A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting, Mining Workers Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 23.0% | Alleghany, NC / 10,905 |
2. | 13.7% | Hyde, NC / 5,256 |
3. | 12.6% | Duplin, NC / 52,358 |
4. | 11.2% | Sampson, NC / 62,996 |
5. | 9.1% | Washington, NC / 12,979 |
6. | 8.3% | Bladen, NC / 32,412 |
7. | 8.2% | Jones, NC / 10,028 |
8. | 7.5% | Mitchell, NC / 15,690 |
9. | 6.7% | Beaufort, NC / 45,993 |
10. | 6.3% | Bertie, NC / 19,187 |
11. | 5.6% | Warren, NC / 19,545 |
12. | 5.1% | Perquimans, NC / 12,367 |
13. | 5.1% | Chowan, NC / 14,629 |
14. | 4.8% | Martin, NC / 23,699 |
15. | 4.7% | Pamlico, NC / 12,470 |
16. | 4.6% | Greene, NC / 20,402 |
17. | 4.5% | Gates, NC / 11,555 |
18. | 4.3% | Avery, NC / 17,903 |
19. | 4.1% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,112 |
20. | 4.1% | Caswell, NC / 23,228 |
20. | 4.1% | Montgomery, NC / 27,456 |
22. | 4.0% | Anson, NC / 25,243 |
23. | 4.0% | Columbus, NC / 54,050 |
24. | 3.9% | Lenoir, NC / 56,831 |
25. | 3.7% | Robeson, NC / 127,686 |
26. | 3.6% | Northampton, NC / 20,611 |
27. | 3.5% | Wilkes, NC / 66,563 |
28. | 3.4% | Surry, NC / 72,166 |
29. | 3.4% | Hoke, NC / 42,410 |
30. | 3.4% | Wayne, NC / 113,290 |
30. | 3.4% | Edgecombe, NC / 52,586 |
32. | 3.4% | Ashe, NC / 25,467 |
33. | 3.3% | Scotland, NC / 36,394 |
34. | 3.3% | Yancey, NC / 18,336 |
35. | 3.1% | Halifax, NC / 55,118 |
36. | 3.0% | Yadkin, NC / 37,520 |
37. | 3.0% | Cherokee, NC / 26,203 |
38. | 3.0% | Camden, NC / 9,375 |
39. | 3.0% | Pender, NC / 49,408 |
40. | 2.8% | Franklin, NC / 57,201 |
41. | 2.6% | Hertford, NC / 23,281 |
42. | 2.6% | Moore, NC / 84,280 |
43. | 2.6% | Polk, NC / 19,107 |
44. | 2.5% | Transylvania, NC / 29,886 |
44. | 2.5% | Alexander, NC / 36,278 |
46. | 2.5% | Nash, NC / 92,814 |
47. | 2.5% | Madison, NC / 20,227 |
47. | 2.5% | Person, NC / 37,301 |
49. | 2.4% | Harnett, NC / 108,885 |
50. | 2.4% | Dare, NC / 33,976 |
51. | 2.4% | Granville, NC / 55,670 |
52. | 2.4% | Currituck, NC / 23,713 |
53. | 2.3% | Richmond, NC / 45,947 |
54. | 2.2% | Davie, NC / 40,297 |
55. | 2.0% | Wilson, NC / 76,765 |
56. | 2.0% | Graham, NC / 7,964 |
57. | 2.0% | Chatham, NC / 61,444 |
58. | 2.0% | Mcdowell, NC / 43,587 |
59. | 1.9% | Johnston, NC / 156,888 |
60. | 1.9% | Vance, NC / 42,987 |
61. | 1.8% | Craven, NC / 96,789 |
62. | 1.8% | Randolph, NC / 139,443 |
63. | 1.8% | Lee, NC / 57,919 |
64. | 1.6% | Lincoln, NC / 72,728 |
65. | 1.5% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,334 |
66. | 1.5% | Brunswick, NC / 98,712 |
67. | 1.4% | Pitt, NC / 151,931 |
67. | 1.4% | Carteret, NC / 63,369 |
69. | 1.4% | Rockingham, NC / 92,007 |
70. | 1.3% | Onslow, NC / 165,181 |
71. | 1.3% | Henderson, NC / 100,333 |
72. | 1.2% | Stanly, NC / 59,136 |
73. | 1.2% | Jackson, NC / 36,447 |
74. | 1.2% | Macon, NC / 32,607 |
75. | 1.1% | Stokes, NC / 45,916 |
76. | 1.1% | Orange, NC / 124,503 |
77. | 1.1% | Cleveland, NC / 98,331 |
78. | 1.1% | Swain, NC / 13,367 |
79. | 1.0% | Union, NC / 181,852 |
80. | 1.0% | Caldwell, NC / 79,382 |
80. | 1.0% | Iredell, NC / 150,346 |
82. | 0.9% | Cumberland, NC / 309,316 |
83. | 0.9% | Haywood, NC / 56,535 |
84. | 0.9% | Buncombe, NC / 225,869 |
85. | 0.9% | Alamance, NC / 144,769 |
86. | 0.8% | Watauga, NC / 44,636 |
87. | 0.8% | Davidson, NC / 156,033 |
88. | 0.8% | Clay, NC / 10,084 |
89. | 0.7% | Rutherford, NC / 63,153 |
90. | 0.6% | Cabarrus, NC / 161,473 |
91. | 0.6% | Rowan, NC / 137,387 |
92. | 0.6% | Burke, NC / 88,987 |
93. | 0.5% | Catawba, NC / 155,157 |
94. | 0.4% | Guilford, NC / 464,041 |
95. | 0.4% | Gaston, NC / 202,149 |
95. | 0.4% | Forsyth, NC / 346,851 |
97. | 0.4% | Wake, NC / 828,759 |
98. | 0.2% | Durham, NC / 256,296 |
99. | 0.2% | New Hanover, NC / 189,463 |
100. | 0.2% | Mecklenburg, NC / 861,189 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting, Mining Workers Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting, Mining Workers Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.