Maple Heights High School
1 Mustang Way
Maple Heights OH, 44137, Cuyahoga County
Phone: 216-438-6400
Ranking: (723 out of 821, bottom 12%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Maple Heights City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 66 | 69 | 72 | 79 | 80 | 79 | 90 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,099 | 1,079 | 1,167 | 1,221 | 1,218 | 1,274 | 1,291 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 314 | 28.6% | 313 | 29.0% | 317 | 27.2% | 333 | 27.3% | 306 | 25.1% | 364 | 28.6% | 418 | 32.4% |
Grade 10: | 297 | 27.0% | 263 | 24.4% | 249 | 21.3% | 285 | 23.3% | 304 | 25.0% | 306 | 24.0% | 289 | 22.4% |
Grade 11: | 237 | 21.6% | 218 | 20.2% | 272 | 23.3% | 306 | 25.1% | 313 | 25.7% | 284 | 22.3% | 316 | 24.5% |
Grade 12: | 251 | 22.8% | 284 | 26.3% | 326 | 27.9% | 297 | 24.3% | 295 | 24.2% | 320 | 25.1% | 268 | 20.8% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 577 | 52.5% | 571 | 52.9% | 632 | 54.2% | 627 | 51.4% | 590 | 48.4% | 628 | 49.3% | 627 | 48.6% |
Female: | 522 | 47.5% | 508 | 47.1% | 535 | 45.8% | 594 | 48.6% | 607 | 49.8% | 627 | 49.2% | 639 | 49.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.5% | 6 | 0.6% | 6 | 0.5% | 9 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.5% | 4 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.3% |
Hispanic: | 13 | 1.2% | 11 | 1.0% | 9 | 0.8% | 12 | 1.0% | 8 | 0.7% | 10 | 0.8% | 7 | 0.5% |
Black: | 1,029 | 93.6% | 1,011 | 93.7% | 1,093 | 93.7% | 1,141 | 93.4% | 1,154 | 94.7% | 1,202 | 94.3% | 1,192 | 92.3% |
White: | 33 | 3.0% | 32 | 3.0% | 36 | 3.1% | 42 | 3.4% | 37 | 3.0% | 47 | 3.7% | 67 | 5.2% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 19 | 1.7% | 19 | 1.8% | 22 | 1.9% | 17 | 1.4% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 786 | 71.5% | 730 | 67.7% | 390 | 33.4% | 716 | 58.6% | 617 | 50.7% | 673 | 52.8% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 0 | 0.0% | 53 | 4.9% | 56 | 4.8% | 92 | 7.5% | 73 | 6.0% | 95 | 7.5% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.78 | 15.75 | 16.21 | 15.46 | 15.23 | 16.10 | 14.30 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 28.9% | 28.9% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 53.9% | 53.9% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 73% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 65% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.3% | 55.3% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 62.2% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.2% | 66.4% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 65.6% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 68.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 67.9% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 59.2% | 59.2% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.1% | 84.1% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 83.9% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 79.2% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.1% | 74.1% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 69% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 69.1% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 64.0% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.5% | 73.6% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 35.7% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 49.6% | 49.6% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.1% | 55.1% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.1% | 51.1% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 48.9% | 48.9% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 46.8% | 47.1% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 50% | 50% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 44.7% | 44.5% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 51.1% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.4% | 66.4% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 68.9% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 70.5% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 68.3% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.5% | 66.5% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.4% | 65.5% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 61.9% | 61.8% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 54.6% | 54.4% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 55.9% | 56.1% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.4% | 75.4% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.5% | 82.5% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.4% | 85.4% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.4% | 77.4% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 76.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80.8% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 70.4% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 70.7% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 76.9% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 80.1% | 80.1% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 71.8% | 71.8% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 73.9% | 74% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.8% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 75.3% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.7% | 88.7% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 90.3% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 84% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.6% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 86.0% | 86.1% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.6% | 68.6% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.2% | 62.2% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 62.4% | 62.4% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.5% | 60.7% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.8% | 68.5% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 60.1% | 59.8% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.4% | 79.4% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.8% | 82.8% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 84.7% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 72.8% | 72.9% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 76.1% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 75.3% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.4% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.4% | 95.4% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.1% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.1% | 88.2% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 87.8% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.5% | 84.5% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Maple Heights High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.