A total of 102 results found. Show Results on Map.
Rank | Occupied Housing Units Percentage ▼ | County / Population |
1. | 94.8% | Woodford, IL / 38,226 |
2. | 94.6% | Kane, IL / 502,628 |
3. | 94.4% | Kendall, IL / 105,602 |
4. | 94.3% | Monroe, IL / 32,431 |
5. | 94.3% | Dupage, IL / 911,481 |
6. | 94.2% | Tazewell, IL / 133,863 |
7. | 94.2% | Mchenry, IL / 306,050 |
8. | 94.1% | Will, IL / 667,977 |
9. | 93.9% | Dekalb, IL / 104,026 |
10. | 93.2% | Mercer, IL / 16,551 |
11. | 93.0% | Bureau, IL / 35,083 |
12. | 92.7% | Lake, IL / 697,179 |
13. | 92.7% | Effingham, IL / 34,232 |
14. | 92.6% | Washington, IL / 14,841 |
15. | 92.5% | Henry, IL / 50,477 |
16. | 92.5% | Clinton, IL / 37,395 |
17. | 92.4% | Livingston, IL / 39,010 |
18. | 92.3% | Ogle, IL / 53,578 |
19. | 92.1% | Grundy, IL / 48,744 |
20. | 92.1% | Rock Island, IL / 147,524 |
21. | 91.8% | Mclean, IL / 166,706 |
22. | 91.7% | Lee, IL / 36,100 |
22. | 91.7% | Whiteside, IL / 58,750 |
24. | 91.7% | Jasper, IL / 9,752 |
25. | 91.6% | Madison, IL / 268,005 |
26. | 91.5% | Sangamon, IL / 195,288 |
26. | 91.5% | Boone, IL / 53,567 |
28. | 91.3% | Kankakee, IL / 112,100 |
29. | 91.3% | Mason, IL / 14,921 |
30. | 91.1% | La Salle, IL / 113,789 |
31. | 91.0% | Christian, IL / 34,936 |
32. | 90.9% | Logan, IL / 30,440 |
33. | 90.9% | Moultrie, IL / 14,723 |
34. | 90.8% | Adams, IL / 67,030 |
35. | 90.8% | Douglas, IL / 20,012 |
36. | 90.8% | Peoria, IL / 185,108 |
37. | 90.8% | Knox, IL / 52,932 |
38. | 90.7% | Dewitt, IL / 16,672 |
39. | 90.6% | Champaign, IL / 197,867 |
40. | 90.3% | Fulton, IL / 37,205 |
41. | 90.3% | Piatt, IL / 16,708 |
42. | 90.2% | Lawrence, IL / 16,849 |
43. | 90.1% | Mcdonough, IL / 32,730 |
44. | 90.1% | Greene, IL / 13,983 |
45. | 90.0% | Morgan, IL / 35,755 |
46. | 89.9% | Ford, IL / 14,113 |
47. | 89.9% | Montgomery, IL / 30,230 |
48. | 89.8% | Wayne, IL / 16,846 |
49. | 89.8% | Jefferson, IL / 39,202 |
50. | 89.8% | Winnebago, IL / 293,972 |
51. | 89.6% | Saint Clair, IL / 266,727 |
52. | 89.6% | Menard, IL / 12,702 |
53. | 89.5% | Crawford, IL / 19,864 |
54. | 89.4% | Coles, IL / 53,568 |
55. | 89.4% | Edgar, IL / 18,776 |
56. | 89.3% | Macoupin, IL / 47,980 |
57. | 89.1% | Cook, IL / 5,172,848 |
58. | 89.1% | Stark, IL / 6,086 |
59. | 89.0% | Warren, IL / 17,745 |
60. | 88.9% | White, IL / 14,800 |
61. | 88.9% | Union, IL / 17,959 |
62. | 88.9% | Saline, IL / 25,171 |
63. | 88.9% | Stephenson, IL / 47,791 |
64. | 88.8% | Macon, IL / 110,719 |
65. | 88.4% | Vermilion, IL / 82,033 |
65. | 88.4% | Massac, IL / 15,425 |
67. | 88.3% | Jersey, IL / 22,932 |
68. | 88.3% | Bond, IL / 17,904 |
69. | 88.2% | Richland, IL / 16,166 |
70. | 88.0% | Marion, IL / 39,722 |
71. | 87.9% | Iroquois, IL / 30,068 |
72. | 87.8% | Fayette, IL / 22,007 |
73. | 87.7% | Shelby, IL / 22,362 |
74. | 87.7% | Randolph, IL / 33,567 |
75. | 87.5% | Williamson, IL / 65,579 |
76. | 87.5% | Franklin, IL / 39,528 |
77. | 87.2% | Clay, IL / 13,927 |
78. | 86.9% | Perry, IL / 22,488 |
79. | 86.8% | Schuyler, IL / 7,527 |
80. | 86.8% | Marshall, IL / 12,763 |
81. | 86.8% | Edwards, IL / 6,707 |
82. | 86.7% | Wabash, IL / 12,141 |
83. | 86.5% | Clark, IL / 16,545 |
84. | 86.4% | Brown, IL / 6,897 |
85. | 86.4% | Scott, IL / 5,374 |
86. | 86.3% | Hancock, IL / 19,227 |
87. | 86.1% | Cass, IL / 13,648 |
88. | 85.4% | Hamilton, IL / 8,453 |
89. | 84.8% | Cumberland, IL / 11,073 |
90. | 84.4% | Gallatin, IL / 5,773 |
91. | 84.1% | Jackson, IL / 59,864 |
92. | 83.6% | Carroll, IL / 15,615 |
93. | 83.2% | Henderson, IL / 7,462 |
94. | 82.9% | Pike, IL / 16,580 |
95. | 82.6% | Putnam, IL / 5,982 |
96. | 80.4% | Johnson, IL / 12,710 |
97. | 80.4% | Alexander, IL / 8,449 |
98. | 78.8% | Pulaski, IL / 6,262 |
99. | 75.5% | Hardin, IL / 4,402 |
100. | 74.5% | Jo Daviess, IL / 22,728 |
101. | 73.7% | Pope, IL / 4,426 |
102. | 72.4% | Calhoun, IL / 5,118 |
Please note that we only rank locations with 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data. The rank above might not be a complete list. Locations without 'Occupied Housing Units Percentage' data are not listed.
*ACS stands for U.S. Census American Community Survey. According to the U.S. Census, if the date is a range, you can interpret the data as an average of the period of time.