36,153 |
| 242. | 54.0% | San Augustine, TX / 8,898 |
| 243. | 53.3% | Callahan, TX / 13,521 |
| 244. | 51.1% | Kimble, TX / 4,577 |
| 245. | 49.2% | Brown, TX / 38,018 |
| 246. | 48.7% | Mclennan, TX / 234,626 |
| 247. | 43.9% | Shackelford, TX / 3,346 |
| 248. | 38.9% | Taylor, TX / 131,425 |
| 249. | 36.7% | Mills, TX / 4,880 |
| 250. | 29.4% | Stonewall, TX / 1,447 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Public College Enrollment Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Public College Enrollment Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.