A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 10-20% of Owner Income ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 39.3% | Marshall, TN / 29,902 |
2. | 38.5% | Meigs, TN / 11,581 |
3. | 37.1% | White, TN / 25,460 |
4. | 37.0% | Tipton, TN / 59,689 |
5. | 36.9% | Giles, TN / 29,558 |
6. | 36.9% | Perry, TN / 7,778 |
7. | 36.5% | Lawrence, TN / 41,319 |
8. | 36.0% | Van Buren, TN / 5,503 |
9. | 35.1% | Carter, TN / 57,710 |
10. | 34.8% | Benton, TN / 16,456 |
11. | 34.7% | Grundy, TN / 13,910 |
12. | 34.5% | Jackson, TN / 11,491 |
13. | 34.2% | Hardeman, TN / 27,655 |
14. | 34.0% | Moore, TN / 6,266 |
15. | 33.9% | Grainger, TN / 22,419 |
16. | 33.4% | Weakley, TN / 34,557 |
17. | 33.4% | Marion, TN / 28,123 |
18. | 33.3% | Coffee, TN / 52,344 |
19. | 33.2% | Carroll, TN / 28,644 |
20. | 33.2% | Shelby, TN / 922,696 |
21. | 32.8% | Jefferson, TN / 50,600 |
22. | 32.6% | Putnam, TN / 70,570 |
23. | 32.5% | Hawkins, TN / 56,562 |
24. | 32.4% | Franklin, TN / 41,054 |
25. | 32.3% | Davidson, TN / 612,884 |
26. | 32.2% | Scott, TN / 22,171 |
27. | 32.1% | Obion, TN / 31,905 |
28. | 32.1% | Union, TN / 19,088 |
29. | 32.0% | Lake, TN / 7,827 |
30. | 32.0% | Johnson, TN / 18,190 |
31. | 31.9% | Lauderdale, TN / 27,745 |
32. | 31.9% | Crockett, TN / 14,524 |
33. | 31.9% | Cannon, TN / 13,631 |
34. | 31.7% | Morgan, TN / 21,664 |
35. | 31.7% | Haywood, TN / 19,010 |
36. | 31.6% | Blount, TN / 121,140 |
37. | 31.3% | Houston, TN / 8,286 |
38. | 31.2% | Lincoln, TN / 32,885 |
39. | 31.2% | Hamilton, TN / 328,960 |
40. | 31.0% | Greene, TN / 68,172 |
41. | 31.0% | Gibson, TN / 49,015 |
42. | 30.9% | Chester, TN / 16,793 |
43. | 30.9% | Dyer, TN / 38,174 |
44. | 30.8% | Monroe, TN / 44,015 |
45. | 30.8% | Hardin, TN / 25,995 |
46. | 30.7% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,760 |
47. | 30.6% | Overton, TN / 21,777 |
48. | 30.4% | Cumberland, TN / 54,977 |
49. | 30.3% | Roane, TN / 54,156 |
50. | 30.3% | Knox, TN / 423,748 |
51. | 30.2% | Mcminn, TN / 52,075 |
52. | 30.2% | Humphreys, TN / 18,416 |
53. | 30.1% | Smith, TN / 19,035 |
53. | 30.1% | Warren, TN / 39,539 |
55. | 30.1% | Hamblen, TN / 61,857 |
56. | 29.9% | Sumner, TN / 155,592 |
56. | 29.9% | Madison, TN / 97,378 |
58. | 29.7% | Cheatham, TN / 38,809 |
59. | 29.7% | Wayne, TN / 17,016 |
60. | 29.7% | Clay, TN / 7,888 |
61. | 29.5% | Sullivan, TN / 155,815 |
62. | 29.3% | Polk, TN / 16,690 |
63. | 29.3% | Campbell, TN / 40,623 |
64. | 29.2% | Washington, TN / 119,768 |
65. | 29.0% | Dickson, TN / 48,712 |
66. | 28.9% | Cocke, TN / 35,473 |
67. | 28.8% | Bradley, TN / 97,192 |
68. | 28.8% | Henry, TN / 32,042 |
69. | 28.7% | Anderson, TN / 74,257 |
70. | 28.6% | Claiborne, TN / 31,901 |
71. | 28.6% | Williamson, TN / 174,260 |
72. | 28.6% | Maury, TN / 79,029 |
73. | 28.4% | Sevier, TN / 87,507 |
74. | 28.3% | Bedford, TN / 44,172 |
75. | 28.0% | Montgomery, TN / 163,603 |
76. | 27.8% | Rhea, TN / 31,215 |
77. | 27.8% | Decatur, TN / 11,716 |
78. | 27.7% | Fayette, TN / 37,458 |
79. | 27.6% | Macon, TN / 21,934 |
80. | 27.4% | Robertson, TN / 64,347 |
81. | 27.2% | Rutherford, TN / 250,517 |
82. | 27.0% | Dekalb, TN / 18,569 |
83. | 26.8% | Wilson, TN / 109,563 |
84. | 26.8% | Lewis, TN / 12,003 |
85. | 26.5% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,814 |
86. | 26.3% | Fentress, TN / 17,777 |
87. | 26.1% | Stewart, TN / 13,133 |
88. | 25.9% | Henderson, TN / 27,518 |
89. | 25.7% | Loudon, TN / 47,102 |
90. | 25.3% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,946 |
91. | 24.2% | Hickman, TN / 24,506 |
92. | 23.3% | Pickett, TN / 5,072 |
93. | 22.9% | Trousdale, TN / 7,751 |
94. | 21.6% | Unicoi, TN / 18,257 |
95. | 20.1% | Hancock, TN / 6,782 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 10-20% of Owner Income' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 10-20% of Owner Income' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.