R E Thompson Intermediate School
829 Frankfort Rd
Tuscumbia AL, 35674, Colbert County
Phone: 256-389-2930
Ranking: 
(484 out of 1,064, top 45%)*
(484 out of 1,064, top 45%)*Type: Regular Primary School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 3 to Grade 5
School District: Tuscumbia City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
| 2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
| Total Teachers: | 20 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 21 | 18 | |||||||
| Total Students: | 338 | 345 | 350 | 373 | 367 | 381 | 376 | |||||||
| Grade 3: | 110 | 32.5% | 110 | 31.9% | 119 | 34.0% | 124 | 33.2% | 114 | 31.1% | 127 | 33.3% | 121 | 32.2% |
| Grade 4: | 110 | 32.5% | 118 | 34.2% | 114 | 32.6% | 113 | 30.3% | 134 | 36.5% | 119 | 31.2% | 134 | 35.6% |
| Grade 5: | 118 | 34.9% | 115 | 33.3% | 117 | 33.4% | 136 | 36.5% | 119 | 32.4% | 135 | 35.4% | 121 | 32.2% |
| Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
| Male: | 192 | 56.8% | 190 | 55.1% | 197 | 56.3% | 201 | 53.9% | 188 | 51.2% | 191 | 50.1% | 188 | 50.0% |
| Female: | 146 | 43.2% | 155 | 44.9% | 153 | 43.7% | 172 | 46.1% | 171 | 46.6% | 182 | 47.8% | 184 | 48.9% |
| Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
| American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Asian: | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.3% | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hispanic: | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 1.9% | 4 | 1.1% | 5 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.3% |
| Black: | 81 | 24.0% | 74 | 21.4% | 82 | 23.4% | 98 | 26.3% | 108 | 29.4% | 101 | 26.5% | 84 | 22.3% |
| White: | 250 | 74.0% | 262 | 75.9% | 261 | 74.6% | 267 | 71.6% | 255 | 69.5% | 275 | 72.2% | 291 | 77.4% |
| Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Two or More Races: | 3 | 0.9% | 6 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
| Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 165 | 48.8% | 177 | 51.3% | 173 | 49.4% | 196 | 52.5% | 180 | 49.0% | 181 | 47.5% | 146 | 38.8% |
| Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 26 | 7.7% | 26 | 7.5% | 22 | 6.3% | 27 | 7.2% | 29 | 7.9% | 29 | 7.6% | 24 | 6.4% |
| Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.33 | 19.17 | 17.50 | 19.63 | 19.32 | 18.10 | 20.50 | |||||||
Test Performance
| Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
| ADAW | ||||||
| 2004 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 48% | 48% | 50.6% |
| 2005 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 43.7% | 43.7% | 42.2% |
| 2006 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 28.3% | 28.3% | 45% |
| 2008 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 39.09% | 39.09% | 37.08% |
| 2009 | Grammar and Usage | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.83% | 35.83% | 37.25% |
| 2004 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 64.4% | 64.4% | 57.3% |
| 2005 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 60.4% | 58.7% |
| 2006 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 64% |
| 2008 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.27% | 67.27% | 62.46% |
| 2009 | Holistic Composition | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.38% | 74.38% | 64.88% |
| 2004 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 53.8% | 48.9% |
| 2005 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 52% | 52% | 44.4% |
| 2006 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 47.7% | 47.7% | 48.1% |
| 2008 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 46.36% | 46.36% | 43.41% |
| 2009 | Sentence Formation | 5th Grade | % met std | 46.66% | 46.66% | 43.74% |
| 2004 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 54.8% | 47% |
| 2005 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 51% | 51% | 42.6% |
| 2006 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.5% | 41.5% | 48.1% |
| 2008 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.82% | 41.82% | 39.83% |
| 2009 | Writing Mechanics | 5th Grade | % met std | 46.66% | 46.66% | 40.59% |
| ARMT | ||||||
| 2005 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 79.3% | 79.3% | 74.1% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 77.7% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.53% | 88.53% | 77.41% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.17% | 92.17% | 77.69% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 81.39% | 81.39% | 79.37% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.38% | 89.38% | 80.13% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.48% | 83.48% | 83.7% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.25% | 92.25% | 85.23% |
| 2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.7% | 82.7% | 81% |
| 2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95.9% | 95.9% | 83.6% |
| 2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.68% | 92.68% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 89.56% | 89.56% | 85.35% |
| 2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.72% | 83.72% | 85.83% |
| 2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90.35% | 90.35% | 86.59% |
| 2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.68% | 92.68% | 86.82% |
| 2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.33% | 88.33% | 88.18% |
| 2004 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 73.4% | 71.9% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 85.9% | 74% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 75.8% | 77.9% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.51% | 80.51% | 78.31% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.17% | 64.17% | 78.93% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.46% | 64.46% | 79.12% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.12% | 69.12% | 81.26% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.91% | 69.91% | 82.42% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.82% | 79.82% | 85.24% |
| 2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 78.7% | 76.9% |
| 2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.9% | 86.9% | 83.3% |
| 2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.5% | 88.5% | 84.4% |
| 2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.37% | 92.37% | 85.01% |
| 2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 86.56% | 86.56% | 86.09% |
| 2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 88.53% | 88.53% | 86.5% |
| 2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 87.59% | 87.59% | 86.69% |
| 2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 91.3% | 87.93% |
| 2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 92.24% | 92.24% | 88.16% |
| 2005 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.3% | 66.3% | 71.8% |
| 2006 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 77.9% | 77.9% | 76.5% |
| 2007 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.96% | 70.96% | 77.26% |
| 2008 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.63% | 75.63% | 77.97% |
| 2009 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | 79.94% |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.13% | 78.13% | 82.61% |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.75% | 81.75% | 88.95% |
| 2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.7% | 93.7% | 91.32% |
| 2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 80.9% |
| 2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.2% | 80.7% |
| 2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 84.05% | 84.05% | 84.6% |
| 2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.76% | 90.76% | 84.37% |
| 2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.13% | 86.13% | 84.65% |
| 2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.06% | 89.06% | 85.64% |
| 2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 86.13% | 86.13% | 88.59% |
| 2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.96% | 91.96% | 88.88% |
| ASA | ||||||
| 2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.52% | 81.52% | 69.84% |
| 2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 81.03% | 81.03% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 84% | 84% | 77.35% |
| 2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 74.63% | 74.63% | 78.77% |
| 2012 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 90.18% | 90.18% | 80.09% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* R E Thompson Intermediate School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.