A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Female in Labor Force Population Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 66.7% | Mecklenburg, NC / 882,761 |
2. | 65.9% | Durham, NC / 258,578 |
3. | 65.5% | Wake, NC / 850,546 |
4. | 64.7% | Dare, NC / 33,650 |
5. | 63.5% | Currituck, NC / 23,299 |
6. | 63.1% | Cabarrus, NC / 169,990 |
7. | 62.6% | Union, NC / 190,346 |
8. | 62.4% | Orange, NC / 129,562 |
9. | 62.3% | New Hanover, NC / 197,272 |
10. | 62.2% | Lee, NC / 55,576 |
11. | 62.2% | Pitt, NC / 161,385 |
12. | 62.1% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,167 |
13. | 61.6% | Guilford, NC / 475,786 |
14. | 61.3% | Johnston, NC / 160,675 |
15. | 60.6% | Alamance, NC / 147,072 |
16. | 60.1% | Greene, NC / 21,157 |
17. | 59.9% | Nash, NC / 94,402 |
18. | 59.9% | Cumberland, NC / 312,994 |
19. | 59.6% | Davidson, NC / 160,638 |
20. | 59.5% | Randolph, NC / 140,034 |
21. | 59.4% | Camden, NC / 9,719 |
22. | 59.3% | Lincoln, NC / 75,697 |
23. | 59.3% | Forsyth, NC / 342,989 |
24. | 59.0% | Hoke, NC / 44,128 |
25. | 59.0% | Buncombe, NC / 233,249 |
26. | 58.8% | Catawba, NC / 153,149 |
27. | 58.7% | Iredell, NC / 154,632 |
28. | 58.3% | Onslow, NC / 169,207 |
29. | 58.1% | Hyde, NC / 5,721 |
30. | 58.1% | Watauga, NC / 49,705 |
31. | 58.1% | Wayne, NC / 120,102 |
32. | 58.0% | Granville, NC / 58,071 |
33. | 57.9% | Gaston, NC / 202,642 |
34. | 57.7% | Yadkin, NC / 38,158 |
35. | 57.4% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,374 |
36. | 56.8% | Wilson, NC / 79,533 |
37. | 56.8% | Franklin, NC / 58,473 |
38. | 56.7% | Sampson, NC / 62,832 |
39. | 56.7% | Stokes, NC / 47,194 |
40. | 56.7% | Person, NC / 38,942 |
41. | 56.6% | Rowan, NC / 136,880 |
42. | 56.5% | Chatham, NC / 61,426 |
43. | 56.4% | Burke, NC / 90,557 |
44. | 56.3% | Stanly, NC / 60,109 |
45. | 56.3% | Jackson, NC / 39,144 |
46. | 56.2% | Davie, NC / 40,581 |
47. | 56.2% | Pender, NC / 50,256 |
48. | 56.1% | Carteret, NC / 65,068 |
49. | 56.0% | Mcdowell, NC / 44,593 |
50. | 55.9% | Alexander, NC / 36,797 |
51. | 55.8% | Harnett, NC / 109,031 |
52. | 55.1% | Anson, NC / 26,785 |
53. | 54.9% | Gates, NC / 12,039 |
53. | 54.9% | Washington, NC / 13,248 |
55. | 54.8% | Rockingham, NC / 93,322 |
56. | 54.6% | Surry, NC / 73,287 |
57. | 54.6% | Lenoir, NC / 59,307 |
58. | 54.6% | Hertford, NC / 24,384 |
59. | 54.5% | Craven, NC / 100,001 |
60. | 53.9% | Wilkes, NC / 69,063 |
61. | 53.9% | Avery, NC / 17,951 |
61. | 53.9% | Cleveland, NC / 97,786 |
63. | 53.9% | Caswell, NC / 23,848 |
64. | 53.8% | Bertie, NC / 20,890 |
65. | 53.7% | Duplin, NC / 56,657 |
66. | 53.6% | Caldwell, NC / 82,162 |
67. | 53.4% | Martin, NC / 24,471 |
68. | 53.4% | Brunswick, NC / 101,994 |
69. | 53.1% | Edgecombe, NC / 56,247 |
70. | 53.0% | Beaufort, NC / 47,185 |
71. | 52.8% | Columbus, NC / 56,856 |
72. | 52.6% | Halifax, NC / 55,293 |
73. | 52.5% | Haywood, NC / 58,597 |
74. | 52.5% | Henderson, NC / 103,881 |
75. | 52.5% | Ashe, NC / 26,787 |
76. | 51.9% | Rutherford, NC / 66,928 |
77. | 51.6% | Vance, NC / 44,975 |
78. | 51.6% | Swain, NC / 13,861 |
79. | 51.6% | Jones, NC / 10,060 |
80. | 51.4% | Madison, NC / 20,549 |
81. | 51.3% | Graham, NC / 8,702 |
82. | 50.9% | Northampton, NC / 22,161 |
83. | 50.7% | Bladen, NC / 34,629 |
84. | 50.0% | Montgomery, NC / 27,611 |
85. | 49.7% | Robeson, NC / 131,708 |
86. | 49.4% | Macon, NC / 33,453 |
87. | 49.2% | Pamlico, NC / 13,072 |
88. | 49.2% | Cherokee, NC / 27,317 |
88. | 49.2% | Moore, NC / 85,914 |
90. | 48.9% | Clay, NC / 10,418 |
91. | 48.8% | Scotland, NC / 36,325 |
92. | 48.7% | Mitchell, NC / 15,680 |
93. | 48.3% | Perquimans, NC / 13,091 |
94. | 48.0% | Yancey, NC / 17,911 |
95. | 47.6% | Chowan, NC / 14,859 |
96. | 47.3% | Polk, NC / 20,289 |
97. | 47.3% | Transylvania, NC / 32,404 |
98. | 46.6% | Richmond, NC / 46,477 |
99. | 46.2% | Warren, NC / 20,810 |
100. | 43.1% | Alleghany, NC / 11,084 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Female in Labor Force Population Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Female in Labor Force Population Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.