Local Data Search
A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
| Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
| 1. | 95.0% | Union, NC / 123,677 |
| 2. | 93.8% | Gaston, NC / 190,365 |
| 3. | 93.7% | Cabarrus, NC / 131,063 |
| 4. | 93.5% | Guilford, NC / 421,048 |
| 5. | 93.5% | Lincoln, NC / 63,780 |
| 6. | 93.5% | Wake, NC / 627,846 |
| 7. | 93.4% | Mecklenburg, NC / 695,454 |
| 8. | 93.3% | Durham, NC / 223,314 |
| 9. | 93.2% | Alexander, NC / 33,603 |
| 10. | 93.2% | Davidson, NC / 147,246 |
| 11. | 93.1% | Wilson, NC / 73,814 |
| 12. | 93.1% | Randolph, NC / 130,454 |
| 13. | 93.1% | Forsyth, NC / 306,067 |
| 13. | 93.1% | Granville, NC / 48,498 |
| 15. | 93.1% | Orange, NC / 118,227 |
| 16. | 93.0% | Alamance, NC / 130,800 |
| 17. | 92.8% | Johnston, NC / 121,965 |
| 18. | 92.8% | Lee, NC / 49,040 |
| 19. | 92.7% | Catawba, NC / 141,685 |
| 20. | 92.5% | Rowan, NC / 130,340 |
| 21. | 92.4% | Chatham, NC / 49,329 |
| 22. | 92.3% | Burke, NC / 89,148 |
| 23. | 92.1% | Hertford, NC / 22,601 |
| 24. | 92.0% | Caldwell, NC / 77,415 |
| 25. | 92.0% | Rockingham, NC / 91,928 |
| 26. | 92.0% | Davie, NC / 34,835 |
| 27. | 91.9% | Cleveland, NC / 96,287 |
| 28. | 91.7% | Yadkin, NC / 36,348 |
| 29. | 91.7% | Martin, NC / 25,593 |
| 30. | 91.5% | Surry, NC / 71,219 |
| 31. | 91.4% | Robeson, NC / 123,339 |
| 32. | 91.3% | Buncombe, NC / 206,330 |
| 33. | 91.3% | Stokes, NC / 44,711 |
| 34. | 91.2% | Iredell, NC / 122,660 |
| 35. | 91.2% | Scotland, NC / 35,998 |
| 36. | 91.1% | Wilkes, NC / 65,632 |
| 37. | 90.9% | Greene, NC / 18,974 |
| 38. | 90.9% | Hoke, NC / 33,646 |
| 38. | 90.9% | Person, NC / 35,623 |
| 40. | 90.8% | Nash, NC / 87,420 |
| 41. | 90.7% | Craven, NC / 91,436 |
| 41. | 90.7% | Cumberland, NC / 302,963 |
| 43. | 90.4% | Stanly, NC / 58,100 |
| 44. | 90.4% | Mcdowell, NC / 42,151 |
| 45. | 90.3% | Pasquotank, NC / 34,897 |
| 46. | 90.3% | Caswell, NC / 23,501 |
| 47. | 90.1% | Wayne, NC / 113,329 |
| 48. | 90.1% | Anson, NC / 25,275 |
| 49. | 90.0% | Pitt, NC / 133,798 |
| 50. | 89.9% | Richmond, NC / 46,564 |
| 51. | 89.5% | Camden, NC / 6,885 |
| 52. | 89.0% | Vance, NC / 42,954 |
| 53. | 89.0% | Duplin, NC / 49,063 |
| 54. | 88.9% | Gates, NC / 10,516 |
| 55. | 88.6% | Sampson, NC / 60,161 |
| 56. | 88.6% | Columbus, NC / 54,749 |
| 57. | 87.8% | Lenoir, NC / 59,648 |
| 58. | 87.6% | Franklin, NC / 47,260 |
| 59. | 87.6% | Harnett, NC / 91,025 |
| 60. | 87.4% | Halifax, NC / 57,370 |
| 61. | 87.4% | Moore, NC / 74,769 |
| 62. | 87.0% | Henderson, NC / 89,173 |
| 63. | 86.9% | Washington, NC / 13,723 |
| 64. | 86.8% | Jones, NC / 10,381 |
| 65. | 86.6% | Chowan, NC / 14,526 |
| 66. | 86.4% | Onslow, NC / 150,355 |
| 67. | 86.0% | Polk, NC / 18,324 |
| 68. | 85.6% | New Hanover, NC / 160,307 |
| 69. | 85.6% | Bertie, NC / 19,773 |
| 70. | 85.3% | Rutherford, NC / 62,899 |
| 71. | 85.0% | Edgecombe, NC / 55,606 |
| 72. | 84.2% | Bladen, NC / 32,278 |
| 73. | 83.1% | Northampton, NC / 22,086 |
| 74. | 82.8% | Beaufort, NC / 44,958 |
| 75. | 82.7% | Mitchell, NC / 15,687 |
| 76. | 82.3% | Madison, NC / 19,635 |
| 77. | 80.7% | Haywood, NC / 54,033 |
| 78. | 79.2% | Transylvania, NC / 29,334 |
| 79. | 78.5% | Ashe, NC / 24,384 |
| 80. | 77.2% | Pender, NC / 41,082 |
| 81. | 76.9% | Perquimans, NC / 11,368 |
| 82. | 76.8% | Yancey, NC / 17,774 |
| 83. | 76.6% | Cherokee, NC / 24,298 |
| 84. | 76.4% | Pamlico, NC / 12,934 |
| 85. | 75.6% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,149 |
| 86. | 73.1% | Warren, NC / 19,972 |
| 87. | 72.3% | Swain, NC / 12,968 |
| 88. | 71.6% | Alleghany, NC / 10,677 |
| 89. | 71.4% | Watauga, NC / 42,695 |
| 90. | 70.9% | Clay, NC / 8,775 |
| 91. | 69.6% | Montgomery, NC / 26,822 |
| 92. | 68.4% | Jackson, NC / 33,121 |
| 93. | 66.2% | Hyde, NC / 5,826 |
| 94. | 66.0% | Graham, NC / 7,993 |
| 95. | 64.6% | Currituck, NC / 18,190 |
| 96. | 61.8% | Macon, NC / 29,811 |
| 97. | 61.6% | Carteret, NC / 59,383 |
| 98. | 59.2% | Brunswick, NC / 73,143 |
| 99. | 54.8% | Avery, NC / 17,167 |
| 100. | 47.6% | Dare, NC / 29,967 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.