Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C
Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C is located in northeast Illinois. Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C has 31.95 square miles of land area and 0.18 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C population is 1,663. Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C median household income is $68,405 in 2010-2014. Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C median house value is $151,300 in 2010-2014. On average, Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C Map and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 219 | 222 | 211 | 224 | 229 | 234 | 242 |
English Language Learner Students: | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 16.55 | 14.66 | 15.00 | 14.40 | 10.60 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 |
Elementary: | NA | NA | 16.55 | 14.66 | 14.00 | 14.40 | 9.60 |
Secondary: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.18 | 1.08 | 2.00 | 1.10 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 2.18 | 1.08 | 2.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.10 |
School Administrators: | 0.00 | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 12.75 | 15.28 | 15.27 | 16.25 | 22.83 |
Schools
Gardner Elementary School | Prekindergarten to Grade 8 | 598 North Elm St, Gardner IL 60424 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 96.9% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.2% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 96% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 72% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.2% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 96.3% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 100% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 64% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.6% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.3% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.4% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 68% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.3% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.2% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.8% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 93.9% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 55.5% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.2% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.9% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 61.1% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $2,474,000 | $11,725 | $2,436,000 | $10,875 | $2,456,000 | $10,725 | |||
Federal: | $117,000 | $555 | 4.7% | $206,000 | $920 | 8.5% | $264,000 | $1,153 | 10.7% |
State: | $1,137,000 | $5,389 | 46.0% | $1,011,000 | $4,513 | 41.5% | $1,062,000 | $4,638 | 43.2% |
Local: | $1,220,000 | $5,782 | 49.3% | $1,219,000 | $5,442 | 50.0% | $1,130,000 | $4,934 | 46.0% |
Total Expenditures: | $2,344,000 | $11,109 | $2,004,000 | $8,946 | $2,046,000 | $8,934 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $2,103,000 | $9,967 | $1,692,000 | $7,554 | $1,706,000 | $7,450 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,271,000 | $6,024 | 60.4% | $994,000 | $4,438 | 58.7% | $961,000 | $4,197 | 56.3% |
Student and Staff Support: | $41,000 | $194 | 1.9% | $31,000 | $138 | 1.8% | $62,000 | $271 | 3.6% |
Administration: | $270,000 | $1,280 | 12.8% | $235,000 | $1,049 | 13.9% | $253,000 | $1,105 | 14.8% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $521,000 | $2,469 | 24.8% | $432,000 | $1,929 | 25.5% | $430,000 | $1,878 | 25.2% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $64,000 | $303 | $83,000 | $371 | $2,000 | $9 | |||
Construction: | $62,000 | $294 | $82,000 | $366 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $6,000 | $28 | $9,000 | $40 | $16,000 | $70 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,099,000 | $5,209 | $1,013,000 | $4,522 | $910,000 | $3,974 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $832,000 | $3,943 | 75.7% | $745,000 | $3,326 | 73.5% | $637,000 | $2,782 | 70.0% |
Other Salary: | $267,000 | $1,265 | 24.3% | $268,000 | $1,196 | 26.5% | $273,000 | $1,192 | 30.0% |
Total Benefit: | $483,000 | $2,289 | $254,000 | $1,134 | $407,000 | $1,777 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $365,000 | $1,730 | 75.6% | $188,000 | $839 | 74.0% | $279,000 | $1,218 | 68.6% |
Other Benefit: | $118,000 | $559 | 24.4% | $66,000 | $295 | 26.0% | $128,000 | $559 | 31.4% |
* Gardner Community Consolidated School District 72C was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.