Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 94.8% | Williamson, TN / 165,526 |
| 2. | 94.3% | Wilson, TN / 106,472 |
| 3. | 93.6% | Sumner, TN / 151,874 |
| 4. | 93.2% | Rutherford, TN / 240,181 |
| 5. | 93.0% | Robertson, TN / 63,521 |
| 6. | 93.0% | Tipton, TN / 57,543 |
| 7. | 92.8% | Hamblen, TN / 61,698 |
| 7. | 92.8% | Cheatham, TN / 39,042 |
| 9. | 92.3% | Morgan, TN / 19,294 |
| 10. | 92.2% | Dickson, TN / 47,140 |
| 11. | 92.0% | Loudon, TN / 45,176 |
| 12. | 91.9% | Knox, TN / 423,655 |
| 13. | 91.9% | Bradley, TN / 95,184 |
| 14. | 91.7% | Maury, TN / 80,190 |
| 15. | 91.3% | Sullivan, TN / 153,314 |
| 16. | 91.3% | Cannon, TN / 13,505 |
| 17. | 90.9% | Gibson, TN / 48,586 |
| 18. | 90.6% | Mcminn, TN / 52,055 |
| 18. | 90.6% | Davidson, TN / 621,465 |
| 20. | 90.6% | Bedford, TN / 44,291 |
| 21. | 90.6% | Coffee, TN / 51,694 |
| 22. | 90.5% | Marshall, TN / 29,297 |
| 23. | 90.3% | Anderson, TN / 73,382 |
| 24. | 90.2% | Scott, TN / 21,852 |
| 25. | 89.9% | Madison, TN / 96,346 |
| 26. | 89.9% | Lincoln, TN / 32,764 |
| 27. | 89.8% | Fayette, TN / 36,820 |
| 28. | 89.8% | Chester, TN / 16,106 |
| 29. | 89.8% | Hamilton, TN / 330,941 |
| 30. | 89.7% | Montgomery, TN / 153,491 |
| 31. | 89.7% | Overton, TN / 20,816 |
| 32. | 89.4% | Haywood, TN / 19,155 |
| 33. | 89.3% | Blount, TN / 119,489 |
| 34. | 89.0% | Greene, TN / 65,698 |
| 35. | 88.5% | Dyer, TN / 37,698 |
| 36. | 88.5% | Marion, TN / 27,960 |
| 37. | 88.4% | Putnam, TN / 69,938 |
| 38. | 88.4% | Washington, TN / 116,750 |
| 39. | 88.3% | Lawrence, TN / 40,899 |
| 40. | 88.1% | Obion, TN / 31,610 |
| 41. | 88.1% | Weakley, TN / 33,389 |
| 42. | 88.0% | Hickman, TN / 23,670 |
| 43. | 87.7% | Roane, TN / 53,186 |
| 44. | 87.5% | Henderson, TN / 26,687 |
| 45. | 87.2% | Hawkins, TN / 56,957 |
| 46. | 87.0% | White, TN / 24,897 |
| 47. | 86.7% | Lake, TN / 7,404 |
| 48. | 86.7% | Carter, TN / 58,955 |
| 49. | 86.6% | Shelby, TN / 918,186 |
| 50. | 86.3% | Macon, TN / 21,708 |
| 51. | 86.1% | Jefferson, TN / 50,116 |
| 52. | 85.8% | Warren, TN / 39,915 |
| 53. | 85.7% | Crockett, TN / 14,408 |
| 54. | 85.6% | Lewis, TN / 11,466 |
| 55. | 85.6% | Cumberland, TN / 52,852 |
| 56. | 85.6% | Trousdale, TN / 7,682 |
| 57. | 85.5% | Franklin, TN / 41,021 |
| 58. | 85.4% | Monroe, TN / 44,602 |
| 59. | 85.4% | Cocke, TN / 35,406 |
| 60. | 85.3% | Rhea, TN / 30,633 |
| 61. | 85.2% | Johnson, TN / 18,019 |
| 62. | 84.9% | Humphreys, TN / 18,151 |
| 62. | 84.9% | Claiborne, TN / 31,081 |
| 64. | 84.9% | Union, TN / 18,927 |
| 65. | 84.8% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,436 |
| 66. | 84.8% | Carroll, TN / 28,686 |
| 67. | 84.8% | Unicoi, TN / 17,686 |
| 67. | 84.8% | Giles, TN / 29,075 |
| 69. | 83.7% | Hardeman, TN / 27,759 |
| 70. | 83.1% | Fentress, TN / 17,412 |
| 71. | 82.8% | Smith, TN / 18,863 |
| 72. | 82.6% | Lauderdale, TN / 26,568 |
| 73. | 82.5% | Grundy, TN / 14,262 |
| 74. | 82.3% | Grainger, TN / 22,549 |
| 75. | 82.2% | Hancock, TN / 6,633 |
| 76. | 82.2% | Campbell, TN / 40,646 |
| 77. | 81.9% | Wayne, TN / 16,592 |
| 78. | 81.8% | Jackson, TN / 10,896 |
| 79. | 81.8% | Polk, TN / 15,735 |
| 80. | 81.7% | Meigs, TN / 11,747 |
| 81. | 81.1% | Clay, TN / 7,937 |
| 82. | 81.0% | Henry, TN / 31,567 |
| 83. | 80.5% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,377 |
| 84. | 80.2% | Benton, TN / 16,130 |
| 84. | 80.2% | Moore, TN / 6,044 |
| 86. | 79.5% | Houston, TN / 8,041 |
| 87. | 79.1% | Van Buren, TN / 5,423 |
| 88. | 78.5% | Stewart, TN / 13,078 |
| 89. | 78.2% | Hardin, TN / 26,093 |
| 90. | 74.7% | Dekalb, TN / 18,624 |
| 91. | 74.1% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,941 |
| 92. | 73.6% | Decatur, TN / 11,472 |
| 93. | 73.0% | Sevier, TN / 83,448 |
| 94. | 71.1% | Pickett, TN / 4,803 |
| 95. | 68.4% | Perry, TN / 7,694 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.