A total of 99 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 12.4% | Chowan, NC / 14,859 |
2. | 10.4% | Warren, NC / 20,810 |
3. | 10.3% | Duplin, NC / 56,657 |
4. | 9.9% | Bladen, NC / 34,629 |
5. | 9.6% | Camden, NC / 9,719 |
6. | 9.5% | Beaufort, NC / 47,185 |
7. | 9.4% | Hertford, NC / 24,384 |
8. | 9.4% | Alleghany, NC / 11,084 |
9. | 9.3% | Halifax, NC / 55,293 |
10. | 9.2% | Washington, NC / 13,248 |
11. | 8.9% | Greene, NC / 21,157 |
12. | 8.8% | Northampton, NC / 22,161 |
13. | 8.6% | Vance, NC / 44,975 |
14. | 8.3% | Scotland, NC / 36,325 |
15. | 7.9% | Richmond, NC / 46,477 |
16. | 7.8% | Madison, NC / 20,549 |
17. | 7.8% | Bertie, NC / 20,890 |
18. | 7.8% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,247 |
19. | 7.7% | Perquimans, NC / 13,091 |
20. | 7.6% | Stanly, NC / 60,109 |
21. | 7.5% | Pamlico, NC / 13,072 |
22. | 7.5% | Avery, NC / 17,951 |
23. | 7.2% | Yancey, NC / 17,911 |
24. | 7.1% | Lenoir, NC / 59,307 |
24. | 7.1% | Gates, NC / 12,039 |
26. | 7.1% | Haywood, NC / 58,597 |
27. | 6.9% | Robeson, NC / 131,708 |
28. | 6.7% | Chatham, NC / 61,426 |
29. | 6.7% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,167 |
30. | 6.6% | Granville, NC / 58,071 |
31. | 6.6% | Ashe, NC / 26,787 |
32. | 6.5% | Martin, NC / 24,471 |
33. | 6.5% | Nash, NC / 94,402 |
34. | 6.4% | Columbus, NC / 56,856 |
35. | 6.4% | Davie, NC / 40,581 |
35. | 6.4% | Person, NC / 38,942 |
37. | 6.3% | Franklin, NC / 58,473 |
38. | 6.3% | Wilkes, NC / 69,063 |
38. | 6.3% | Wilson, NC / 79,533 |
40. | 6.2% | Harnett, NC / 109,031 |
41. | 6.1% | Cabarrus, NC / 169,990 |
42. | 6.1% | Lincoln, NC / 75,697 |
43. | 6.0% | Montgomery, NC / 27,611 |
44. | 6.0% | Randolph, NC / 140,034 |
45. | 5.9% | Union, NC / 190,346 |
46. | 5.8% | Currituck, NC / 23,299 |
47. | 5.7% | Johnston, NC / 160,675 |
47. | 5.7% | Caswell, NC / 23,848 |
49. | 5.6% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,374 |
50. | 5.6% | Stokes, NC / 47,194 |
51. | 5.5% | Sampson, NC / 62,832 |
52. | 5.5% | Macon, NC / 33,453 |
53. | 5.5% | Onslow, NC / 169,207 |
53. | 5.5% | Buncombe, NC / 233,249 |
55. | 5.4% | Gaston, NC / 202,642 |
56. | 5.4% | Mecklenburg, NC / 882,761 |
57. | 5.4% | Pender, NC / 50,256 |
58. | 5.4% | Alamance, NC / 147,072 |
59. | 5.4% | Hoke, NC / 44,128 |
60. | 5.3% | Orange, NC / 129,562 |
61. | 5.3% | Craven, NC / 100,001 |
62. | 5.3% | Wayne, NC / 120,102 |
63. | 5.1% | Pitt, NC / 161,385 |
64. | 5.0% | New Hanover, NC / 197,272 |
64. | 5.0% | Rockingham, NC / 93,322 |
64. | 5.0% | Cleveland, NC / 97,786 |
67. | 5.0% | Iredell, NC / 154,632 |
68. | 5.0% | Graham, NC / 8,702 |
69. | 5.0% | Surry, NC / 73,287 |
70. | 4.9% | Cumberland, NC / 312,994 |
71. | 4.8% | Forsyth, NC / 342,989 |
72. | 4.8% | Davidson, NC / 160,638 |
73. | 4.7% | Dare, NC / 33,650 |
74. | 4.7% | Durham, NC / 258,578 |
75. | 4.6% | Polk, NC / 20,289 |
75. | 4.6% | Clay, NC / 10,418 |
77. | 4.5% | Rutherford, NC / 66,928 |
78. | 4.5% | Catawba, NC / 153,149 |
79. | 4.5% | Carteret, NC / 65,068 |
80. | 4.4% | Henderson, NC / 103,881 |
81. | 4.3% | Lee, NC / 55,576 |
82. | 4.2% | Guilford, NC / 475,786 |
83. | 4.1% | Anson, NC / 26,785 |
84. | 3.9% | Wake, NC / 850,546 |
85. | 3.9% | Mitchell, NC / 15,680 |
86. | 3.9% | Jackson, NC / 39,144 |
87. | 3.9% | Yadkin, NC / 38,158 |
88. | 3.8% | Rowan, NC / 136,880 |
89. | 3.7% | Watauga, NC / 49,705 |
90. | 3.6% | Burke, NC / 90,557 |
91. | 3.5% | Brunswick, NC / 101,994 |
92. | 3.5% | Caldwell, NC / 82,162 |
93. | 3.3% | Jones, NC / 10,060 |
94. | 3.1% | Moore, NC / 85,914 |
95. | 2.9% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,593 |
96. | 2.9% | Cherokee, NC / 27,317 |
97. | 2.6% | Alexander, NC / 36,797 |
98. | 2.3% | Transylvania, NC / 32,404 |
99. | 1.0% | Swain, NC / 13,861 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Percentage of Houses without a Mortgage where Total Holding Costs 30-40% of Owner Income' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.