A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Percentage of Houses with 3 Bedrooms ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 65.8% | Hyde, NC / 5,810 |
2. | 63.5% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,367 |
3. | 61.6% | Greene, NC / 21,386 |
4. | 60.9% | Johnston, NC / 169,122 |
5. | 60.1% | Northampton, NC / 21,959 |
6. | 60.0% | Hoke, NC / 47,368 |
7. | 59.1% | Franklin, NC / 60,470 |
8. | 58.2% | Pamlico, NC / 13,145 |
9. | 58.1% | Washington, NC / 13,085 |
10. | 58.1% | Perquimans, NC / 13,414 |
11. | 57.8% | Stokes, NC / 47,224 |
12. | 57.5% | Person, NC / 39,322 |
13. | 57.4% | Scotland, NC / 36,266 |
13. | 57.4% | Granville, NC / 59,666 |
15. | 56.9% | Duplin, NC / 58,510 |
16. | 56.5% | Jones, NC / 10,144 |
17. | 56.4% | Bladen, NC / 34,922 |
18. | 56.4% | Bertie, NC / 21,035 |
19. | 56.3% | Martin, NC / 24,298 |
20. | 56.2% | Harnett, NC / 115,559 |
21. | 56.1% | Camden, NC / 9,965 |
22. | 56.1% | Sampson, NC / 63,408 |
23. | 55.9% | Cherokee, NC / 27,304 |
24. | 55.4% | Robeson, NC / 133,920 |
25. | 55.1% | Randolph, NC / 141,568 |
26. | 55.0% | Columbus, NC / 57,612 |
27. | 55.0% | Anson, NC / 26,699 |
28. | 54.8% | Lee, NC / 57,876 |
29. | 54.8% | Wayne, NC / 122,419 |
30. | 54.7% | Yadkin, NC / 38,254 |
31. | 54.5% | Craven, NC / 102,904 |
32. | 54.1% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,253 |
32. | 54.1% | Stanly, NC / 60,489 |
34. | 53.6% | Gates, NC / 12,069 |
35. | 53.6% | Halifax, NC / 54,693 |
36. | 53.5% | Hertford, NC / 24,525 |
37. | 53.2% | Chowan, NC / 14,825 |
38. | 53.1% | Brunswick, NC / 107,925 |
39. | 52.8% | Caswell, NC / 23,615 |
40. | 52.8% | Cleveland, NC / 97,890 |
41. | 52.8% | Pender, NC / 52,447 |
42. | 52.7% | Lenoir, NC / 59,372 |
43. | 52.6% | Lincoln, NC / 78,052 |
44. | 52.6% | Chatham, NC / 63,896 |
45. | 52.6% | Cumberland, NC / 319,329 |
46. | 52.3% | Warren, NC / 20,860 |
47. | 52.3% | Beaufort, NC / 47,542 |
48. | 51.9% | Graham, NC / 8,766 |
49. | 51.8% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,551 |
50. | 51.6% | Moore, NC / 88,314 |
51. | 51.5% | Alexander, NC / 37,014 |
52. | 51.5% | Nash, NC / 95,545 |
53. | 51.3% | Vance, NC / 45,183 |
54. | 51.2% | Davidson, NC / 162,628 |
55. | 51.0% | Davie, NC / 41,183 |
56. | 50.9% | Polk, NC / 20,386 |
57. | 50.6% | Richmond, NC / 46,608 |
58. | 50.4% | Carteret, NC / 66,415 |
59. | 50.4% | Rockingham, NC / 93,264 |
60. | 50.4% | Henderson, NC / 106,577 |
61. | 50.2% | Rowan, NC / 138,189 |
62. | 50.1% | Iredell, NC / 159,614 |
63. | 50.0% | Onslow, NC / 176,461 |
64. | 49.7% | Surry, NC / 73,551 |
65. | 49.4% | Yancey, NC / 17,814 |
66. | 49.2% | Transylvania, NC / 32,825 |
67. | 48.8% | Alamance, NC / 151,170 |
68. | 48.8% | Union, NC / 201,617 |
69. | 48.7% | Wilson, NC / 81,020 |
70. | 48.5% | Clay, NC / 10,575 |
71. | 48.5% | Ashe, NC / 27,099 |
72. | 48.4% | Swain, NC / 13,995 |
73. | 48.4% | Wilkes, NC / 69,265 |
74. | 47.9% | Mitchell, NC / 15,539 |
75. | 47.8% | Caldwell, NC / 82,493 |
76. | 47.7% | Catawba, NC / 154,201 |
77. | 47.4% | Cabarrus, NC / 178,396 |
78. | 47.4% | Gaston, NC / 206,291 |
79. | 47.3% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,926 |
80. | 47.0% | Madison, NC / 20,727 |
81. | 47.0% | Haywood, NC / 58,915 |
82. | 46.8% | Burke, NC / 90,821 |
83. | 46.6% | Rutherford, NC / 67,446 |
84. | 46.5% | New Hanover, NC / 203,276 |
85. | 46.3% | Alleghany, NC / 11,069 |
86. | 45.9% | Pitt, NC / 167,951 |
87. | 45.4% | Macon, NC / 33,815 |
88. | 44.6% | Jackson, NC / 39,985 |
89. | 44.4% | Forsyth, NC / 351,368 |
90. | 42.7% | Buncombe, NC / 239,000 |
91. | 42.6% | Dare, NC / 34,019 |
92. | 42.3% | Montgomery, NC / 27,741 |
93. | 42.0% | Currituck, NC / 23,677 |
94. | 41.7% | Guilford, NC / 489,576 |
95. | 40.5% | Wake, NC / 905,573 |
96. | 39.6% | Watauga, NC / 51,103 |
97. | 39.6% | Durham, NC / 269,283 |
98. | 38.8% | Mecklenburg, NC / 926,873 |
99. | 38.6% | Avery, NC / 17,815 |
100. | 36.1% | Orange, NC / 133,958 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Percentage of Houses with 3 Bedrooms' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Percentage of Houses with 3 Bedrooms' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.