A total of 99 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 12.3% | Chowan, NC / 14,825 |
2. | 10.6% | Greene, NC / 21,386 |
3. | 10.1% | Warren, NC / 20,860 |
4. | 9.9% | Beaufort, NC / 47,542 |
5. | 9.7% | Scotland, NC / 36,266 |
6. | 9.4% | Perquimans, NC / 13,414 |
7. | 9.3% | Gates, NC / 12,069 |
8. | 9.2% | Northampton, NC / 21,959 |
9. | 8.8% | Granville, NC / 59,666 |
10. | 8.7% | Pamlico, NC / 13,145 |
11. | 8.6% | Halifax, NC / 54,693 |
12. | 8.6% | Bladen, NC / 34,922 |
13. | 8.3% | Wilson, NC / 81,020 |
14. | 8.1% | Hoke, NC / 47,368 |
15. | 7.9% | Duplin, NC / 58,510 |
16. | 7.8% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,551 |
17. | 7.7% | Franklin, NC / 60,470 |
18. | 7.4% | Robeson, NC / 133,920 |
19. | 7.2% | Columbus, NC / 57,612 |
20. | 7.2% | Bertie, NC / 21,035 |
21. | 7.1% | Pender, NC / 52,447 |
22. | 7.0% | Lincoln, NC / 78,052 |
23. | 7.0% | Martin, NC / 24,298 |
23. | 7.0% | Vance, NC / 45,183 |
25. | 6.9% | Alleghany, NC / 11,069 |
26. | 6.9% | Ashe, NC / 27,099 |
27. | 6.7% | Craven, NC / 102,904 |
28. | 6.5% | Surry, NC / 73,551 |
28. | 6.5% | Haywood, NC / 58,915 |
30. | 6.5% | Richmond, NC / 46,608 |
31. | 6.5% | Johnston, NC / 169,122 |
32. | 6.4% | Wilkes, NC / 69,265 |
33. | 6.4% | Rutherford, NC / 67,446 |
34. | 6.4% | Stokes, NC / 47,224 |
35. | 6.3% | Nash, NC / 95,545 |
36. | 6.3% | Washington, NC / 13,085 |
37. | 6.2% | Union, NC / 201,617 |
38. | 6.2% | Montgomery, NC / 27,741 |
39. | 6.2% | Harnett, NC / 115,559 |
40. | 6.1% | Dare, NC / 34,019 |
41. | 6.0% | Lenoir, NC / 59,372 |
42. | 5.9% | New Hanover, NC / 203,276 |
43. | 5.9% | Cabarrus, NC / 178,396 |
44. | 5.8% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,253 |
45. | 5.8% | Caswell, NC / 23,615 |
46. | 5.8% | Sampson, NC / 63,408 |
47. | 5.7% | Chatham, NC / 63,896 |
48. | 5.7% | Alamance, NC / 151,170 |
49. | 5.6% | Orange, NC / 133,958 |
50. | 5.6% | Madison, NC / 20,727 |
51. | 5.5% | Stanly, NC / 60,489 |
52. | 5.5% | Avery, NC / 17,815 |
53. | 5.4% | Pitt, NC / 167,951 |
53. | 5.4% | Cleveland, NC / 97,890 |
55. | 5.4% | Hertford, NC / 24,525 |
56. | 5.3% | Iredell, NC / 159,614 |
57. | 5.3% | Mecklenburg, NC / 926,873 |
57. | 5.3% | Forsyth, NC / 351,368 |
59. | 5.3% | Camden, NC / 9,965 |
60. | 5.3% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,367 |
61. | 5.2% | Davie, NC / 41,183 |
61. | 5.2% | Randolph, NC / 141,568 |
63. | 5.2% | Anson, NC / 26,699 |
64. | 5.2% | Currituck, NC / 23,677 |
65. | 5.1% | Lee, NC / 57,876 |
66. | 5.0% | Cumberland, NC / 319,329 |
67. | 4.9% | Rowan, NC / 138,189 |
68. | 4.9% | Gaston, NC / 206,291 |
69. | 4.7% | Carteret, NC / 66,415 |
70. | 4.7% | Buncombe, NC / 239,000 |
71. | 4.6% | Watauga, NC / 51,103 |
71. | 4.6% | Henderson, NC / 106,577 |
73. | 4.6% | Polk, NC / 20,386 |
74. | 4.6% | Brunswick, NC / 107,925 |
74. | 4.6% | Onslow, NC / 176,461 |
74. | 4.6% | Yancey, NC / 17,814 |
77. | 4.5% | Davidson, NC / 162,628 |
78. | 4.5% | Person, NC / 39,322 |
78. | 4.5% | Jones, NC / 10,144 |
80. | 4.3% | Burke, NC / 90,821 |
81. | 4.2% | Wayne, NC / 122,419 |
82. | 4.2% | Wake, NC / 905,573 |
83. | 4.1% | Yadkin, NC / 38,254 |
84. | 4.1% | Catawba, NC / 154,201 |
85. | 4.0% | Guilford, NC / 489,576 |
86. | 3.9% | Rockingham, NC / 93,264 |
87. | 3.9% | Macon, NC / 33,815 |
87. | 3.9% | Caldwell, NC / 82,493 |
89. | 3.9% | Mitchell, NC / 15,539 |
90. | 3.8% | Cherokee, NC / 27,304 |
91. | 3.8% | Moore, NC / 88,314 |
92. | 3.7% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,926 |
93. | 3.7% | Durham, NC / 269,283 |
94. | 3.5% | Graham, NC / 8,766 |
95. | 2.7% | Clay, NC / 10,575 |
96. | 2.7% | Transylvania, NC / 32,825 |
97. | 2.7% | Alexander, NC / 37,014 |
98. | 2.1% | Swain, NC / 13,995 |
99. | 2.1% | Jackson, NC / 39,985 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.