Roberta G. Doering School
68 Main St
Agawam MA, 01001, Hampden County
Phone: 413-789-1400
Ranking: (694 out of 1,316, bottom 47%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 5 to Grade 8
School District: Agawam School District
Title I Eligible School: No
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 47 | 42 | 47 | 46 | 47 | 50 | 44 | |||||||
Total Students: | 609 | 602 | 636 | 649 | 696 | 683 | 703 | |||||||
Grade 5: | 315 | 51.7% | 281 | 46.7% | 311 | 48.9% | 293 | 45.1% | 344 | 49.4% | 337 | 49.3% | 343 | 48.8% |
Grade 6: | 288 | 47.3% | 312 | 51.8% | 314 | 49.4% | 349 | 53.8% | 352 | 50.6% | 346 | 50.7% | 360 | 51.2% |
Grade 7: | 4 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.5% | 7 | 1.1% | 5 | 0.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Grade 8: | 2 | 0.3% | 5 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.3% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 292 | 47.9% | 306 | 50.8% | 325 | 51.1% | 332 | 51.2% | 359 | 51.6% | 362 | 53.0% | 366 | 52.1% |
Female: | 317 | 52.1% | 296 | 49.2% | 311 | 48.9% | 317 | 48.8% | 337 | 48.4% | 321 | 47.0% | 326 | 46.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.4% |
Asian: | 10 | 1.6% | 8 | 1.3% | 9 | 1.4% | 13 | 2.0% | 11 | 1.6% | 8 | 1.2% | 5 | 0.7% |
Hispanic: | 27 | 4.4% | 23 | 3.8% | 34 | 5.3% | 26 | 4.0% | 30 | 4.3% | 24 | 3.5% | 16 | 2.3% |
Black: | 5 | 0.8% | 6 | 1.0% | 8 | 1.3% | 6 | 0.9% | 7 | 1.0% | 12 | 1.8% | 11 | 1.6% |
White: | 553 | 90.8% | 560 | 93.0% | 573 | 90.1% | 597 | 92.0% | 641 | 92.1% | 626 | 91.7% | 661 | 94.0% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 4 | 0.6% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 14 | 2.3% | 5 | 0.8% | 11 | 1.7% | 6 | 0.9% | 4 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.7% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 165 | 27.1% | 151 | 25.1% | 186 | 29.2% | 155 | 23.9% | 148 | 21.3% | 80 | 11.7% | 118 | 16.8% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 36 | 5.9% | 33 | 5.5% | 20 | 3.1% | 30 | 4.6% | 32 | 4.6% | 31 | 4.5% | 37 | 5.3% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.96 | 14.17 | 13.56 | 13.99 | 14.94 | 13.80 | 16.10 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2006 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 60% | 59% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 51% | 63% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 58% | 61% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 62% | 61% | 63% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 63% | 62% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 69% | 67% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 62% | 61% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 65% | 65% |
2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 41% | 40% | 43% |
2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 50% | 51% |
2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 54% | 52% |
2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 59% | 59% | 54% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 57% | 55% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 60% | 59% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 60% | 57% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 66% | 61% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 61.83% | 61% | 52% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 63% | 63% | 55% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 59% | 51% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 47% | 50% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 51% | 51% | 51% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 57% | 50% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 50% | 49% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 60% | 53% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 53% | 54% | 50% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 56% | 54% | 52% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 45% | 45% | 51% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 63% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 72% | 72% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 70% | 70% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 68% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 67% | 66% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 66% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 69% | 69% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 68% | 65% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 40.0% | 39.0% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 52% | 52% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 52% | 51% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 56% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 60% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 59% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 60% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 63% | 63% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 60% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 63% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 62% | 60% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Roberta G. Doering School was rated 3 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.