Local Data Search
A total of 95 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied House with 1 Vehicle ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 47.7% | Lake, TN / 7,827 |
| 2. | 40.7% | Davidson, TN / 612,884 |
| 3. | 39.3% | Shelby, TN / 922,696 |
| 4. | 37.3% | Knox, TN / 423,748 |
| 5. | 34.7% | Lauderdale, TN / 27,745 |
| 6. | 34.6% | Haywood, TN / 19,010 |
| 7. | 34.6% | Madison, TN / 97,378 |
| 8. | 34.4% | Gibson, TN / 49,015 |
| 9. | 34.2% | Weakley, TN / 34,557 |
| 10. | 34.0% | Decatur, TN / 11,716 |
| 11. | 33.7% | Hardin, TN / 25,995 |
| 12. | 33.7% | Henry, TN / 32,042 |
| 13. | 33.5% | Johnson, TN / 18,190 |
| 14. | 33.4% | Putnam, TN / 70,570 |
| 15. | 33.0% | Unicoi, TN / 18,257 |
| 16. | 32.8% | Washington, TN / 119,768 |
| 17. | 32.6% | Hancock, TN / 6,782 |
| 18. | 32.5% | Hamblen, TN / 61,857 |
| 19. | 32.4% | Campbell, TN / 40,623 |
| 20. | 32.4% | Hamilton, TN / 328,960 |
| 21. | 32.3% | Obion, TN / 31,905 |
| 22. | 32.3% | Fentress, TN / 17,777 |
| 23. | 32.2% | Pickett, TN / 5,072 |
| 24. | 32.2% | Van Buren, TN / 5,503 |
| 25. | 32.1% | Anderson, TN / 74,257 |
| 26. | 32.0% | Carroll, TN / 28,644 |
| 27. | 31.5% | Dyer, TN / 38,174 |
| 28. | 31.4% | Cumberland, TN / 54,977 |
| 29. | 31.3% | Grundy, TN / 13,910 |
| 30. | 31.2% | Hardeman, TN / 27,655 |
| 31. | 31.1% | Jackson, TN / 11,491 |
| 32. | 30.9% | Benton, TN / 16,456 |
| 33. | 30.8% | Sequatchie, TN / 13,814 |
| 34. | 30.5% | Cocke, TN / 35,473 |
| 35. | 30.4% | Sullivan, TN / 155,815 |
| 36. | 30.4% | Warren, TN / 39,539 |
| 37. | 30.2% | Henderson, TN / 27,518 |
| 38. | 30.2% | Bradley, TN / 97,192 |
| 39. | 30.0% | Carter, TN / 57,710 |
| 40. | 30.0% | Union, TN / 19,088 |
| 41. | 29.8% | Perry, TN / 7,778 |
| 42. | 29.8% | Mcnairy, TN / 25,760 |
| 43. | 29.7% | Franklin, TN / 41,054 |
| 44. | 29.7% | Scott, TN / 22,171 |
| 45. | 29.6% | Monroe, TN / 44,015 |
| 46. | 29.5% | Maury, TN / 79,029 |
| 47. | 29.5% | Coffee, TN / 52,344 |
| 48. | 29.3% | Rhea, TN / 31,215 |
| 48. | 29.3% | Claiborne, TN / 31,901 |
| 50. | 29.3% | Stewart, TN / 13,133 |
| 51. | 29.2% | Houston, TN / 8,286 |
| 52. | 29.1% | Meigs, TN / 11,581 |
| 53. | 29.0% | Crockett, TN / 14,524 |
| 54. | 29.0% | Marion, TN / 28,123 |
| 55. | 28.9% | Mcminn, TN / 52,075 |
| 56. | 28.8% | Humphreys, TN / 18,416 |
| 57. | 28.8% | Clay, TN / 7,888 |
| 58. | 28.6% | Giles, TN / 29,558 |
| 59. | 28.5% | Montgomery, TN / 163,603 |
| 60. | 28.5% | Marshall, TN / 29,902 |
| 61. | 28.5% | Roane, TN / 54,156 |
| 62. | 28.3% | Sumner, TN / 155,592 |
| 63. | 28.2% | Overton, TN / 21,777 |
| 64. | 28.2% | Rutherford, TN / 250,517 |
| 65. | 28.1% | Greene, TN / 68,172 |
| 66. | 28.1% | Lincoln, TN / 32,885 |
| 67. | 28.0% | Tipton, TN / 59,689 |
| 68. | 28.0% | Sevier, TN / 87,507 |
| 69. | 27.8% | Bledsoe, TN / 12,946 |
| 70. | 27.8% | Lewis, TN / 12,003 |
| 71. | 27.5% | Dekalb, TN / 18,569 |
| 72. | 27.2% | Trousdale, TN / 7,751 |
| 73. | 27.1% | Macon, TN / 21,934 |
| 74. | 27.0% | White, TN / 25,460 |
| 75. | 27.0% | Hawkins, TN / 56,562 |
| 76. | 26.9% | Polk, TN / 16,690 |
| 76. | 26.9% | Loudon, TN / 47,102 |
| 78. | 26.8% | Chester, TN / 16,793 |
| 79. | 26.4% | Dickson, TN / 48,712 |
| 79. | 26.4% | Grainger, TN / 22,419 |
| 81. | 26.4% | Bedford, TN / 44,172 |
| 82. | 26.4% | Blount, TN / 121,140 |
| 83. | 26.0% | Moore, TN / 6,266 |
| 84. | 25.9% | Jefferson, TN / 50,600 |
| 85. | 25.8% | Lawrence, TN / 41,319 |
| 86. | 25.7% | Cannon, TN / 13,631 |
| 87. | 25.0% | Wayne, TN / 17,016 |
| 88. | 24.5% | Cheatham, TN / 38,809 |
| 89. | 23.4% | Smith, TN / 19,035 |
| 90. | 22.9% | Robertson, TN / 64,347 |
| 91. | 22.7% | Morgan, TN / 21,664 |
| 92. | 22.4% | Wilson, TN / 109,563 |
| 93. | 22.2% | Hickman, TN / 24,506 |
| 94. | 20.6% | Fayette, TN / 37,458 |
| 95. | 20.4% | Williamson, TN / 174,260 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied House with 1 Vehicle' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied House with 1 Vehicle' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.