Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 40.1% | Davidson, TN / 629,113 |
| 2. | 39.5% | Lake, TN / 7,780 |
| 3. | 34.1% | Shelby, TN / 929,437 |
| 4. | 32.9% | Montgomery, TN / 173,138 |
| 5. | 32.1% | Dyer, TN / 38,234 |
| 6. | 32.0% | Haywood, TN / 18,673 |
| 7. | 31.9% | Putnam, TN / 72,172 |
| 8. | 31.8% | Knox, TN / 433,207 |
| 9. | 31.4% | Weakley, TN / 34,802 |
| 10. | 31.0% | Hamilton, TN / 337,023 |
| 11. | 30.3% | Lauderdale, TN / 27,772 |
| 12. | 29.9% | Bradley, TN / 99,229 |
| 13. | 29.9% | Washington, TN / 122,840 |
| 14. | 29.5% | Rutherford, TN / 263,815 |
| 15. | 28.6% | Madison, TN / 97,976 |
| 16. | 28.3% | Coffee, TN / 52,853 |
| 17. | 27.4% | Anderson, TN / 75,039 |
| 18. | 27.2% | Bedford, TN / 45,060 |
| 19. | 26.6% | Maury, TN / 80,965 |
| 20. | 26.0% | Hamblen, TN / 62,528 |
| 21. | 25.8% | Crockett, TN / 14,567 |
| 22. | 25.4% | Obion, TN / 31,721 |
| 23. | 25.2% | Warren, TN / 39,767 |
| 24. | 25.1% | Sumner, TN / 161,206 |
| 25. | 24.5% | Cocke, TN / 35,631 |
| 26. | 24.3% | Campbell, TN / 40,629 |
| 27. | 24.3% | Houston, TN / 8,375 |
| 28. | 24.2% | Greene, TN / 68,755 |
| 29. | 24.2% | Rhea, TN / 31,817 |
| 30. | 24.1% | Gibson, TN / 49,594 |
| 31. | 24.1% | Dickson, TN / 49,704 |
| 32. | 24.0% | Tipton, TN / 61,038 |
| 33. | 23.9% | Marshall, TN / 30,585 |
| 34. | 23.3% | Macon, TN / 22,265 |
| 35. | 23.3% | Mcminn, TN / 52,325 |
| 36. | 23.1% | Carter, TN / 57,531 |
| 37. | 23.0% | Hardeman, TN / 27,193 |
| 38. | 22.9% | Chester, TN / 17,043 |
| 39. | 22.8% | Sullivan, TN / 156,675 |
| 40. | 22.8% | Blount, TN / 123,086 |
| 41. | 22.5% | Mcnairy, TN / 26,001 |
| 41. | 22.5% | Lincoln, TN / 33,295 |
| 43. | 22.5% | Monroe, TN / 44,680 |
| 43. | 22.5% | Sevier, TN / 90,218 |
| 45. | 22.4% | Roane, TN / 54,027 |
| 46. | 22.3% | Lewis, TN / 12,050 |
| 47. | 22.1% | Marion, TN / 28,184 |
| 48. | 21.9% | Giles, TN / 29,439 |
| 49. | 21.6% | Hancock, TN / 6,759 |
| 50. | 21.5% | Robertson, TN / 66,143 |
| 51. | 21.5% | Lawrence, TN / 41,779 |
| 52. | 21.3% | Smith, TN / 19,157 |
| 53. | 21.0% | Sequatchie, TN / 14,173 |
| 54. | 20.7% | Hawkins, TN / 56,725 |
| 55. | 20.6% | Jefferson, TN / 51,541 |
| 56. | 20.3% | Henderson, TN / 27,835 |
| 57. | 20.2% | Humphreys, TN / 18,428 |
| 58. | 20.1% | Dekalb, TN / 18,770 |
| 59. | 20.1% | Loudon, TN / 48,586 |
| 60. | 20.1% | Perry, TN / 7,856 |
| 61. | 20.0% | Franklin, TN / 40,972 |
| 61. | 20.0% | Unicoi, TN / 18,287 |
| 63. | 19.8% | Henry, TN / 32,271 |
| 64. | 19.8% | Scott, TN / 22,196 |
| 65. | 19.7% | Claiborne, TN / 32,025 |
| 66. | 19.6% | Cannon, TN / 13,797 |
| 67. | 19.4% | White, TN / 25,863 |
| 68. | 19.1% | Trousdale, TN / 7,827 |
| 69. | 18.7% | Jackson, TN / 11,526 |
| 70. | 18.6% | Carroll, TN / 28,486 |
| 71. | 18.5% | Wilson, TN / 114,618 |
| 72. | 18.3% | Fentress, TN / 17,945 |
| 73. | 18.3% | Johnson, TN / 18,199 |
| 74. | 17.9% | Pickett, TN / 5,108 |
| 75. | 17.7% | Clay, TN / 7,842 |
| 76. | 17.6% | Cumberland, TN / 56,144 |
| 77. | 17.4% | Cheatham, TN / 39,103 |
| 78. | 17.3% | Williamson, TN / 184,225 |
| 79. | 17.2% | Grundy, TN / 13,751 |
| 80. | 17.1% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,898 |
| 81. | 17.1% | Union, TN / 19,179 |
| 82. | 16.9% | Morgan, TN / 21,882 |
| 83. | 16.8% | Hardin, TN / 25,987 |
| 84. | 16.7% | Overton, TN / 22,040 |
| 85. | 16.6% | Fayette, TN / 38,370 |
| 86. | 16.2% | Hickman, TN / 24,481 |
| 87. | 15.9% | Benton, TN / 16,420 |
| 88. | 15.7% | Decatur, TN / 11,732 |
| 89. | 15.6% | Polk, TN / 16,756 |
| 90. | 15.3% | Stewart, TN / 13,262 |
| 91. | 15.1% | Grainger, TN / 22,613 |
| 92. | 14.9% | Meigs, TN / 11,696 |
| 93. | 13.4% | Wayne, TN / 17,015 |
| 94. | 12.6% | Moore, TN / 6,349 |
| 95. | 12.1% | Van Buren, TN / 5,552 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.