Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 77.5% | Williamson, TN / 184,225 |
| 2. | 75.4% | Fayette, TN / 38,370 |
| 3. | 75.4% | Cheatham, TN / 39,103 |
| 4. | 74.7% | Wilson, TN / 114,618 |
| 5. | 71.0% | Robertson, TN / 66,143 |
| 6. | 70.6% | Loudon, TN / 48,586 |
| 7. | 69.9% | Wayne, TN / 17,015 |
| 8. | 69.8% | Overton, TN / 22,040 |
| 9. | 69.4% | Moore, TN / 6,349 |
| 10. | 69.4% | Morgan, TN / 21,882 |
| 11. | 69.3% | Hickman, TN / 24,481 |
| 12. | 68.8% | Cannon, TN / 13,797 |
| 13. | 68.2% | Tipton, TN / 61,038 |
| 14. | 67.9% | Grainger, TN / 22,613 |
| 15. | 67.5% | Sullivan, TN / 156,675 |
| 16. | 67.3% | Meigs, TN / 11,696 |
| 17. | 67.3% | Lawrence, TN / 41,779 |
| 18. | 66.8% | Hawkins, TN / 56,725 |
| 19. | 66.8% | Sumner, TN / 161,206 |
| 20. | 66.7% | Henderson, TN / 27,835 |
| 21. | 66.1% | Greene, TN / 68,755 |
| 22. | 66.1% | Cumberland, TN / 56,144 |
| 23. | 66.1% | Dickson, TN / 49,704 |
| 24. | 66.0% | Sequatchie, TN / 14,173 |
| 25. | 66.0% | Van Buren, TN / 5,552 |
| 26. | 65.8% | Claiborne, TN / 32,025 |
| 27. | 65.7% | Grundy, TN / 13,751 |
| 28. | 65.6% | Lincoln, TN / 33,295 |
| 29. | 65.6% | Scott, TN / 22,196 |
| 30. | 65.6% | White, TN / 25,863 |
| 31. | 65.5% | Blount, TN / 123,086 |
| 32. | 65.5% | Franklin, TN / 40,972 |
| 33. | 65.5% | Trousdale, TN / 7,827 |
| 34. | 65.4% | Polk, TN / 16,756 |
| 35. | 65.4% | Marshall, TN / 30,585 |
| 36. | 65.3% | Mcminn, TN / 52,325 |
| 37. | 65.2% | Roane, TN / 54,027 |
| 38. | 65.2% | Union, TN / 19,179 |
| 39. | 65.2% | Unicoi, TN / 18,287 |
| 40. | 64.6% | Fentress, TN / 17,945 |
| 41. | 64.5% | Humphreys, TN / 18,428 |
| 42. | 64.5% | Lewis, TN / 12,050 |
| 43. | 64.3% | Hamblen, TN / 62,528 |
| 44. | 64.2% | Marion, TN / 28,184 |
| 45. | 64.1% | Maury, TN / 80,965 |
| 46. | 63.9% | Smith, TN / 19,157 |
| 47. | 63.7% | Gibson, TN / 49,594 |
| 48. | 63.6% | Carroll, TN / 28,486 |
| 48. | 63.6% | Chester, TN / 17,043 |
| 50. | 63.4% | Carter, TN / 57,531 |
| 51. | 63.2% | Rutherford, TN / 263,815 |
| 52. | 63.1% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,898 |
| 53. | 62.8% | Jefferson, TN / 51,541 |
| 54. | 62.7% | Johnson, TN / 18,199 |
| 55. | 62.5% | Stewart, TN / 13,262 |
| 56. | 62.4% | Benton, TN / 16,420 |
| 57. | 62.3% | Giles, TN / 29,439 |
| 58. | 62.2% | Macon, TN / 22,265 |
| 59. | 61.7% | Coffee, TN / 52,853 |
| 60. | 61.7% | Monroe, TN / 44,680 |
| 61. | 61.6% | Anderson, TN / 75,039 |
| 62. | 61.5% | Crockett, TN / 14,567 |
| 63. | 61.0% | Knox, TN / 433,207 |
| 64. | 61.0% | Warren, TN / 39,767 |
| 65. | 61.0% | Bedford, TN / 45,060 |
| 66. | 60.4% | Mcnairy, TN / 26,001 |
| 66. | 60.4% | Cocke, TN / 35,631 |
| 68. | 60.3% | Bradley, TN / 99,229 |
| 69. | 60.0% | Houston, TN / 8,375 |
| 70. | 59.9% | Obion, TN / 31,721 |
| 71. | 59.9% | Washington, TN / 122,840 |
| 72. | 59.4% | Decatur, TN / 11,732 |
| 73. | 59.3% | Clay, TN / 7,842 |
| 74. | 59.1% | Jackson, TN / 11,526 |
| 75. | 58.7% | Rhea, TN / 31,817 |
| 76. | 58.4% | Hancock, TN / 6,759 |
| 77. | 58.4% | Weakley, TN / 34,802 |
| 78. | 58.3% | Henry, TN / 32,271 |
| 79. | 58.3% | Hardeman, TN / 27,193 |
| 80. | 58.1% | Hamilton, TN / 337,023 |
| 81. | 57.4% | Madison, TN / 97,976 |
| 82. | 57.3% | Dyer, TN / 38,234 |
| 83. | 57.0% | Lauderdale, TN / 27,772 |
| 84. | 57.0% | Putnam, TN / 72,172 |
| 85. | 56.4% | Hardin, TN / 25,987 |
| 86. | 56.3% | Montgomery, TN / 173,138 |
| 87. | 56.1% | Campbell, TN / 40,629 |
| 88. | 55.5% | Dekalb, TN / 18,770 |
| 89. | 53.9% | Pickett, TN / 5,108 |
| 90. | 53.5% | Haywood, TN / 18,673 |
| 91. | 51.6% | Shelby, TN / 929,437 |
| 92. | 51.3% | Perry, TN / 7,856 |
| 93. | 50.4% | Lake, TN / 7,780 |
| 94. | 49.9% | Davidson, TN / 629,113 |
| 95. | 44.7% | Sevier, TN / 90,218 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.