Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 37.1% | Davidson, TN / 621,465 |
| 2. | 35.9% | Lake, TN / 7,404 |
| 3. | 33.2% | Shelby, TN / 918,186 |
| 4. | 31.4% | Montgomery, TN / 153,491 |
| 5. | 31.4% | Putnam, TN / 69,938 |
| 6. | 31.4% | Haywood, TN / 19,155 |
| 7. | 31.2% | Dyer, TN / 37,698 |
| 8. | 30.1% | Knox, TN / 423,655 |
| 9. | 29.9% | Madison, TN / 96,346 |
| 10. | 29.8% | Bradley, TN / 95,184 |
| 11. | 29.7% | Hamilton, TN / 330,941 |
| 12. | 29.6% | Bedford, TN / 44,291 |
| 13. | 28.8% | Rutherford, TN / 240,181 |
| 14. | 28.4% | Weakley, TN / 33,389 |
| 15. | 27.7% | Lauderdale, TN / 26,568 |
| 16. | 27.7% | Washington, TN / 116,750 |
| 17. | 27.4% | Scott, TN / 21,852 |
| 18. | 27.3% | Hamblen, TN / 61,698 |
| 19. | 27.2% | Obion, TN / 31,610 |
| 20. | 26.9% | Gibson, TN / 48,586 |
| 21. | 25.7% | Anderson, TN / 73,382 |
| 22. | 25.3% | Coffee, TN / 51,694 |
| 23. | 25.1% | Crockett, TN / 14,408 |
| 24. | 25.0% | Maury, TN / 80,190 |
| 25. | 24.6% | Hancock, TN / 6,633 |
| 26. | 23.8% | Warren, TN / 39,915 |
| 27. | 23.7% | Carter, TN / 58,955 |
| 28. | 23.6% | Mcminn, TN / 52,055 |
| 28. | 23.6% | Sumner, TN / 151,874 |
| 30. | 23.4% | Marshall, TN / 29,297 |
| 31. | 23.3% | Greene, TN / 65,698 |
| 32. | 23.2% | Dickson, TN / 47,140 |
| 33. | 23.1% | Tipton, TN / 57,543 |
| 34. | 22.9% | Sullivan, TN / 153,314 |
| 35. | 22.7% | Chester, TN / 16,106 |
| 36. | 22.3% | Campbell, TN / 40,646 |
| 37. | 22.3% | Cocke, TN / 35,406 |
| 38. | 22.2% | Robertson, TN / 63,521 |
| 39. | 22.1% | Cannon, TN / 13,505 |
| 40. | 22.0% | Rhea, TN / 30,633 |
| 41. | 21.9% | Unicoi, TN / 17,686 |
| 42. | 21.7% | Marion, TN / 27,960 |
| 43. | 21.7% | Hardeman, TN / 27,759 |
| 44. | 21.5% | Sevier, TN / 83,448 |
| 45. | 21.3% | Macon, TN / 21,708 |
| 46. | 21.1% | Lewis, TN / 11,466 |
| 47. | 20.8% | Henderson, TN / 26,687 |
| 48. | 20.8% | Blount, TN / 119,489 |
| 49. | 20.7% | Giles, TN / 29,075 |
| 50. | 20.6% | Hawkins, TN / 56,957 |
| 51. | 20.3% | Jefferson, TN / 50,116 |
| 52. | 20.3% | Monroe, TN / 44,602 |
| 53. | 20.2% | Lincoln, TN / 32,764 |
| 54. | 20.2% | Jackson, TN / 10,896 |
| 55. | 20.0% | Houston, TN / 8,041 |
| 56. | 19.9% | Hickman, TN / 23,670 |
| 57. | 19.9% | White, TN / 24,897 |
| 58. | 19.8% | Pickett, TN / 4,803 |
| 59. | 19.8% | Roane, TN / 53,186 |
| 60. | 19.8% | Polk, TN / 15,735 |
| 61. | 19.7% | Franklin, TN / 41,021 |
| 62. | 19.6% | Decatur, TN / 11,472 |
| 63. | 19.6% | Lawrence, TN / 40,899 |
| 64. | 19.5% | Humphreys, TN / 18,151 |
| 65. | 19.5% | Johnson, TN / 18,019 |
| 66. | 19.5% | Fentress, TN / 17,412 |
| 67. | 19.4% | Carroll, TN / 28,686 |
| 68. | 19.3% | Loudon, TN / 45,176 |
| 69. | 19.0% | Meigs, TN / 11,747 |
| 70. | 18.8% | Cheatham, TN / 39,042 |
| 71. | 18.5% | Henry, TN / 31,567 |
| 72. | 18.4% | Hardin, TN / 26,093 |
| 72. | 18.4% | Dekalb, TN / 18,624 |
| 74. | 18.3% | Claiborne, TN / 31,081 |
| 75. | 18.3% | Overton, TN / 20,816 |
| 76. | 18.2% | Clay, TN / 7,937 |
| 77. | 17.4% | Union, TN / 18,927 |
| 78. | 17.3% | Cumberland, TN / 52,852 |
| 79. | 17.3% | Wilson, TN / 106,472 |
| 80. | 17.1% | Smith, TN / 18,863 |
| 81. | 17.1% | Fayette, TN / 36,820 |
| 82. | 16.8% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,941 |
| 83. | 16.3% | Grundy, TN / 14,262 |
| 84. | 16.3% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,436 |
| 85. | 16.3% | Trousdale, TN / 7,682 |
| 86. | 16.0% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,377 |
| 87. | 15.9% | Williamson, TN / 165,526 |
| 88. | 15.9% | Morgan, TN / 19,294 |
| 89. | 15.7% | Van Buren, TN / 5,423 |
| 90. | 15.6% | Stewart, TN / 13,078 |
| 91. | 15.1% | Wayne, TN / 16,592 |
| 92. | 15.1% | Benton, TN / 16,130 |
| 93. | 14.5% | Perry, TN / 7,694 |
| 94. | 13.9% | Grainger, TN / 22,549 |
| 95. | 12.4% | Moore, TN / 6,044 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Renter Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.