Local Data Search
A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, Waste Management Services Workers Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 17.6% | Wake, NC / 952,513 |
| 2. | 14.5% | Durham, NC / 282,422 |
| 3. | 13.5% | Mecklenburg, NC / 968,500 |
| 4. | 12.7% | Orange, NC / 137,275 |
| 5. | 12.0% | Chatham, NC / 66,050 |
| 6. | 11.8% | New Hanover, NC / 209,586 |
| 7. | 11.0% | Buncombe, NC / 244,599 |
| 8. | 10.9% | Forsyth, NC / 358,130 |
| 9. | 10.6% | Union, NC / 209,387 |
| 10. | 10.6% | Macon, NC / 33,840 |
| 11. | 10.4% | Brunswick, NC / 112,907 |
| 12. | 10.3% | Pender, NC / 54,218 |
| 13. | 9.9% | Guilford, NC / 500,899 |
| 14. | 9.9% | Granville, NC / 57,955 |
| 15. | 9.8% | Camden, NC / 10,127 |
| 16. | 9.6% | Henderson, NC / 108,642 |
| 17. | 9.6% | Carteret, NC / 67,851 |
| 18. | 9.3% | Franklin, NC / 61,723 |
| 19. | 9.1% | Cherokee, NC / 27,156 |
| 20. | 9.1% | Madison, NC / 20,951 |
| 21. | 9.1% | Cabarrus, NC / 184,855 |
| 22. | 9.0% | Iredell, NC / 162,999 |
| 23. | 9.0% | Alamance, NC / 153,713 |
| 24. | 9.0% | Polk, NC / 20,352 |
| 25. | 8.9% | Dare, NC / 34,530 |
| 26. | 8.9% | Clay, NC / 10,616 |
| 27. | 8.7% | Harnett, NC / 121,789 |
| 28. | 8.5% | Onslow, NC / 182,921 |
| 29. | 8.4% | Perquimans, NC / 13,507 |
| 29. | 8.4% | Gaston, NC / 208,379 |
| 31. | 8.3% | Johnston, NC / 175,343 |
| 32. | 8.2% | Lincoln, NC / 79,041 |
| 33. | 8.1% | Person, NC / 39,303 |
| 34. | 8.1% | Haywood, NC / 59,012 |
| 35. | 7.9% | Transylvania, NC / 32,943 |
| 35. | 7.9% | Davidson, NC / 163,545 |
| 37. | 7.9% | Gates, NC / 11,877 |
| 38. | 7.9% | Moore, NC / 90,579 |
| 39. | 7.9% | Chowan, NC / 14,703 |
| 40. | 7.8% | Davie, NC / 41,411 |
| 41. | 7.8% | Currituck, NC / 24,212 |
| 41. | 7.8% | Lee, NC / 59,096 |
| 43. | 7.7% | Cumberland, NC / 324,002 |
| 44. | 7.6% | Pamlico, NC / 13,062 |
| 45. | 7.4% | Rockingham, NC / 92,602 |
| 46. | 7.4% | Alleghany, NC / 10,974 |
| 47. | 7.3% | Watauga, NC / 51,903 |
| 48. | 7.3% | Avery, NC / 17,739 |
| 49. | 7.3% | Catawba, NC / 154,457 |
| 50. | 7.2% | Craven, NC / 104,574 |
| 51. | 7.2% | Yadkin, NC / 38,101 |
| 52. | 7.2% | Jones, NC / 10,184 |
| 53. | 7.1% | Jackson, NC / 40,598 |
| 54. | 7.0% | Cleveland, NC / 97,464 |
| 55. | 6.9% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,233 |
| 55. | 6.9% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,982 |
| 57. | 6.6% | Surry, NC / 73,391 |
| 58. | 6.5% | Halifax, NC / 53,803 |
| 59. | 6.5% | Vance, NC / 44,998 |
| 60. | 6.4% | Wilson, NC / 81,499 |
| 61. | 6.4% | Ashe, NC / 27,173 |
| 62. | 6.4% | Wilkes, NC / 69,093 |
| 62. | 6.4% | Nash, NC / 95,174 |
| 64. | 6.3% | Pitt, NC / 172,438 |
| 65. | 6.1% | Warren, NC / 20,628 |
| 66. | 6.1% | Rowan, NC / 138,246 |
| 67. | 6.1% | Burke, NC / 90,164 |
| 68. | 6.0% | Rutherford, NC / 67,181 |
| 69. | 6.0% | Alexander, NC / 37,175 |
| 70. | 5.9% | Stokes, NC / 46,858 |
| 71. | 5.9% | Hoke, NC / 50,034 |
| 72. | 5.9% | Randolph, NC / 142,276 |
| 73. | 5.9% | Scotland, NC / 36,034 |
| 74. | 5.8% | Richmond, NC / 46,317 |
| 75. | 5.8% | Stanly, NC / 60,553 |
| 76. | 5.8% | Edgecombe, NC / 55,779 |
| 77. | 5.5% | Beaufort, NC / 47,587 |
| 78. | 5.5% | Caswell, NC / 23,357 |
| 79. | 5.5% | Swain, NC / 14,070 |
| 80. | 5.4% | Montgomery, NC / 27,626 |
| 81. | 5.3% | Yancey, NC / 17,662 |
| 82. | 5.3% | Anson, NC / 26,309 |
| 83. | 5.3% | Wayne, NC / 124,093 |
| 84. | 5.2% | Sampson, NC / 63,842 |
| 85. | 5.2% | Columbus, NC / 57,512 |
| 86. | 5.2% | Mitchell, NC / 15,380 |
| 87. | 5.1% | Lenoir, NC / 59,095 |
| 88. | 5.0% | Northampton, NC / 21,310 |
| 89. | 4.9% | Washington, NC / 12,837 |
| 90. | 4.8% | Duplin, NC / 59,455 |
| 91. | 4.8% | Bertie, NC / 20,677 |
| 92. | 4.5% | Caldwell, NC / 82,140 |
| 93. | 4.5% | Greene, NC / 21,353 |
| 94. | 4.5% | Robeson, NC / 134,913 |
| 95. | 4.4% | Hertford, NC / 24,460 |
| 96. | 4.1% | Martin, NC / 23,947 |
| 97. | 3.8% | Bladen, NC / 34,915 |
| 98. | 3.2% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,219 |
| 99. | 3.1% | Hyde, NC / 5,757 |
| 100. | 2.9% | Graham, NC / 8,743 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, Waste Management Services Workers Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, Waste Management Services Workers Percentage' data are not listed.