Local Data Search
A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 75.7% | Union, NC / 201,292 |
| 2. | 73.6% | Camden, NC / 9,980 |
| 3. | 73.1% | Gates, NC / 12,197 |
| 4. | 72.3% | Davie, NC / 41,240 |
| 5. | 69.5% | Chatham, NC / 63,505 |
| 6. | 69.1% | Alexander, NC / 37,198 |
| 7. | 69.1% | Stokes, NC / 47,401 |
| 8. | 68.6% | Lincoln, NC / 78,265 |
| 9. | 68.0% | Yadkin, NC / 38,406 |
| 10. | 67.3% | Cabarrus, NC / 178,011 |
| 11. | 67.0% | Johnston, NC / 168,878 |
| 12. | 66.5% | Granville, NC / 59,916 |
| 13. | 66.2% | Randolph, NC / 141,752 |
| 14. | 65.8% | Caswell, NC / 23,719 |
| 15. | 64.8% | Iredell, NC / 159,437 |
| 16. | 64.6% | Surry, NC / 73,673 |
| 17. | 64.6% | Jones, NC / 10,153 |
| 18. | 64.5% | Davidson, NC / 162,878 |
| 19. | 64.2% | Hoke, NC / 46,952 |
| 20. | 64.1% | Franklin, NC / 60,619 |
| 21. | 63.9% | Caldwell, NC / 83,029 |
| 22. | 63.8% | Moore, NC / 88,247 |
| 23. | 63.8% | Wilkes, NC / 69,340 |
| 24. | 63.3% | Burke, NC / 90,912 |
| 25. | 63.2% | Stanly, NC / 60,585 |
| 26. | 63.1% | Catawba, NC / 154,358 |
| 27. | 63.0% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,996 |
| 28. | 62.8% | Person, NC / 39,464 |
| 29. | 62.4% | Henderson, NC / 106,740 |
| 30. | 62.0% | Bertie, NC / 21,282 |
| 31. | 61.9% | Greene, NC / 21,362 |
| 32. | 61.8% | Rockingham, NC / 93,643 |
| 33. | 61.4% | Rowan, NC / 138,428 |
| 34. | 61.4% | Madison, NC / 20,764 |
| 35. | 61.4% | Columbus, NC / 58,098 |
| 36. | 61.3% | Sampson, NC / 63,431 |
| 37. | 61.1% | Cleveland, NC / 98,078 |
| 38. | 60.8% | Lee, NC / 57,866 |
| 39. | 60.8% | Gaston, NC / 206,086 |
| 40. | 60.7% | Perquimans, NC / 13,453 |
| 41. | 60.6% | Wake, NC / 900,993 |
| 42. | 60.4% | Duplin, NC / 58,505 |
| 43. | 60.2% | Alamance, NC / 151,131 |
| 44. | 60.0% | Martin, NC / 24,505 |
| 45. | 59.5% | Harnett, NC / 114,678 |
| 46. | 59.4% | Polk, NC / 20,510 |
| 47. | 59.4% | Robeson, NC / 134,168 |
| 48. | 59.4% | Washington, NC / 13,228 |
| 49. | 58.9% | Bladen, NC / 35,190 |
| 50. | 58.9% | Mitchell, NC / 15,579 |
| 51. | 58.8% | Pender, NC / 52,217 |
| 52. | 58.8% | Hertford, NC / 24,669 |
| 53. | 58.5% | Craven, NC / 103,505 |
| 54. | 58.4% | Richmond, NC / 46,639 |
| 55. | 58.4% | Rutherford, NC / 67,810 |
| 56. | 58.2% | Buncombe, NC / 238,318 |
| 57. | 57.9% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,661 |
| 58. | 57.9% | Nash, NC / 95,840 |
| 59. | 57.9% | Anson, NC / 26,948 |
| 60. | 57.6% | Pamlico, NC / 13,144 |
| 61. | 57.6% | Chowan, NC / 14,793 |
| 62. | 57.5% | Forsyth, NC / 350,670 |
| 63. | 57.4% | Beaufort, NC / 47,759 |
| 64. | 57.3% | Northampton, NC / 22,099 |
| 65. | 57.1% | Scotland, NC / 36,157 |
| 66. | 56.7% | Transylvania, NC / 33,090 |
| 67. | 56.3% | Wayne, NC / 122,623 |
| 68. | 55.9% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,407 |
| 69. | 55.6% | Orange, NC / 133,801 |
| 70. | 55.2% | Lenoir, NC / 59,495 |
| 71. | 55.1% | Mecklenburg, NC / 919,628 |
| 72. | 54.8% | Guilford, NC / 488,406 |
| 73. | 54.6% | Halifax, NC / 54,691 |
| 74. | 54.3% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,552 |
| 75. | 54.2% | Haywood, NC / 59,036 |
| 76. | 54.1% | Wilson, NC / 81,234 |
| 77. | 53.6% | Vance, NC / 45,422 |
| 78. | 53.6% | Cherokee, NC / 27,444 |
| 79. | 52.9% | Yancey, NC / 17,818 |
| 80. | 52.8% | Ashe, NC / 27,281 |
| 81. | 51.4% | Clay, NC / 10,587 |
| 82. | 51.2% | Warren, NC / 20,972 |
| 83. | 50.7% | New Hanover, NC / 202,667 |
| 84. | 50.5% | Cumberland, NC / 319,431 |
| 85. | 50.3% | Onslow, NC / 177,772 |
| 86. | 50.0% | Graham, NC / 8,861 |
| 87. | 49.6% | Currituck, NC / 23,547 |
| 88. | 49.3% | Durham, NC / 267,587 |
| 89. | 49.2% | Pitt, NC / 168,148 |
| 90. | 48.5% | Montgomery, NC / 27,798 |
| 91. | 48.2% | Swain, NC / 13,981 |
| 92. | 46.5% | Hyde, NC / 5,810 |
| 93. | 46.1% | Brunswick, NC / 107,431 |
| 94. | 44.7% | Macon, NC / 33,922 |
| 95. | 44.2% | Alleghany, NC / 11,155 |
| 96. | 42.8% | Carteret, NC / 66,469 |
| 97. | 40.9% | Jackson, NC / 40,271 |
| 98. | 36.7% | Avery, NC / 17,797 |
| 99. | 36.0% | Watauga, NC / 51,079 |
| 100. | 30.2% | Dare, NC / 33,920 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Owner Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.