Westerville-North High School
950 County Line Rd
Westerville OH, 43081, Franklin County
Phone: 614-797-6200
Ranking: (257 out of 821, top 31%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Westerville City School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 73 | 75 | 79 | 78 | 75 | 81 | 84 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,381 | 1,434 | 1,476 | 1,475 | 1,542 | 1,533 | 1,524 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 407 | 29.5% | 374 | 26.1% | 443 | 30.0% | 374 | 25.4% | 420 | 27.2% | 425 | 27.7% | 448 | 29.4% |
Grade 10: | 329 | 23.8% | 402 | 28.0% | 306 | 20.7% | 371 | 25.2% | 400 | 25.9% | 378 | 24.7% | 323 | 21.2% |
Grade 11: | 362 | 26.2% | 299 | 20.9% | 370 | 25.1% | 370 | 25.1% | 366 | 23.7% | 359 | 23.4% | 383 | 25.1% |
Grade 12: | 283 | 20.5% | 359 | 25.0% | 357 | 24.2% | 360 | 24.4% | 356 | 23.1% | 371 | 24.2% | 370 | 24.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 744 | 53.9% | 770 | 53.7% | 800 | 54.2% | 787 | 53.4% | 765 | 49.6% | 769 | 50.2% | 769 | 50.5% |
Female: | 637 | 46.1% | 664 | 46.3% | 676 | 45.8% | 688 | 46.6% | 685 | 44.4% | 678 | 44.2% | 689 | 45.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 6 | 0.4% | 3 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% | 1 | 0.1% |
Asian: | 25 | 1.8% | 23 | 1.6% | 24 | 1.6% | 26 | 1.8% | 29 | 1.9% | 29 | 1.9% | 30 | 2.0% |
Hispanic: | 55 | 4.0% | 60 | 4.2% | 69 | 4.7% | 58 | 3.9% | 39 | 2.5% | 37 | 2.4% | 30 | 2.0% |
Black: | 310 | 22.4% | 309 | 21.5% | 300 | 20.3% | 307 | 20.8% | 292 | 18.9% | 287 | 18.7% | 307 | 20.1% |
White: | 892 | 64.6% | 953 | 66.5% | 993 | 67.3% | 994 | 67.4% | 1,096 | 71.1% | 1,101 | 71.8% | 1,094 | 71.8% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 91 | 6.6% | 83 | 5.8% | 82 | 5.6% | 83 | 5.6% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 299 | 21.7% | 279 | 19.5% | 278 | 18.8% | 260 | 17.6% | 230 | 14.9% | 197 | 12.9% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 31 | 2.2% | 35 | 2.4% | 46 | 3.1% | 31 | 2.1% | 39 | 2.5% | 29 | 1.9% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 19.00 | 19.19 | 18.68 | 18.98 | 20.48 | 19.00 | 18.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.1% | 68.7% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 91.3% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 88% | 90.6% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 86.5% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 88.8% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 90.4% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 90.5% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 91.7% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 91.0% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.0% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 76.6% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.5% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 94.6% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 90.8% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 91.7% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 91% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 92.3% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 92.8% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 92.7% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.7% | 92.9% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 84.3% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.6% | 83.8% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.8% | 79% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 85.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 84.9% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 83.3% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.8% | 85.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.0% | 86.9% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 84.2% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.9% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 89.6% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 83.8% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 90.5% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.2% | 90.3% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.1% | 92.6% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 91% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.6% | 91.3% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 90.1% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 86.3% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.2% | 92.7% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.7% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 93.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.3% | 94.7% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.8% | 92.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 94.3% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 92.8% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 90.7% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.8% | 93.5% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.2% | 90.4% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 93.4% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 94.5% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 92.9% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.1% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 95.4% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.1% | 95.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 93.6% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.7% | 95.7% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 94.7% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97% | 96.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.3% | 96.7% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 97.0% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.7% | 90.4% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 88.8% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 89.4% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 90.7% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 91.4% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 93.2% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.9% | 93.3% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 92% | 93.8% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 91.5% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 93.8% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.3% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 94.5% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 95.3% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.0% | 95.1% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96% | 96.5% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 95.2% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.5% | 95.6% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 95.7% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 98.2% | 96.3% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.4% | 97.2% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.0% | 96.4% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Westerville-North High School was rated 4.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.