A total of 100 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Age 16 or Older Population Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 87.3% | Watauga, NC / 44,636 |
2. | 86.2% | Tyrrell, NC / 4,112 |
3. | 84.8% | Pamlico, NC / 12,470 |
4. | 84.6% | Jackson, NC / 36,447 |
5. | 84.5% | Hyde, NC / 5,256 |
6. | 83.9% | Avery, NC / 17,903 |
7. | 83.8% | Clay, NC / 10,084 |
8. | 83.4% | Polk, NC / 19,107 |
9. | 83.3% | Ashe, NC / 25,467 |
10. | 83.3% | Macon, NC / 32,607 |
11. | 83.2% | Transylvania, NC / 29,886 |
12. | 83.0% | Carteret, NC / 63,369 |
13. | 83.0% | Brunswick, NC / 98,712 |
14. | 82.8% | Mitchell, NC / 15,690 |
15. | 82.6% | Perquimans, NC / 12,367 |
16. | 82.4% | Yancey, NC / 18,336 |
17. | 82.4% | Cherokee, NC / 26,203 |
18. | 82.0% | Haywood, NC / 56,535 |
19. | 82.0% | Madison, NC / 20,227 |
20. | 81.9% | Alleghany, NC / 10,905 |
21. | 81.7% | New Hanover, NC / 189,463 |
22. | 81.6% | Dare, NC / 33,976 |
22. | 81.6% | Orange, NC / 124,503 |
24. | 81.6% | Henderson, NC / 100,333 |
25. | 81.5% | Buncombe, NC / 225,869 |
26. | 81.3% | Northampton, NC / 20,611 |
27. | 81.2% | Warren, NC / 19,545 |
28. | 80.9% | Graham, NC / 7,964 |
29. | 80.8% | Caswell, NC / 23,228 |
30. | 80.7% | Jones, NC / 10,028 |
31. | 80.5% | Moore, NC / 84,280 |
32. | 80.4% | Hertford, NC / 23,281 |
33. | 80.3% | Burke, NC / 88,987 |
34. | 80.3% | Pender, NC / 49,408 |
35. | 80.0% | Wilkes, NC / 66,563 |
36. | 80.0% | Anson, NC / 25,243 |
37. | 80.0% | Beaufort, NC / 45,993 |
38. | 79.9% | Mcdowell, NC / 43,587 |
39. | 79.9% | Greene, NC / 20,402 |
40. | 79.9% | Chatham, NC / 61,444 |
41. | 79.8% | Rutherford, NC / 63,153 |
42. | 79.7% | Stanly, NC / 59,136 |
43. | 79.7% | Stokes, NC / 45,916 |
43. | 79.7% | Caldwell, NC / 79,382 |
45. | 79.7% | Martin, NC / 23,699 |
46. | 79.6% | Alexander, NC / 36,278 |
47. | 79.6% | Rockingham, NC / 92,007 |
48. | 79.6% | Granville, NC / 55,670 |
49. | 79.4% | Bertie, NC / 19,187 |
49. | 79.4% | Swain, NC / 13,367 |
51. | 79.3% | Craven, NC / 96,789 |
51. | 79.3% | Chowan, NC / 14,629 |
53. | 79.2% | Yadkin, NC / 37,520 |
54. | 79.2% | Person, NC / 37,301 |
55. | 79.1% | Pitt, NC / 151,931 |
56. | 79.0% | Rowan, NC / 137,387 |
57. | 78.9% | Durham, NC / 256,296 |
57. | 78.9% | Surry, NC / 72,166 |
59. | 78.8% | Guilford, NC / 464,041 |
60. | 78.8% | Halifax, NC / 55,118 |
61. | 78.7% | Currituck, NC / 23,713 |
62. | 78.7% | Davidson, NC / 156,033 |
63. | 78.7% | Davie, NC / 40,297 |
64. | 78.7% | Pasquotank, NC / 40,334 |
65. | 78.6% | Washington, NC / 12,979 |
66. | 78.6% | Bladen, NC / 32,412 |
67. | 78.5% | Cleveland, NC / 98,331 |
68. | 78.5% | Franklin, NC / 57,201 |
69. | 78.5% | Alamance, NC / 144,769 |
70. | 78.4% | Gaston, NC / 202,149 |
71. | 78.4% | Catawba, NC / 155,157 |
72. | 78.1% | Forsyth, NC / 346,851 |
73. | 78.1% | Nash, NC / 92,814 |
74. | 78.1% | Lenoir, NC / 56,831 |
75. | 78.0% | Lincoln, NC / 72,728 |
76. | 78.0% | Onslow, NC / 165,181 |
77. | 77.9% | Columbus, NC / 54,050 |
78. | 77.8% | Montgomery, NC / 27,456 |
79. | 77.7% | Randolph, NC / 139,443 |
80. | 77.7% | Richmond, NC / 45,947 |
81. | 77.7% | Wilson, NC / 76,765 |
82. | 77.6% | Gates, NC / 11,555 |
83. | 77.1% | Wayne, NC / 113,290 |
84. | 77.0% | Iredell, NC / 150,346 |
85. | 77.0% | Lee, NC / 57,919 |
86. | 76.9% | Camden, NC / 9,375 |
87. | 76.8% | Duplin, NC / 52,358 |
88. | 76.8% | Vance, NC / 42,987 |
89. | 76.7% | Scotland, NC / 36,394 |
90. | 76.7% | Sampson, NC / 62,996 |
91. | 76.5% | Mecklenburg, NC / 861,189 |
92. | 76.4% | Wake, NC / 828,759 |
93. | 76.4% | Edgecombe, NC / 52,586 |
94. | 76.2% | Harnett, NC / 108,885 |
95. | 75.6% | Cumberland, NC / 309,316 |
96. | 75.5% | Cabarrus, NC / 161,473 |
97. | 75.4% | Johnston, NC / 156,888 |
98. | 75.2% | Robeson, NC / 127,686 |
99. | 73.4% | Union, NC / 181,852 |
100. | 73.3% | Hoke, NC / 42,410 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Age 16 or Older Population Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Age 16 or Older Population Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.