A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 76.3% | Union, NC / 201,617 |
2. | 75.3% | Camden, NC / 9,965 |
3. | 73.0% | Davie, NC / 41,183 |
4. | 72.0% | Chatham, NC / 63,896 |
5. | 69.8% | Gates, NC / 12,069 |
6. | 69.6% | Stokes, NC / 47,224 |
7. | 68.0% | Franklin, NC / 60,470 |
8. | 67.7% | Lincoln, NC / 78,052 |
9. | 67.2% | Yadkin, NC / 38,254 |
10. | 66.3% | Randolph, NC / 141,568 |
11. | 66.1% | Cabarrus, NC / 178,396 |
12. | 66.1% | Alexander, NC / 37,014 |
13. | 65.9% | Granville, NC / 59,666 |
14. | 64.9% | Surry, NC / 73,551 |
15. | 64.8% | Davidson, NC / 162,628 |
16. | 64.5% | Johnston, NC / 169,122 |
17. | 63.9% | Iredell, NC / 159,614 |
18. | 63.3% | Stanly, NC / 60,489 |
19. | 62.8% | Wilkes, NC / 69,265 |
20. | 62.7% | Henderson, NC / 106,577 |
21. | 62.6% | Rockingham, NC / 93,264 |
22. | 61.8% | Person, NC / 39,322 |
23. | 61.8% | Moore, NC / 88,314 |
24. | 61.8% | Burke, NC / 90,821 |
25. | 61.7% | Catawba, NC / 154,201 |
26. | 61.2% | Caswell, NC / 23,615 |
27. | 61.2% | Caldwell, NC / 82,493 |
28. | 61.0% | Alamance, NC / 151,170 |
29. | 61.0% | Rowan, NC / 138,189 |
30. | 60.9% | Perquimans, NC / 13,414 |
31. | 60.8% | Gaston, NC / 206,291 |
32. | 60.7% | Greene, NC / 21,386 |
33. | 60.5% | Wake, NC / 905,573 |
34. | 60.4% | Lee, NC / 57,876 |
35. | 60.0% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,926 |
36. | 60.0% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,367 |
37. | 59.5% | Harnett, NC / 115,559 |
38. | 59.3% | Columbus, NC / 57,612 |
39. | 59.2% | Pender, NC / 52,447 |
40. | 59.2% | Sampson, NC / 63,408 |
41. | 59.0% | Jones, NC / 10,144 |
42. | 58.9% | Bertie, NC / 21,035 |
43. | 58.9% | Duplin, NC / 58,510 |
44. | 58.8% | Rutherford, NC / 67,446 |
45. | 58.6% | Hoke, NC / 47,368 |
46. | 58.4% | Madison, NC / 20,727 |
47. | 58.4% | Buncombe, NC / 239,000 |
48. | 58.4% | Cleveland, NC / 97,890 |
49. | 58.2% | Washington, NC / 13,085 |
50. | 58.0% | Richmond, NC / 46,608 |
51. | 57.7% | Polk, NC / 20,386 |
52. | 57.4% | Mitchell, NC / 15,539 |
53. | 57.3% | Forsyth, NC / 351,368 |
54. | 57.0% | Anson, NC / 26,699 |
55. | 56.7% | Nash, NC / 95,545 |
56. | 56.7% | Haywood, NC / 58,915 |
57. | 56.6% | Craven, NC / 102,904 |
58. | 56.6% | Martin, NC / 24,298 |
59. | 56.5% | Robeson, NC / 133,920 |
60. | 56.4% | Transylvania, NC / 32,825 |
61. | 56.3% | Pamlico, NC / 13,145 |
62. | 56.3% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,551 |
63. | 56.1% | Beaufort, NC / 47,542 |
64. | 55.9% | Scotland, NC / 36,266 |
65. | 55.6% | Guilford, NC / 489,576 |
66. | 55.4% | Wayne, NC / 122,419 |
67. | 55.3% | Mecklenburg, NC / 926,873 |
68. | 55.2% | Orange, NC / 133,958 |
69. | 54.5% | Bladen, NC / 34,922 |
70. | 54.3% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,253 |
71. | 54.1% | Wilson, NC / 81,020 |
72. | 54.1% | Hertford, NC / 24,525 |
73. | 54.0% | Ashe, NC / 27,099 |
74. | 53.7% | Chowan, NC / 14,825 |
75. | 53.1% | Lenoir, NC / 59,372 |
76. | 52.7% | Northampton, NC / 21,959 |
77. | 52.5% | Cherokee, NC / 27,304 |
78. | 52.4% | Halifax, NC / 54,693 |
79. | 51.2% | Vance, NC / 45,183 |
80. | 50.9% | Currituck, NC / 23,677 |
81. | 50.7% | Yancey, NC / 17,814 |
82. | 50.4% | New Hanover, NC / 203,276 |
83. | 50.2% | Clay, NC / 10,575 |
84. | 49.9% | Durham, NC / 269,283 |
85. | 49.4% | Cumberland, NC / 319,329 |
86. | 49.1% | Swain, NC / 13,995 |
87. | 48.5% | Graham, NC / 8,766 |
88. | 48.4% | Onslow, NC / 176,461 |
89. | 48.1% | Pitt, NC / 167,951 |
90. | 47.3% | Brunswick, NC / 107,925 |
91. | 46.8% | Macon, NC / 33,815 |
92. | 46.7% | Montgomery, NC / 27,741 |
93. | 45.4% | Warren, NC / 20,860 |
94. | 44.9% | Hyde, NC / 5,810 |
95. | 44.1% | Alleghany, NC / 11,069 |
96. | 41.5% | Carteret, NC / 66,415 |
97. | 41.2% | Jackson, NC / 39,985 |
98. | 37.7% | Avery, NC / 17,815 |
99. | 36.2% | Watauga, NC / 51,103 |
100. | 32.5% | Dare, NC / 34,019 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.