Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 78.9% | Williamson, TN / 165,526 |
| 2. | 77.1% | Wilson, TN / 106,472 |
| 3. | 76.4% | Morgan, TN / 19,294 |
| 4. | 74.0% | Cheatham, TN / 39,042 |
| 5. | 72.8% | Loudon, TN / 45,176 |
| 5. | 72.8% | Fayette, TN / 36,820 |
| 7. | 71.3% | Overton, TN / 20,816 |
| 8. | 70.8% | Robertson, TN / 63,521 |
| 9. | 70.0% | Sumner, TN / 151,874 |
| 10. | 69.8% | Tipton, TN / 57,543 |
| 11. | 69.6% | Lincoln, TN / 32,764 |
| 12. | 69.3% | Trousdale, TN / 7,682 |
| 13. | 69.2% | Cannon, TN / 13,505 |
| 14. | 69.1% | Dickson, TN / 47,140 |
| 15. | 68.8% | Lawrence, TN / 40,899 |
| 16. | 68.5% | Blount, TN / 119,489 |
| 17. | 68.5% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,436 |
| 18. | 68.5% | Sullivan, TN / 153,314 |
| 19. | 68.4% | Grainger, TN / 22,549 |
| 20. | 68.3% | Cumberland, TN / 52,852 |
| 21. | 68.1% | Hickman, TN / 23,670 |
| 22. | 67.9% | Roane, TN / 53,186 |
| 23. | 67.8% | Moore, TN / 6,044 |
| 24. | 67.5% | Union, TN / 18,927 |
| 25. | 67.2% | White, TN / 24,897 |
| 26. | 67.1% | Chester, TN / 16,106 |
| 27. | 67.1% | Marshall, TN / 29,297 |
| 28. | 67.0% | Mcminn, TN / 52,055 |
| 29. | 66.8% | Wayne, TN / 16,592 |
| 30. | 66.8% | Maury, TN / 80,190 |
| 31. | 66.8% | Marion, TN / 27,960 |
| 32. | 66.7% | Henderson, TN / 26,687 |
| 33. | 66.6% | Claiborne, TN / 31,081 |
| 34. | 66.5% | Hawkins, TN / 56,957 |
| 35. | 66.2% | Grundy, TN / 14,262 |
| 36. | 65.9% | Franklin, TN / 41,021 |
| 37. | 65.8% | Jefferson, TN / 50,116 |
| 38. | 65.8% | Johnson, TN / 18,019 |
| 39. | 65.8% | Greene, TN / 65,698 |
| 40. | 65.7% | Smith, TN / 18,863 |
| 41. | 65.5% | Carroll, TN / 28,686 |
| 42. | 65.5% | Hamblen, TN / 61,698 |
| 43. | 65.4% | Humphreys, TN / 18,151 |
| 44. | 65.4% | Coffee, TN / 51,694 |
| 45. | 65.2% | Monroe, TN / 44,602 |
| 46. | 65.2% | Benton, TN / 16,130 |
| 47. | 65.0% | Macon, TN / 21,708 |
| 48. | 64.7% | Anderson, TN / 73,382 |
| 49. | 64.6% | Lewis, TN / 11,466 |
| 50. | 64.4% | Rutherford, TN / 240,181 |
| 51. | 64.4% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,377 |
| 52. | 64.1% | Giles, TN / 29,075 |
| 53. | 64.0% | Gibson, TN / 48,586 |
| 54. | 63.6% | Fentress, TN / 17,412 |
| 55. | 63.4% | Van Buren, TN / 5,423 |
| 56. | 63.2% | Rhea, TN / 30,633 |
| 57. | 63.2% | Cocke, TN / 35,406 |
| 58. | 63.0% | Carter, TN / 58,955 |
| 59. | 62.9% | Clay, TN / 7,937 |
| 60. | 62.9% | Stewart, TN / 13,078 |
| 61. | 62.9% | Unicoi, TN / 17,686 |
| 62. | 62.8% | Scott, TN / 21,852 |
| 63. | 62.8% | Meigs, TN / 11,747 |
| 64. | 62.6% | Henry, TN / 31,567 |
| 65. | 62.1% | Bradley, TN / 95,184 |
| 66. | 62.0% | Hardeman, TN / 27,759 |
| 67. | 62.0% | Polk, TN / 15,735 |
| 67. | 62.0% | Warren, TN / 39,915 |
| 69. | 61.8% | Knox, TN / 423,655 |
| 70. | 61.6% | Jackson, TN / 10,896 |
| 71. | 61.0% | Bedford, TN / 44,291 |
| 72. | 60.8% | Obion, TN / 31,610 |
| 73. | 60.7% | Washington, TN / 116,750 |
| 74. | 60.6% | Crockett, TN / 14,408 |
| 75. | 60.1% | Hamilton, TN / 330,941 |
| 76. | 60.1% | Madison, TN / 96,346 |
| 77. | 59.9% | Campbell, TN / 40,646 |
| 78. | 59.8% | Hardin, TN / 26,093 |
| 79. | 59.6% | Weakley, TN / 33,389 |
| 80. | 59.6% | Houston, TN / 8,041 |
| 81. | 58.2% | Montgomery, TN / 153,491 |
| 82. | 58.0% | Haywood, TN / 19,155 |
| 83. | 57.6% | Hancock, TN / 6,633 |
| 84. | 57.4% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,941 |
| 85. | 57.3% | Dyer, TN / 37,698 |
| 86. | 57.0% | Putnam, TN / 69,938 |
| 87. | 56.3% | Dekalb, TN / 18,624 |
| 88. | 54.9% | Lauderdale, TN / 26,568 |
| 89. | 54.0% | Decatur, TN / 11,472 |
| 90. | 54.0% | Perry, TN / 7,694 |
| 91. | 53.5% | Davidson, TN / 621,465 |
| 92. | 53.5% | Shelby, TN / 918,186 |
| 93. | 51.4% | Sevier, TN / 83,448 |
| 94. | 51.2% | Pickett, TN / 4,803 |
| 95. | 50.7% | Lake, TN / 7,404 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.