A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Employed Male Civilian Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 59.2% | Montgomery, NC / 27,456 |
2. | 58.0% | Alleghany, NC / 10,905 |
3. | 56.4% | Mitchell, NC / 15,690 |
4. | 56.0% | Duplin, NC / 52,358 |
5. | 55.7% | Yancey, NC / 18,336 |
6. | 55.6% | Granville, NC / 55,670 |
7. | 55.5% | Union, NC / 181,852 |
8. | 55.1% | Jones, NC / 10,028 |
9. | 55.0% | Caldwell, NC / 79,382 |
10. | 54.9% | Pamlico, NC / 12,470 |
11. | 54.8% | Alexander, NC / 36,278 |
12. | 54.6% | Polk, NC / 19,107 |
13. | 54.6% | Lincoln, NC / 72,728 |
14. | 54.6% | Transylvania, NC / 29,886 |
15. | 54.5% | Sampson, NC / 62,996 |
16. | 54.5% | Iredell, NC / 150,346 |
17. | 54.2% | Davidson, NC / 156,033 |
18. | 54.2% | Dare, NC / 33,976 |
19. | 54.2% | Gates, NC / 11,555 |
20. | 54.2% | Johnston, NC / 156,888 |
21. | 54.1% | Randolph, NC / 139,443 |
22. | 54.0% | Madison, NC / 20,227 |
23. | 53.9% | Wake, NC / 828,759 |
24. | 53.9% | Catawba, NC / 155,157 |
25. | 53.8% | Stanly, NC / 59,136 |
26. | 53.8% | Person, NC / 37,301 |
27. | 53.7% | Franklin, NC / 57,201 |
28. | 53.7% | Carteret, NC / 63,369 |
29. | 53.7% | Rowan, NC / 137,387 |
30. | 53.6% | Watauga, NC / 44,636 |
31. | 53.6% | Richmond, NC / 45,947 |
32. | 53.6% | Cabarrus, NC / 161,473 |
33. | 53.4% | Davie, NC / 40,297 |
34. | 53.4% | Beaufort, NC / 45,993 |
34. | 53.4% | Surry, NC / 72,166 |
36. | 53.4% | Chatham, NC / 61,444 |
37. | 53.3% | Avery, NC / 17,903 |
38. | 53.2% | Chowan, NC / 14,629 |
39. | 53.1% | Macon, NC / 32,607 |
40. | 53.0% | Wilkes, NC / 66,563 |
41. | 53.0% | Ashe, NC / 25,467 |
42. | 53.0% | Mecklenburg, NC / 861,189 |
43. | 53.0% | Gaston, NC / 202,149 |
44. | 52.9% | Brunswick, NC / 98,712 |
45. | 52.9% | Henderson, NC / 100,333 |
46. | 52.8% | Haywood, NC / 56,535 |
47. | 52.8% | Rockingham, NC / 92,007 |
48. | 52.7% | Robeson, NC / 127,686 |
49. | 52.6% | Mcdowell, NC / 43,587 |
50. | 52.5% | Moore, NC / 84,280 |
51. | 52.4% | Burke, NC / 88,987 |
52. | 52.4% | Perquimans, NC / 12,367 |
53. | 52.2% | Cherokee, NC / 26,203 |
54. | 52.2% | Caswell, NC / 23,228 |
54. | 52.2% | Yadkin, NC / 37,520 |
56. | 52.2% | Stokes, NC / 45,916 |
57. | 52.0% | Wilson, NC / 76,765 |
58. | 51.9% | Pender, NC / 49,408 |
59. | 51.9% | Warren, NC / 19,545 |
60. | 51.9% | Alamance, NC / 144,769 |
61. | 51.9% | Harnett, NC / 108,885 |
62. | 51.8% | Cleveland, NC / 98,331 |
63. | 51.8% | Guilford, NC / 464,041 |
64. | 51.7% | Bertie, NC / 19,187 |
65. | 51.5% | Forsyth, NC / 346,851 |
66. | 51.4% | Buncombe, NC / 225,869 |
67. | 51.3% | Currituck, NC / 23,713 |
68. | 51.2% | Lee, NC / 57,919 |
69. | 51.1% | Jackson, NC / 36,447 |
70. | 51.0% | Anson, NC / 25,243 |
71. | 50.9% | New Hanover, NC / 189,463 |
72. | 50.9% | Clay, NC / 10,084 |
73. | 50.8% | Columbus, NC / 54,050 |
74. | 50.8% | Nash, NC / 92,814 |
75. | 50.5% | Lenoir, NC / 56,831 |
76. | 50.5% | Wayne, NC / 113,290 |
77. | 50.2% | Bladen, NC / 32,412 |
78. | 50.2% | Rutherford, NC / 63,153 |
79. | 50.1% | Pitt, NC / 151,931 |
80. | 49.5% | Scotland, NC / 36,394 |
81. | 49.5% | Edgecombe, NC / 52,586 |
82. | 49.5% | Greene, NC / 20,402 |
82. | 49.5% | Swain, NC / 13,367 |
84. | 49.4% | Durham, NC / 256,296 |
85. | 49.4% | Hyde, NC / 5,256 |
86. | 49.4% | Orange, NC / 124,503 |
87. | 49.2% | Northampton, NC / 20,611 |
88. | 48.9% | Craven, NC / 96,789 |
89. | 48.7% | Vance, NC / 42,987 |
90. | 48.3% | Halifax, NC / 55,118 |
91. | 48.0% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,112 |
92. | 47.8% | Graham, NC / 7,964 |
93. | 47.8% | Hoke, NC / 42,410 |
94. | 47.7% | Martin, NC / 23,699 |
95. | 47.7% | Washington, NC / 12,979 |
96. | 47.5% | Hertford, NC / 23,281 |
97. | 46.6% | Camden, NC / 9,375 |
98. | 46.6% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,334 |
99. | 46.5% | Onslow, NC / 165,181 |
100. | 46.1% | Cumberland, NC / 309,316 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Employed Male Civilian Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Employed Male Civilian Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.