Local Data Search
A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 93.4% | Union, NC / 209,387 |
| 2. | 92.4% | Wake, NC / 952,513 |
| 3. | 91.8% | Durham, NC / 282,422 |
| 4. | 91.6% | Orange, NC / 137,275 |
| 5. | 91.4% | Mecklenburg, NC / 968,500 |
| 6. | 90.5% | Alamance, NC / 153,713 |
| 7. | 90.3% | Chatham, NC / 66,050 |
| 8. | 90.0% | Guilford, NC / 500,899 |
| 9. | 89.9% | Wilson, NC / 81,499 |
| 10. | 89.5% | Wayne, NC / 124,093 |
| 11. | 89.4% | Forsyth, NC / 358,130 |
| 12. | 89.3% | Cabarrus, NC / 184,855 |
| 13. | 89.2% | Johnston, NC / 175,343 |
| 14. | 89.2% | Lincoln, NC / 79,041 |
| 15. | 88.7% | Randolph, NC / 142,276 |
| 16. | 88.6% | Gaston, NC / 208,379 |
| 17. | 88.5% | Buncombe, NC / 244,599 |
| 18. | 88.5% | Davie, NC / 41,411 |
| 19. | 88.3% | Davidson, NC / 163,545 |
| 20. | 87.8% | Lee, NC / 59,096 |
| 21. | 87.8% | Nash, NC / 95,174 |
| 22. | 87.8% | Yadkin, NC / 38,101 |
| 23. | 87.7% | Craven, NC / 104,574 |
| 24. | 87.7% | Camden, NC / 10,127 |
| 25. | 87.6% | Richmond, NC / 46,317 |
| 26. | 87.6% | Franklin, NC / 61,723 |
| 27. | 87.6% | Pitt, NC / 172,438 |
| 28. | 87.5% | Greene, NC / 21,353 |
| 29. | 87.5% | Surry, NC / 73,391 |
| 30. | 87.1% | Cumberland, NC / 324,002 |
| 31. | 86.8% | Granville, NC / 57,955 |
| 32. | 86.7% | Iredell, NC / 162,999 |
| 33. | 86.6% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,233 |
| 34. | 86.5% | Robeson, NC / 134,913 |
| 35. | 86.5% | Gates, NC / 11,877 |
| 36. | 86.5% | Rowan, NC / 138,246 |
| 37. | 86.5% | Harnett, NC / 121,789 |
| 38. | 86.4% | Stanly, NC / 60,553 |
| 39. | 86.4% | Cleveland, NC / 97,464 |
| 40. | 86.4% | Rockingham, NC / 92,602 |
| 41. | 86.4% | Hoke, NC / 50,034 |
| 42. | 86.3% | Sampson, NC / 63,842 |
| 43. | 86.3% | Lenoir, NC / 59,095 |
| 44. | 86.3% | Stokes, NC / 46,858 |
| 45. | 86.2% | Catawba, NC / 154,457 |
| 46. | 86.0% | Duplin, NC / 59,455 |
| 47. | 85.3% | Columbus, NC / 57,512 |
| 48. | 85.2% | Scotland, NC / 36,034 |
| 49. | 84.9% | Burke, NC / 90,164 |
| 49. | 84.9% | Edgecombe, NC / 55,779 |
| 51. | 84.7% | Alexander, NC / 37,175 |
| 52. | 84.6% | New Hanover, NC / 209,586 |
| 53. | 84.5% | Jones, NC / 10,184 |
| 54. | 84.3% | Onslow, NC / 182,921 |
| 55. | 84.2% | Person, NC / 39,303 |
| 56. | 83.7% | Halifax, NC / 53,803 |
| 57. | 83.4% | Caldwell, NC / 82,140 |
| 58. | 83.2% | Vance, NC / 44,998 |
| 59. | 82.9% | Moore, NC / 90,579 |
| 60. | 82.8% | Wilkes, NC / 69,093 |
| 60. | 82.8% | Chowan, NC / 14,703 |
| 62. | 82.7% | Henderson, NC / 108,642 |
| 63. | 82.7% | Anson, NC / 26,309 |
| 64. | 82.3% | Hertford, NC / 24,460 |
| 65. | 82.2% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,982 |
| 66. | 81.5% | Bladen, NC / 34,915 |
| 67. | 81.4% | Martin, NC / 23,947 |
| 68. | 81.2% | Caswell, NC / 23,357 |
| 69. | 79.5% | Washington, NC / 12,837 |
| 70. | 79.1% | Rutherford, NC / 67,181 |
| 71. | 78.5% | Madison, NC / 20,951 |
| 72. | 78.3% | Bertie, NC / 20,677 |
| 73. | 78.0% | Perquimans, NC / 13,507 |
| 74. | 76.6% | Polk, NC / 20,352 |
| 75. | 75.4% | Beaufort, NC / 47,587 |
| 76. | 74.9% | Haywood, NC / 59,012 |
| 77. | 74.9% | Pender, NC / 54,218 |
| 78. | 73.9% | Northampton, NC / 21,310 |
| 79. | 73.5% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,219 |
| 80. | 73.2% | Mitchell, NC / 15,380 |
| 81. | 71.2% | Transylvania, NC / 32,943 |
| 82. | 68.1% | Pamlico, NC / 13,062 |
| 83. | 67.5% | Ashe, NC / 27,173 |
| 84. | 66.9% | Warren, NC / 20,628 |
| 85. | 66.6% | Montgomery, NC / 27,626 |
| 86. | 65.5% | Yancey, NC / 17,662 |
| 87. | 62.1% | Watauga, NC / 51,903 |
| 88. | 62.1% | Currituck, NC / 24,212 |
| 89. | 61.5% | Hyde, NC / 5,757 |
| 90. | 61.3% | Macon, NC / 33,840 |
| 91. | 61.1% | Swain, NC / 14,070 |
| 92. | 60.9% | Brunswick, NC / 112,907 |
| 93. | 60.6% | Clay, NC / 10,616 |
| 94. | 60.6% | Jackson, NC / 40,598 |
| 95. | 60.4% | Carteret, NC / 67,851 |
| 96. | 59.6% | Cherokee, NC / 27,156 |
| 97. | 58.5% | Alleghany, NC / 10,974 |
| 98. | 57.2% | Graham, NC / 8,743 |
| 99. | 51.4% | Avery, NC / 17,739 |
| 100. | 44.1% | Dare, NC / 34,530 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.