Rank | Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Female Percentage ▼ | School District / Population |
1. | 48.5% | Name N/A / 234 |
2. | 21.9% | St. Thomas Public School District 43 / 651 |
3. | 12.7% | Marmarth Public School District 12 / 244 |
4. | 11.5% | Name N/A / 319 |
5. | 11.2% | Halliday Public School District 19 / 419 |
6. | 9.8% | Oberon Public School District 16 / 245 |
7. | 6.4% | Newburg United Public School District 54 / 504 |
8. | 6.2% | Richardton-Taylor Public School District 34 / 1,490 |
9. | 6.2% | Fort Ransom Public School District 6 / 301 |
10. | 5.9% | Zeeland Public School District 4 / 219 |
11. | 5.7% | Robinson Public School District 14 / 164 |
12. | 5.6% | Medina Public School District 3 / 967 |
13. | 4.6% | Killdeer Public School District 16 / 1,827 |
14. | 4.6% | Sweet Briar Public School District 17 / 112 |
14. | 4.6% | Name N/A / 1,155 |
16. | 4.3% | Name N/A / 526 |
17. | 4.3% | Central Elementary Public School District 32 / 136 |
17. | 4.3% | Lidgerwood Public School District 28 / 1,215 |
19. | 4.1% | Hope Public School District 10 / 548 |
20. | 4.0% | Bowman County Public School District 1 / 2,580 |
21. | 4.0% | North Central Public School District 28 / 427 |
22. | 3.9% | West Hope Public School District 17 / 807 |
23. | 3.6% | Max Public School District 50 / 749 |
24. | 3.6% | Bottineau Public School District 1 / 4,146 |
25. | 3.5% | Grafton Public School District 3 / 4,821 |
26. | 3.4% | Anamoose Public School District 14 / 503 |
27. | 3.2% | Hazen Public School District 3 / 3,015 |
28. | 2.9% | Lewis and Clark Public School District 161 / 2,224 |
29. | 2.7% | Ashley Public School District 9 / 1,103 |
29. | 2.7% | Wolford Public School District 1 / 338 |
31. | 2.4% | Powers Lake Public School District 27 / 643 |
31. | 2.4% | Fordville-Lankin Public School District 5 / 812 |
33. | 2.4% | Roosevelt Public School District 18 / 903 |
34. | 2.4% | Parshall Public School District 3 / 1,633 |
35. | 2.3% | Eureka Public School District 19 / 366 |
36. | 2.3% | Leeds Public School District 6 / 1,045 |
37. | 2.3% | Edgeley Public School District 3 / 1,263 |
38. | 2.3% | Central Valley Public School District 3 / 1,474 |
39. | 2.3% | Munich Public School District 19 / 484 |
40. | 2.2% | Bowbells Public School District 14 / 508 |
41. | 2.1% | LaMoure Public School District 8 / 1,813 |
42. | 2.1% | Billings County Public School District 1 / 912 |
43. | 2.0% | Hebron Public School District 13 / 858 |
44. | 2.0% | Maddock Public School District 9 / 1,106 |
44. | 2.0% | Glen Ullin Public School District 48 / 1,115 |
46. | 1.9% | Hazelton-Moffit-Braddock Public School District 6 / 815 |
47. | 1.9% | Scranton Public School District 33 / 813 |
48. | 1.9% | McKenzie County Public School District 1 / 3,126 |
49. | 1.9% | Richland Public School District 44 / 1,333 |
50. | 1.8% | Turtle Lake-Mercer Public School District 72 / 1,015 |
51. | 1.7% | Name N/A / 1,406 |
52. | 1.6% | Larimore Public School District 44 / 2,710 |
53. | 1.6% | Nesson Public School District 2 / 1,158 |
54. | 1.6% | Hatton Public School District 7 / 1,210 |
55. | 1.5% | Fessenden-Bowdon Public School District 25 / 1,327 |
56. | 1.5% | Thompson Public School District 61 / 2,104 |
57. | 1.4% | Name N/A / 1,735 |
58. | 1.4% | Cavalier Public School District 6 / 2,922 |
59. | 1.4% | Edmore Public School District 2 / 744 |
59. | 1.4% | Underwood Public School District 8 / 1,528 |
61. | 1.4% | Tioga Public School District 15 / 2,095 |
62. | 1.4% | Midway Public School District 128 / 1,499 |
63. | 1.4% | Name N/A / 16,974 |
64. | 1.3% | Dakota Prairie Public School District 1 / 2,642 |
65. | 1.3% | Kensal Public School District 19 / 369 |
66. | 1.3% | Nedrose Public School District 4 / 1,642 |
66. | 1.3% | Adams Public School District 128 / 426 |
68. | 1.3% | Page Public School District 80 / 652 |
69. | 1.2% | New England Public School District 9 / 1,210 |
70. | 1.2% | Harvey Public School District 38 / 2,852 |
70. | 1.2% | Enderlin Area Public School District 24 / 1,966 |
72. | 1.2% | Valley Public School District 12 / 722 |
73. | 0.9% | Rugby Public School District 5 / 3,677 |
74. | 0.9% | Elgin-New Leipzig Public School District 49 / 1,263 |
75. | 0.8% | United Public School District 7 / 2,743 |
76. | 0.8% | Barnes County North Public School District 2 / 2,049 |
76. | 0.8% | Towner-Granville-Upham Public School District 60 / 2,366 |
78. | 0.8% | Center-Stanton Public School District 1 / 1,642 |
79. | 0.8% | Midkota Public School District 7 / 1,199 |
80. | 0.8% | Litchville-Marion Public School District 46 / 1,290 |
81. | 0.7% | Washburn Public School District 4 / 1,638 |
82. | 0.7% | Napoleon Public School District 2 / 1,417 |
83. | 0.7% | Lisbon Public School District 19 / 3,700 |
84. | 0.5% | Maple Valley Public School District 4 / 1,676 |
85. | 0.5% | Mandan Public School District 1 / 21,311 |
86. | 0.5% | May-Port CG Public School District 14 / 3,567 |
87. | 0.4% | New Rockford-Sheyenne Public School District 2 / 2,159 |
88. | 0.4% | Grand Forks Public School District 1 / 52,191 |
89. | 0.4% | Dickinson Public School District 1 / 18,895 |
90. | 0.3% | Devils Lake Public School District 1 / 10,808 |
91. | 0.3% | Mount Pleasant Public School District 4 / 1,772 |
92. | 0.2% | Mohall-Lansford-Sherwood Public School District 1 / 2,125 |
92. | 0.2% | Beulah Public School District 27 / 4,529 |
94. | 0.2% | Hillsboro Public School District 9 / 2,547 |
94. | 0.2% | Bismarck Public School District 1 / 73,152 |
96. | 0.1% | Fargo Public School District 1 / 84,360 |
97. | 0.1% | Wahpeton Public School District 37 / 9,350 |
98. | 0.1% | West Fargo Public School District 6 / 41,985 |
98. | 0.1% | Jamestown Public School District 1 / 17,374 |
100. | 0.1% | Minot Public School District 1 / 43,659 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Female Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations Female Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.