A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Employed Female Civilian Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 53.9% | Cumberland, NC / 309,316 |
2. | 53.5% | Onslow, NC / 165,181 |
3. | 53.4% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,334 |
4. | 53.4% | Camden, NC / 9,375 |
5. | 52.5% | Hertford, NC / 23,281 |
6. | 52.3% | Washington, NC / 12,979 |
7. | 52.3% | Martin, NC / 23,699 |
8. | 52.2% | Hoke, NC / 42,410 |
9. | 52.2% | Graham, NC / 7,964 |
10. | 52.0% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,112 |
11. | 51.7% | Halifax, NC / 55,118 |
12. | 51.3% | Vance, NC / 42,987 |
13. | 51.1% | Craven, NC / 96,789 |
14. | 50.8% | Northampton, NC / 20,611 |
15. | 50.6% | Orange, NC / 124,503 |
16. | 50.6% | Hyde, NC / 5,256 |
17. | 50.6% | Durham, NC / 256,296 |
18. | 50.6% | Greene, NC / 20,402 |
18. | 50.6% | Swain, NC / 13,367 |
20. | 50.5% | Edgecombe, NC / 52,586 |
21. | 50.5% | Scotland, NC / 36,394 |
22. | 49.9% | Pitt, NC / 151,931 |
23. | 49.8% | Rutherford, NC / 63,153 |
24. | 49.8% | Bladen, NC / 32,412 |
25. | 49.6% | Wayne, NC / 113,290 |
26. | 49.5% | Lenoir, NC / 56,831 |
27. | 49.2% | Nash, NC / 92,814 |
28. | 49.2% | Columbus, NC / 54,050 |
29. | 49.1% | Clay, NC / 10,084 |
30. | 49.1% | New Hanover, NC / 189,463 |
31. | 49.0% | Anson, NC / 25,243 |
32. | 48.9% | Jackson, NC / 36,447 |
33. | 48.8% | Lee, NC / 57,919 |
34. | 48.7% | Currituck, NC / 23,713 |
35. | 48.6% | Buncombe, NC / 225,869 |
36. | 48.6% | Forsyth, NC / 346,851 |
37. | 48.4% | Bertie, NC / 19,187 |
38. | 48.2% | Guilford, NC / 464,041 |
39. | 48.2% | Cleveland, NC / 98,331 |
40. | 48.2% | Harnett, NC / 108,885 |
41. | 48.1% | Alamance, NC / 144,769 |
42. | 48.1% | Warren, NC / 19,545 |
43. | 48.1% | Pender, NC / 49,408 |
44. | 48.0% | Wilson, NC / 76,765 |
45. | 47.8% | Stokes, NC / 45,916 |
46. | 47.8% | Yadkin, NC / 37,520 |
46. | 47.8% | Caswell, NC / 23,228 |
48. | 47.8% | Cherokee, NC / 26,203 |
49. | 47.7% | Perquimans, NC / 12,367 |
50. | 47.6% | Burke, NC / 88,987 |
51. | 47.5% | Moore, NC / 84,280 |
52. | 47.4% | Mcdowell, NC / 43,587 |
53. | 47.3% | Robeson, NC / 127,686 |
54. | 47.2% | Rockingham, NC / 92,007 |
55. | 47.2% | Haywood, NC / 56,535 |
56. | 47.1% | Henderson, NC / 100,333 |
57. | 47.1% | Brunswick, NC / 98,712 |
58. | 47.0% | Gaston, NC / 202,149 |
59. | 47.0% | Mecklenburg, NC / 861,189 |
60. | 47.0% | Ashe, NC / 25,467 |
61. | 47.0% | Wilkes, NC / 66,563 |
62. | 46.9% | Macon, NC / 32,607 |
63. | 46.8% | Chowan, NC / 14,629 |
64. | 46.7% | Avery, NC / 17,903 |
65. | 46.7% | Chatham, NC / 61,444 |
66. | 46.6% | Surry, NC / 72,166 |
66. | 46.6% | Beaufort, NC / 45,993 |
68. | 46.6% | Davie, NC / 40,297 |
69. | 46.4% | Cabarrus, NC / 161,473 |
70. | 46.4% | Richmond, NC / 45,947 |
71. | 46.4% | Watauga, NC / 44,636 |
72. | 46.3% | Rowan, NC / 137,387 |
73. | 46.3% | Carteret, NC / 63,369 |
74. | 46.3% | Franklin, NC / 57,201 |
75. | 46.2% | Person, NC / 37,301 |
76. | 46.2% | Stanly, NC / 59,136 |
77. | 46.1% | Catawba, NC / 155,157 |
78. | 46.1% | Wake, NC / 828,759 |
79. | 46.0% | Madison, NC / 20,227 |
80. | 45.9% | Randolph, NC / 139,443 |
81. | 45.9% | Johnston, NC / 156,888 |
82. | 45.8% | Gates, NC / 11,555 |
83. | 45.8% | Dare, NC / 33,976 |
84. | 45.8% | Davidson, NC / 156,033 |
85. | 45.5% | Iredell, NC / 150,346 |
86. | 45.5% | Sampson, NC / 62,996 |
87. | 45.4% | Transylvania, NC / 29,886 |
88. | 45.4% | Lincoln, NC / 72,728 |
89. | 45.4% | Polk, NC / 19,107 |
90. | 45.2% | Alexander, NC / 36,278 |
91. | 45.1% | Pamlico, NC / 12,470 |
92. | 45.0% | Caldwell, NC / 79,382 |
93. | 44.9% | Jones, NC / 10,028 |
94. | 44.5% | Union, NC / 181,852 |
95. | 44.4% | Granville, NC / 55,670 |
96. | 44.3% | Yancey, NC / 18,336 |
97. | 44.0% | Duplin, NC / 52,358 |
98. | 43.6% | Mitchell, NC / 15,690 |
99. | 42.1% | Alleghany, NC / 10,905 |
100. | 40.8% | Montgomery, NC / 27,456 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Employed Female Civilian Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Employed Female Civilian Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.