Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 94.9% | Williamson, TN / 174,260 |
| 2. | 93.8% | Wilson, TN / 109,563 |
| 3. | 92.9% | Robertson, TN / 64,347 |
| 4. | 92.9% | Tipton, TN / 59,689 |
| 5. | 92.9% | Sumner, TN / 155,592 |
| 6. | 92.8% | Rutherford, TN / 250,517 |
| 7. | 92.5% | Loudon, TN / 47,102 |
| 8. | 92.4% | Knox, TN / 423,748 |
| 9. | 92.3% | Dickson, TN / 48,712 |
| 10. | 92.1% | Cheatham, TN / 38,809 |
| 11. | 91.6% | Maury, TN / 79,029 |
| 12. | 91.6% | Bradley, TN / 97,192 |
| 13. | 91.5% | Hamblen, TN / 61,857 |
| 14. | 90.8% | Morgan, TN / 21,664 |
| 15. | 90.8% | Sullivan, TN / 155,815 |
| 16. | 90.6% | Coffee, TN / 52,344 |
| 16. | 90.6% | Marshall, TN / 29,902 |
| 18. | 90.2% | Davidson, TN / 612,884 |
| 19. | 90.1% | Dyer, TN / 38,174 |
| 19. | 90.1% | Fayette, TN / 37,458 |
| 21. | 89.8% | Hamilton, TN / 328,960 |
| 22. | 89.7% | Mcminn, TN / 52,075 |
| 23. | 89.7% | Anderson, TN / 74,257 |
| 24. | 89.5% | Montgomery, TN / 163,603 |
| 25. | 89.4% | Haywood, TN / 19,010 |
| 26. | 89.3% | Gibson, TN / 49,015 |
| 27. | 89.2% | Bedford, TN / 44,172 |
| 28. | 89.2% | Lincoln, TN / 32,885 |
| 29. | 89.1% | Cannon, TN / 13,631 |
| 30. | 89.1% | Hickman, TN / 24,506 |
| 31. | 89.0% | Weakley, TN / 34,557 |
| 32. | 89.0% | Greene, TN / 68,172 |
| 33. | 88.8% | Madison, TN / 97,378 |
| 34. | 88.8% | Roane, TN / 54,156 |
| 35. | 88.8% | Hawkins, TN / 56,562 |
| 36. | 88.8% | Blount, TN / 121,140 |
| 37. | 88.7% | Putnam, TN / 70,570 |
| 38. | 88.2% | Washington, TN / 119,768 |
| 39. | 88.0% | Scott, TN / 22,171 |
| 40. | 87.7% | Lake, TN / 7,827 |
| 41. | 87.6% | Lawrence, TN / 41,319 |
| 42. | 87.2% | Marion, TN / 28,123 |
| 43. | 86.9% | Overton, TN / 21,777 |
| 44. | 86.8% | Crockett, TN / 14,524 |
| 45. | 86.8% | Carter, TN / 57,710 |
| 46. | 86.8% | White, TN / 25,460 |
| 47. | 86.7% | Chester, TN / 16,793 |
| 48. | 86.5% | Unicoi, TN / 18,257 |
| 49. | 86.3% | Monroe, TN / 44,015 |
| 50. | 86.1% | Obion, TN / 31,905 |
| 51. | 85.9% | Shelby, TN / 922,696 |
| 52. | 85.8% | Henderson, TN / 27,518 |
| 53. | 85.4% | Cocke, TN / 35,473 |
| 54. | 85.1% | Jefferson, TN / 50,600 |
| 54. | 85.1% | Humphreys, TN / 18,416 |
| 56. | 85.1% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,760 |
| 57. | 84.9% | Franklin, TN / 41,054 |
| 58. | 84.8% | Claiborne, TN / 31,901 |
| 58. | 84.8% | Warren, TN / 39,539 |
| 60. | 84.7% | Giles, TN / 29,558 |
| 61. | 84.6% | Cumberland, TN / 54,977 |
| 62. | 84.4% | Lewis, TN / 12,003 |
| 63. | 84.4% | Trousdale, TN / 7,751 |
| 64. | 84.2% | Macon, TN / 21,934 |
| 65. | 84.1% | Hancock, TN / 6,782 |
| 66. | 84.0% | Carroll, TN / 28,644 |
| 67. | 83.7% | Rhea, TN / 31,215 |
| 68. | 83.7% | Fentress, TN / 17,777 |
| 69. | 83.6% | Moore, TN / 6,266 |
| 70. | 83.3% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,814 |
| 70. | 83.3% | Lauderdale, TN / 27,745 |
| 72. | 83.1% | Johnson, TN / 18,190 |
| 73. | 83.0% | Union, TN / 19,088 |
| 74. | 82.5% | Hardeman, TN / 27,655 |
| 75. | 81.9% | Meigs, TN / 11,581 |
| 76. | 81.8% | Grundy, TN / 13,910 |
| 77. | 81.5% | Houston, TN / 8,286 |
| 78. | 81.1% | Smith, TN / 19,035 |
| 79. | 81.1% | Wayne, TN / 17,016 |
| 80. | 80.6% | Stewart, TN / 13,133 |
| 81. | 80.6% | Jackson, TN / 11,491 |
| 82. | 80.3% | Campbell, TN / 40,623 |
| 83. | 80.1% | Grainger, TN / 22,419 |
| 84. | 79.9% | Polk, TN / 16,690 |
| 85. | 79.7% | Henry, TN / 32,042 |
| 86. | 79.4% | Van Buren, TN / 5,503 |
| 87. | 78.9% | Clay, TN / 7,888 |
| 88. | 78.3% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,946 |
| 89. | 77.7% | Benton, TN / 16,456 |
| 90. | 77.2% | Dekalb, TN / 18,569 |
| 91. | 75.9% | Hardin, TN / 25,995 |
| 92. | 72.8% | Decatur, TN / 11,716 |
| 93. | 72.5% | Perry, TN / 7,778 |
| 94. | 71.2% | Sevier, TN / 87,507 |
| 95. | 71.1% | Pickett, TN / 5,072 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.